Processing Time Question

Message boards : Number crunching : Processing Time Question

To post messages, you must log in.

Profile JAKware

Send message
Joined: 28 Nov 99
Posts: 8
Credit: 5,259,236
RAC: 2,616
United States
Message 28002 - Posted: 19 Sep 2004, 11:48:39 UTC

I am running Seti@Boinc on an older laptop Compaq Intel Mobile 233 64meg (I know small machine). The issue is this; When it starts working on a WU it goes along very fast, then it starts moving slower. Yesterday I downloaded a new WU and it took about 1.5 hours to get to 51%. In the 17 hours since then it has only progressed 20%. By the time I get done with a work unit it has taken abouit 60 hours. I have even tried re-booting to see if this helps, nothing. Keep in mind that this happens on EVERY work unit.

Any ideas why crunching is so fast then gets progessively slower?

Thank you.
ID: 28002 · Report as offensive
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 16 Apr 02
Posts: 8026
Credit: 600,015
RAC: 0
Message 28005 - Posted: 19 Sep 2004, 11:52:18 UTC

I don't know why this happens. My AMD athlonXP took a WU to 60% in 3 minutes then slowed down to taking the full, normal 6 hours.
ID: 28005 · Report as offensive
Profile MikeProject Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 01
Posts: 29949
Credit: 51,326,993
RAC: 20,838
Message 28010 - Posted: 19 Sep 2004, 12:07:37 UTC


This is a calculation error in seti client.
It will be fixed later, because its an cosmetic issue.

greetz Mike

ID: 28010 · Report as offensive
Profile Paul D. Buck
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Jul 00
Posts: 3898
Credit: 1,158,042
RAC: 0
United States
Message 28095 - Posted: 19 Sep 2004, 19:11:15 UTC

My understanding of the rumor control word is that part of what was done with 4.09 was intended to address this issue. Note, I did not ssay it fixed it, but it should be a little better with 4.09 (note: rumor control can get it wrong).

Just think of it as a gas gague in a car. None of them are linear. After you buy a car you have to drive it for awhile before you know if 1/4 tank is 1/4 of a tank or really 1/2 or 1/2204 left. You know the kind, when it hist 1/4 take you had better be pulling into the station for gas...
For BOINC Documentaion: Click Me!

ID: 28095 · Report as offensive
Profile Keck_Komputers
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 1575
Credit: 2,680,567
RAC: 2,078
United States
Message 28482 - Posted: 20 Sep 2004, 22:13:19 UTC
Last modified: 20 Sep 2004, 22:13:56 UTC

Each loop through the seti app takes longer than the previous one. The frequency sensitivity increases each time. This is not really a bug just the way the program works.

John Keck -- BOINCing since 2002/12/08 --
ID: 28482 · Report as offensive
Profile FalconFly

Send message
Joined: 5 Oct 99
Posts: 394
Credit: 18,053,892
RAC: 0
Message 28483 - Posted: 20 Sep 2004, 22:18:23 UTC - in response to Message 28482.  
Last modified: 20 Sep 2004, 22:19:11 UTC

The old SETI Client also had (depending on Angle Range) a similar behaviour.

e.g. on VLAR Workunits, I saw it zooming through the first ~8% at light speed, afterwards constant progress far below that.

On normal AR Workunits, first ~7.5% above average speed, ~7.5% to ~78% normal speed, and then accelerating again beyond ~78%.
(all observed on Win32 Clients)

Looking at the Graphics during the first ~60% should show exactly what it does, I reckon it's doing all the (very fast) Pulse/Triplet search, after that it switches to the (intensive and relatively slow) FFT calculations including the best Gaussian shaping.
<p>Scientific Network : 36200 MHz «» 8204 MB «» 815.0 GB </p>
ID: 28483 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : Processing Time Question

©2017 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.