Windy Day (Jan 08 2008)

Message boards : Technical News : Windy Day (Jan 08 2008)
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Matt Lebofsky
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 99
Posts: 1444
Credit: 957,058
RAC: 0
United States
Message 698445 - Posted: 8 Jan 2008, 22:16:52 UTC

So we've been running this annoyingly load-intensive query everyday on the BOINC database to clean up results that failed validation. It took up to an hour to run, during which it hogs a bunch of database memory and slows everything down, including workunit distribution. Why not build an index? Well, indexes still take up disk/memory, and the main table field in question is of low cardinality, and we're only hunting for a few thousand out of a millions of rows each time. So Bob was looking into implementing a new fangled mysql "trigger" to flag the few rows when they enter this bad state, making them much easier to find without needing the overkill of an index. However, we only discovered today triggers don't work in our current version of mysql. So we built an index after all. We'll see how much it helps.

Other than that and the usual database backup outage this morning, mostly spent the day moving large numbers of files/archives around to prepare to grow the workunit storage space again. I also got the new server (maul - see yesterday's note) up to speed, more or less. Still won't be live for at least a day or two, but it's working. It's a 4x2.66 GHz dual core intel with 4 GB of memory. Looks like another perfect web server to me. Also had to grow our home directory space because, as you know, no matter how much space you have, it's never enough.

Somebody pointed to an article that mentioned the Cisco 2811 has a known throughput rated at about 61 Mbps. This was a surprise to me and Jeff - I guess this wasn't what we were told, and you'd think a router with 100 Mbp ports could reach a theoretical maximum of 100 Mbps. The cap seems to be due to CPU limits, and we are doing tunnel encryption and have a small but still non-zero set of access rules. Anyway live and learn. And no further progress on that since yesterday.

Another storm is whizzing through. The top third of a 50 foot tree just broke off right outside my lab window. Cool. I understand why people are freaking out about this current weather, but this is nothing compared to the hurricanes I dealt with growing up in downstate NY.

- Matt

-- BOINC/SETI@home network/web/science/development person
-- "Any idiot can have a good idea. What is hard is to do it." - Jeanne-Claude
ID: 698445 · Report as offensive
KB7RZF
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Aug 99
Posts: 9549
Credit: 3,308,926
RAC: 2
United States
Message 698480 - Posted: 8 Jan 2008, 23:22:50 UTC

Hey Matt,

You've been sending that weather my way. LOL I dunno if any of you folks ski, but the Sierra's got a ton of new snow. Lots of problems caused by this storm, flooding in Reno Nevada, a canal/levee broke 30 miles east of Reno in a small city called Fernley. Flooded about 2 square miles and about 400-500 homes.

Anyhow, keep up the good work.

Jeremy
ID: 698480 · Report as offensive
kittyman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 51468
Credit: 1,018,363,574
RAC: 1,004
United States
Message 698636 - Posted: 9 Jan 2008, 16:22:44 UTC

Looks like we've hit the 60MB glass ceiling on the Cisco again.....
Lots of shorties coming thru.....
Is the multi-dataset splitting still in effect?
"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

ID: 698636 · Report as offensive
Profile Henk Haneveld
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 16 May 99
Posts: 154
Credit: 1,577,293
RAC: 1
Netherlands
Message 698654 - Posted: 9 Jan 2008, 17:40:58 UTC - in response to Message 698636.  
Last modified: 9 Jan 2008, 17:41:54 UTC

Looks like we've hit the 60MB glass ceiling on the Cisco again.....
Lots of shorties coming thru.....
Is the multi-dataset splitting still in effect?


Ignored warning

Currently 6 splitters a working on the same datafile.
ID: 698654 · Report as offensive
Profile Clyde C. Phillips, III

Send message
Joined: 2 Aug 00
Posts: 1851
Credit: 5,955,047
RAC: 0
United States
Message 698667 - Posted: 9 Jan 2008, 18:23:45 UTC - in response to Message 698480.  

Hey Matt,

You've been sending that weather my way. LOL I dunno if any of you folks ski, but the Sierra's got a ton of new snow. Lots of problems caused by this storm, flooding in Reno Nevada, a canal/levee broke 30 miles east of Reno in a small city called Fernley. Flooded about 2 square miles and about 400-500 homes.

Anyhow, keep up the good work.

Jeremy


I heard about the broken levees there. It was on the evening news. They said some kind of rodents were to blame.

ID: 698667 · Report as offensive
Bert

Send message
Joined: 12 Oct 06
Posts: 84
Credit: 813,295
RAC: 0
United States
Message 698668 - Posted: 9 Jan 2008, 18:26:22 UTC - in response to Message 698636.  

Looks like we've hit the 60MB glass ceiling on the Cisco again.....
Lots of shorties coming thru.....
Is the multi-dataset splitting still in effect?


I am not sure if anyone has noticed but those shorties are also coming with a very short deadline. In my modest machine they hit "running with high priority" almost right away and are cleaned up in very short time, leaving longer WUs to run after they are done.

I just got a bunch of shorts with dates around 1/17/08. They will start getting picked off in a couple of days, if they follow the pattern.
ID: 698668 · Report as offensive
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14650
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 698682 - Posted: 9 Jan 2008, 19:08:12 UTC - in response to Message 698668.  

Looks like we've hit the 60MB glass ceiling on the Cisco again.....
Lots of shorties coming thru.....
Is the multi-dataset splitting still in effect?


I am not sure if anyone has noticed but those shorties are also coming with a very short deadline. In my modest machine they hit "running with high priority" almost right away and are cleaned up in very short time, leaving longer WUs to run after they are done.

I just got a bunch of shorts with dates around 1/17/08. They will start getting picked off in a couple of days, if they follow the pattern.

The short WUs have a deadline about eight-and-a-half days after issue - that's standard.

They only go into 'high priority' if you've chosen to specify a 'connect interval' (Computer is connected to the Internet about every, this website, ACCOUNT --> Computing preferences) which is a substantial proportion of those 8.5 days.
ID: 698682 · Report as offensive
Profile Sutaru Tsureku
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 07
Posts: 7105
Credit: 147,663,825
RAC: 5
Germany
Message 705972 - Posted: 30 Jan 2008, 21:17:51 UTC - in response to Message 698445.  

So we've been running this annoyingly load-intensive query everyday on the BOINC database to clean up results that failed validation. It took up to an hour to run, during which it hogs a bunch of database memory and slows everything down, including workunit distribution. ...



At which time (UTC) it's running every day?


ID: 705972 · Report as offensive
Bert

Send message
Joined: 12 Oct 06
Posts: 84
Credit: 813,295
RAC: 0
United States
Message 706433 - Posted: 31 Jan 2008, 23:51:20 UTC - in response to Message 698682.  

Looks like we've hit the 60MB glass ceiling on the Cisco again.....
Lots of shorties coming thru.....
Is the multi-dataset splitting still in effect?


I am not sure if anyone has noticed but those shorties are also coming with a very short deadline. In my modest machine they hit "running with high priority" almost right away and are cleaned up in very short time, leaving longer WUs to run after they are done.

I just got a bunch of shorts with dates around 1/17/08. They will start getting picked off in a couple of days, if they follow the pattern.

The short WUs have a deadline about eight-and-a-half days after issue - that's standard.

They only go into 'high priority' if you've chosen to specify a 'connect interval' (Computer is connected to the Internet about every, this website, ACCOUNT --> Computing preferences) which is a substantial proportion of those 8.5 days.


Actually I took advantage of the information on your post. I tickled the [Computer is connected...] time to force the shorties to run with high priority. For some reason the wingmen also process the shorties fast and I get the unit credited quickly. This also has the side effect of holding the long time units for a while and increases the likelyhood that they will get credit sooner than I usually get after I send them in.

Works for me!
ID: 706433 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Technical News : Windy Day (Jan 08 2008)


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.