Boinc running Seti won't shut down still

Questions and Answers : Unix/Linux : Boinc running Seti won't shut down still
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · Next

AuthorMessage
Dotsch
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 99
Posts: 2422
Credit: 919,393
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 697932 - Posted: 6 Jan 2008, 19:24:34 UTC - in response to Message 697920.  


mike@mike:~/Desktop/BOINC$ grep cpu_usage_limit global_prefs_override.xml
<cpu_usage_limit>100.000000</cpu_usage_limit>
mike@mike:~/Desktop/BOINC$

Hm, which BOINC version do you use ?

Please stop the BOINC client and edit the file global_prefs_override.xml and change the value between <cpu_usage_limit> and </cpu_usage_limit> to the value you wan't. For example : <cpu_usage_limit>70.000000</cpu_usage_limit>
Save the file and start the BOINC client. Did it now work ?
If not please send me the output from the grep command again.

You'r network looks OK. - I only wan't to verify if there are some troubles on the network site.
ID: 697932 · Report as offensive
Slim

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 00
Posts: 55
Credit: 72,370
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 697954 - Posted: 6 Jan 2008, 20:21:53 UTC - in response to Message 697932.  


mike@mike:~/Desktop/BOINC$ grep cpu_usage_limit global_prefs_override.xml
<cpu_usage_limit>100.000000</cpu_usage_limit>
mike@mike:~/Desktop/BOINC$

Hm, which BOINC version do you use ?


Version 5.10.8


Please stop the BOINC client and edit the file global_prefs_override.xml and change the value between <cpu_usage_limit> and </cpu_usage_limit> to the value you wan't. For example : <cpu_usage_limit>70.000000</cpu_usage_limit>
Save the file and start the BOINC client. Did it now work ?


I can't seem to locate that file name in a local search?

Mike
ID: 697954 · Report as offensive
Dotsch
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 99
Posts: 2422
Credit: 919,393
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 697962 - Posted: 6 Jan 2008, 20:28:10 UTC - in response to Message 697954.  
Last modified: 6 Jan 2008, 20:29:21 UTC


mike@mike:~/Desktop/BOINC$ grep cpu_usage_limit global_prefs_override.xml
<cpu_usage_limit>100.000000</cpu_usage_limit>
mike@mike:~/Desktop/BOINC$

Hm, which BOINC version do you use ?


Version 5.10.8

It is a outdated version. Please upgrade to a recent version.


Please stop the BOINC client and edit the file global_prefs_override.xml and change the value between <cpu_usage_limit> and </cpu_usage_limit> to the value you wan't. For example : <cpu_usage_limit>70.000000</cpu_usage_limit>
Save the file and start the BOINC client. Did it now work ?


I can't seem to locate that file name in a local search?

???
Last time you had written, that it is at mike@mike:~/Desktop/BOINC.
ID: 697962 · Report as offensive
Slim

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 00
Posts: 55
Credit: 72,370
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 697963 - Posted: 6 Jan 2008, 20:32:51 UTC - in response to Message 697962.  


mike@mike:~/Desktop/BOINC$ grep cpu_usage_limit global_prefs_override.xml
<cpu_usage_limit>100.000000</cpu_usage_limit>
mike@mike:~/Desktop/BOINC$

Hm, which BOINC version do you use ?


Version 5.10.8

It is a outdated version. Please upgrade to a recent version.


The Boinc site says for Ubuntu users to use the packaged one which is that one. I should get the generic linux one from Boinc then?


???
Last time you had written, that it is at mike@mike:~/Desktop/BOINC.


LOL! Ok, ok, spaced that one out. I was using the GUI search, I went to the terminal and up it came...

I will update Boinc first, thanks.

Mike

ID: 697963 · Report as offensive
Slim

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 00
Posts: 55
Credit: 72,370
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 697974 - Posted: 6 Jan 2008, 20:59:26 UTC - in response to Message 697963.  
Last modified: 6 Jan 2008, 21:32:24 UTC



Hm, which BOINC version do you use ?
Version 5.10.8
It is a outdated version. Please upgrade to a recent version.


I just downloaded 5.10.28 from Boinc but it didn't come with a Boincmgr?

I got a run_client that works, but no manager.

Now what the heck is going on....

(Edit) the other posters are right, it is one Serious pain to install from scratch. I am getting it I think, found the mgr anyway..
Mike
ID: 697974 · Report as offensive
Slim

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 00
Posts: 55
Credit: 72,370
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 697989 - Posted: 6 Jan 2008, 21:41:58 UTC - in response to Message 697974.  



Hm, which BOINC version do you use ?
Version 5.10.8
It is a outdated version. Please upgrade to a recent version.


I just downloaded 5.10.28 from Boinc but it didn't come with a Boincmgr?

I got a run_client that works, but no manager.

Now what the heck is going on....

(Edit) the other posters are right, it is one Serious pain to install from scratch. I am getting it I think, found the mgr anyway..
Mike


I take that back all it found was the old deleted and uninstalled Boinc Manager in the packages.
ID: 697989 · Report as offensive
jharrop

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 08
Posts: 1
Credit: 1,109
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 698009 - Posted: 6 Jan 2008, 22:54:42 UTC

I have the same or a similar problem.

I'm running Ubuntu 7.04 with the packages from the repository. (BOINC Manager is 5.4.11)

My preferences are set to

-- Suspend work while computer is in use? yes
-- 'In use' means mouse/keyboard activity in last 3 minutes

But in BOINC Manager I can see tasks being worked on (even as I type), and Ubuntu's System Monitor shows all 4 cores running at 100%.

If I suspend the projects in BOINC Manager (SETI & climate prediction), CPU usage immediately drops to 0.

So it looks like BOINC Manager is ignoring the preferences?

ID: 698009 · Report as offensive
Slim

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 00
Posts: 55
Credit: 72,370
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 698010 - Posted: 6 Jan 2008, 22:55:26 UTC - in response to Message 697989.  
Last modified: 6 Jan 2008, 23:12:47 UTC



Hm, which BOINC version do you use ?
Version 5.10.8
It is a outdated version. Please upgrade to a recent version.


I just downloaded 5.10.28 from Boinc but it didn't come with a Boincmgr?

I got a run_client that works, but no manager.

Now what the heck is going on....

(Edit) the other posters are right, it is one Serious pain to install from scratch. I am getting it I think, found the mgr anyway..
Mike


I take that back all it found was the old deleted and uninstalled Boinc Manager in the packages.


I am in trouble on the install, I seem to be missing files. I am using the directions in the post for Newbies and am using the terminal because the GUI only finds the old version of the files in their packages.

When I get to one point, I get this:
use /home/mike/BOINC/run_client to start BOINC

That command works from the GUI to open a bunch more files:
mike@mike:~/BOINC$ ls
all_projects_list.xml boinc_cmd client_state.xml run_client
binstall.sh ca-bundle.crt gui_rpc_auth.cfg time_stats_log
boinc client_state_prev.xml lockfile

Now I am lost, I can't find a boincmgr file.

(Edit) I now get this also:

mike@mike:~/BOINC$ locate boincmgr
/usr/share/app-install/icons/boincmgr-32.xpm
mike@mike:~/BOINC$ sudo updatedb
mike@mike:~/BOINC$ locate boincmgr
/home/mike/.Trash/boincmgr
/usr/share/app-install/icons/boincmgr-32.xpm
mike@mike:~/BOINC$

Any help would be appreciated.
Mike
ID: 698010 · Report as offensive
Bryn
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Jun 01
Posts: 85
Credit: 925,923
RAC: 26
United Kingdom
Message 698134 - Posted: 7 Jan 2008, 12:40:36 UTC - in response to Message 697915.  

Yours also appears to be broken 'if' you also have it set to shut off when 'you' are using the machine. It isn't unlatching your CPU either.

No no - the machine remains completely responsive at all times. There's no noticeable difference in the 'feel' of the machine between running BOINC/seti or not running it.
Please remember that 'top' displaying near 100% CPU usage doesn't mean anything is necessarily latched up. :)

it wouldn't have any issues if the program would follow it's 'preferences' and shut off!

I think this is just an indication of problems elsewhere. I've not asked BOINC to do anything special with respect to CPU usage yet it's still perfectly well behaved. (mind you, BOINC may well ignore this setting: it's not something I've ever tweaked - but this isn't what's causing your problem, I'm sure)

To err is human; to moo, bovine.
ID: 698134 · Report as offensive
Bryn
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Jun 01
Posts: 85
Credit: 925,923
RAC: 26
United Kingdom
Message 698147 - Posted: 7 Jan 2008, 14:10:11 UTC - in response to Message 698009.  


But in BOINC Manager I can see tasks being worked on (even as I type), and Ubuntu's System Monitor shows all 4 cores running at 100%.

Here's a dumb test to show what happens with respect to 'top' showing 100% CPU usage. It depends on the installation of 'bc' (an arbitrary precision calculator - a whole 63 kBytes in size) which IIRC gets installed generally along with the base packages but if not, on Ubuntu, just do sudo apt-get install bc

Paste the following into a file in your home directory called cpuloader.sh
--- snip ---
# thrash the CPU using a recursive factorial function f()

# on a 3.06GHz P4 with HT -
# f(1000) takes 30 mS
# f(2000) takes 120 mS
# f(4000) takes 500 mS
# f(10000) takes 3.5 sec
# f(100000) takes 9 min 22 sec

Num=4000
# or pass yer own
[ -z $1 ] || Num=$1

echo "f($Num)"
echo "define f (x) {if (x <= 1) return (1);return (f(x-1) * x);} f($Num)"|bc
--- snip ---

If this is started with no parameter it will default to using 4000 - half a second run time on my P4.

Open a couple of shell windows and after ensuring that BOINC/seti is running, in one of the windows start 'top' with top -d1 which will cause the process list to be updated every second.
You should see seti apparently using ~100% CPU resources.

In the other shell window, run the cpuloader script with sh ./cpuloader.sh 100000
I don't know how quickly this will complete on a multi-core CPU (lucky you!) but it should chug away for at least a couple of minutes. If it's insanely fast, try passing 200000 instead - on my 3.06GHz P4 that makes it run for a slightly silly 30 minutes plus...
(to display the run time instead of reaching for a stopwatch, prepend time to the sh ./ cpuloader.sh ... line)

While it's running (there will be no output until it completes), switch to the shell window running top - where you should see that 'bc' is now loading the CPU and seti has dropped down the list.
On my P3 box, 'top' now shows:
  PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
13110 brian     25   0 13404  11m  476 R 92.9  1.6  15:27.85 bc
12490 brian     39  19 39268  34m    8 R  4.3  4.6 468:16.56 setiathome-5.27

If cpuloader completes while you're watching the output from top, you should see that 'bc' vanishes from the list and seti is once again given the most CPU usage. The basic idea is that if a resource is available then it should be used, with Linux quietly handling the switching between processes clamouring for access to resources according to their priority. This happens many thousands of times a second - much too fast for 'top' and other monitors to give a truly accurate picture. You may even see other processes coming & going on the displayed list - that's because as 'top' grabs a snapshot of the processes, a process just happened to be given a 'run slot' by Linux at the same time.
(you can kill cpuloader.sh with ^C)

I appreciate that BOINC may well be ignoring the limit CPU usage parameters, but I just wanted to demonstrate how process loading of the CPU is still being handled and shared correctly, even though 'top' and friends are apparently showing otherwise.

To err is human; to moo, bovine.
ID: 698147 · Report as offensive
Slim

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 00
Posts: 55
Credit: 72,370
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 698998 - Posted: 10 Jan 2008, 23:35:21 UTC - in response to Message 697932.  


mike@mike:~/Desktop/BOINC$ grep cpu_usage_limit global_prefs_override.xml
<cpu_usage_limit>100.000000</cpu_usage_limit>
mike@mike:~/Desktop/BOINC$

Hm, which BOINC version do you use ?

Please stop the BOINC client and edit the file global_prefs_override.xml and change the value between <cpu_usage_limit> and </cpu_usage_limit> to the value you wan't. For example : <cpu_usage_limit>70.000000</cpu_usage_limit>
Save the file and start the BOINC client. Did it now work ?
If not please send me the output from the grep command again.

You'r network looks OK. - I only wan't to verify if there are some troubles on the network site.


OK, I now have convinced it to only use 50% of my CPU which is a waste really because I only want it working when I am not on it so it should be allowed to use 100%.

I have the Ubuntu manager 5.10.8 and the latest Seti client ver 5.10.28.

Is there a command I can add or edit in global_prefs_override.xml that will shut down the program when my PC is in use?
ID: 698998 · Report as offensive
Profile Toby
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Oct 00
Posts: 1005
Credit: 6,366,949
RAC: 0
United States
Message 699004 - Posted: 10 Jan 2008, 23:59:43 UTC

Hmm this seems to be a slightly bad design but it looks like the "Suspend work while computer is in use?" option is kind of reversed. You can't seem to override it locally unless you have it set to "yes" in your web preferences.

But if you stop BOINC and edit global_prefs.xml (not global_prefs_override.xml) and take out the line that says <run_if_user_active/> and then restart boinc it should stop doing work while you are active. At least it works for me. Of course the problem is that next time your computer reports a result to seti, it will overwrite the global_prefs.xml file and undo your change. However this does mean that the feature works... are you sure you have it set correctly in your global prefs here on the website? Click here and make sure all of the venues you have set up say "yes" on the line that says "Suspend work while computer is in use?"

After you have done that you will need to do an "update" on the client so it picks up the new prefs from the server.

But I'm still curious as to why you are seeing things freeze in the first place. It sounds more like BOINC is stalling your network connection. Your applications and operating system obviously aren't completely locking up since you can still get to BOINC and pause it. It sounds like whenever BOINC is running, you just can't access the internet. So firefox and thunderbird just can't download new web pages or emails but they aren't really "freezing." Wonder if the memory controller or something else in the north bridge is getting too busy to handle I/O requests from your network card or something... I don't think I've ever heard of that happening though.
A member of The Knights Who Say NI!
For rankings, history graphs and more, check out:
My BOINC stats site
ID: 699004 · Report as offensive
Bryn
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Jun 01
Posts: 85
Credit: 925,923
RAC: 26
United Kingdom
Message 699385 - Posted: 11 Jan 2008, 22:49:24 UTC - in response to Message 699004.  

Wonder if the memory controller or something else in the north bridge is getting too busy to handle I/O requests from your network card or something

I had a quick Google for problems related to the ASUS CUV4X and found a selection of "it's great" to "it sucks" reports with nothing usefully specific - but, I'm thinking along the same lines as you - especially as Slim reported similar problems when running the same motherboard under Windows.

I wonder if it's worth removing a couple of SIMMs (or removing whatever's required) to drop the physical memory to say, half its current size, just as a test for motherboard-related memory mapping or I/O weirdness?
Or, try moving the network card to a different slot to force it to pick up a different IRQ.

To err is human; to moo, bovine.
ID: 699385 · Report as offensive
Slim

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 00
Posts: 55
Credit: 72,370
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 699849 - Posted: 13 Jan 2008, 21:12:36 UTC - in response to Message 699004.  

Hmm this seems to be a slightly bad design but it looks like the "Suspend work while computer is in use?" option is kind of reversed. You can't seem to override it locally unless you have it set to "yes" in your web preferences.

But if you stop BOINC and edit global_prefs.xml (not global_prefs_override.xml) and take out the line that says <run_if_user_active/> and then restart boinc it should stop doing work while you are active. At least it works for me. Of course the problem is that next time your computer reports a result to seti, it will overwrite the global_prefs.xml file and undo your change. However this does mean that the feature works... are you sure you have it set correctly in your global prefs here on the website? Click here and make sure all of the venues you have set up say "yes" on the line that says "Suspend work while computer is in use?"


That line does not exist in my global_prefs.xml and it has been turned off on the website, updated, the program Boinc and client totally deleted locally with a new copy downloaded, installed and updated with a new project.

Still no joy.


After you have done that you will need to do an "update" on the client so it picks up the new prefs from the server.

But I'm still curious as to why you are seeing things freeze in the first place. It sounds more like BOINC is stalling your network connection. Your applications and operating system obviously aren't completely locking up since you can still get to BOINC and pause it. It sounds like whenever BOINC is running, you just can't access the internet. So firefox and thunderbird just can't download new web pages or emails but they aren't really "freezing." Wonder if the memory controller or something else in the north bridge is getting too busy to handle I/O requests from your network card or something... I don't think I've ever heard of that happening though.


It is odd and even happened for Netscape back in Windows.

ID: 699849 · Report as offensive
Slim

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 00
Posts: 55
Credit: 72,370
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 699854 - Posted: 13 Jan 2008, 21:44:05 UTC - in response to Message 699385.  

Wonder if the memory controller or something else in the north bridge is getting too busy to handle I/O requests from your network card or something

I had a quick Google for problems related to the ASUS CUV4X and found a selection of "it's great" to "it sucks" reports with nothing usefully specific - but, I'm thinking along the same lines as you - especially as Slim reported similar problems when running the same motherboard under Windows.

I wonder if it's worth removing a couple of SIMMs (or removing whatever's required) to drop the physical memory to say, half its current size, just as a test for motherboard-related memory mapping or I/O weirdness?
Or, try moving the network card to a different slot to force it to pick up a different IRQ.


I have new memory chips and they have been run long on Ubuntu's memory check on the computer's boot screen. I had I/O issues with a USB mouse that affected the ram, but that was found (it was real bad) and the mouse is new as well as the ram.

The network card is the first in the bus. The rest of the machine checks out on Norton Systemworks's diagnostic programs in my windows boot as well as any of the reporting ones in Linux.

I can try a slot swap, but seeing as the network card is now in the second slot with the first one empty, I believe we did that way back when boinc first came out and gave me trouble.

Having a program running rogue through my computer is really not a good thing and turning the program on and off manually gets old fast. I have the PC on all day, 18 hours even and come and go at it and want control when I am on it like Seti@home used to do.

ID: 699854 · Report as offensive
Bryn
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Jun 01
Posts: 85
Credit: 925,923
RAC: 26
United Kingdom
Message 700131 - Posted: 15 Jan 2008, 1:10:10 UTC - in response to Message 699854.  
Last modified: 15 Jan 2008, 1:18:14 UTC


I had I/O issues with a USB mouse that affected the ram, but that was found (it was real bad)

Yep - that's exactly the sort of weirdness I mean. A USB device should just be that: a USB device. Electrically, it's about as boring as a parallel port and for an 'ordinary' thing like a mouse to get as far as affecting the RAM says (to me, any way!) that there's something sinister going on with the motherboard.
I'm not really expecting to find RAM faults as such, just (maybe) some esoteric mapping problems which I think may not be uncovered by a RAM test.

The network card is the first in the bus.

Even so, I still think it's worth swapping it around and halving the physical memory - just to try and nail what's going on with your motherboard.

The rest of the machine checks out on Norton Systemworks's diagnostic programs

Ah yes - but ultimately, nothing checks out correct system functionality quite like running applications! ;)

Having a program running rogue through my computer is really not a good thing

Yes indeed. But it's not BOINC/seti per se which is faulty because surely, this clobbering of 'common' applications like Firefox & Thunderbird would be affecting many more people.
I'm running a box with the same CPU and less RAM than on your system yet I have no problems at all. BOINC/seti might as well not be running for all the difference I can detect in machine behaviour/responsiveness, including Firefox etc., yet I allow it 100% access at all times.
Also, as applications, BOINC/seti don't need to get up to anything really fancy WRT accessing hardware: one is a front-end manager and the other is a maths engine, with both making the odd use of file and net access. Nothing too magical there and likely to be much less busy with the hardware than say, something like KDE (or even that other OS).

But - a true aside...
I once worked for a PC manufacturer which produced its own motherboards and they worked very well. Strangely, one reviewer reported horribly slow RAM benchmarks when comparing against someone else's motherboard using the same support chipset and same CPU. The results should have been virtually identical.

After much head scratching it was eventually discovered that although the benchmark he was using was the same type as other reviewers (who reported no odd timings), his particular release had been compiled using a different library to the other versions. (for reasons known only to the benchmark manufacturer)
There was a trick this particular library was pulling which caused some very odd things to happen with the memory mapping in certain regions - enough to highlight a tiny, TINY design problem with the motherboard.
Fortunately it was relatively easy to fix with BIOS firmware alone and the end result was that all available versions of this benchmark behaved properly with none reporting odd timings.

At no point did any of a range of benchmarks, system and memory tests show up anything odd.
Just this one - yet it was still a hardware problem at the root of it.
To err is human; to moo, bovine.
ID: 700131 · Report as offensive
Slim

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 00
Posts: 55
Credit: 72,370
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 700660 - Posted: 16 Jan 2008, 21:10:28 UTC - in response to Message 700131.  
Last modified: 16 Jan 2008, 21:12:39 UTC


Electrically, it's about as boring as a parallel port and for an 'ordinary' thing like a mouse to get as far as affecting the RAM says (to me, any way!) that there's something sinister going on with the motherboard.
I'm not really expecting to find RAM faults as such, just (maybe) some esoteric mapping problems which I think may not be uncovered by a RAM test.


It was an optic mouse that did use ram, but I see your point.



Having a program running rogue through my computer is really not a good thing


Yes indeed. But it's not BOINC/seti per se which is faulty because surely, this clobbering of 'common' applications like Firefox & Thunderbird would be affecting many more people.

I'm running a box with the same CPU and less RAM than on your system yet I have no problems at all. BOINC/seti might as well not be running for all the difference I can detect in machine behaviour/responsiveness, including Firefox etc., yet I allow it 100% access at all times.


OK, here is the issue.

Can 'you' or anyone else use the preferences to turn off Boinc when 'you' want to use the computer?

So far everyone seems to agree with me that the program is broken, it won't shut off on command.

No one has posted that they 'can' shut it off, only that they can use it when it runs rogue!

I have no income due to being smashed up in a car accident so am likely to have this PC for a bunch more years because it works for 'everything' else without exception except Boinc.

If the 'preferences' actually worked, then I wouldn't have any issues.
ID: 700660 · Report as offensive
Dotsch
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 99
Posts: 2422
Credit: 919,393
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 700689 - Posted: 16 Jan 2008, 23:17:18 UTC - in response to Message 700660.  


Can 'you' or anyone else use the preferences to turn off Boinc when 'you' want to use the computer?

Yes.


So far everyone seems to agree with me that the program is broken, it won't shut off on command.

No. As we have seen at the last try, there is a problem in the outdated BOINC client version 5.10.8, which you are using, that the preferences are not updated. As I have written before, please update to a version which fix this problem.
You could also copy over the BOINC client from the actual offical release to your BOINC directory and use the old BOINC manager from the Ubuntu distribution.
Please did not complain permanently about fixed bugs and things we already has noticed and fixed in newer versions.


No one has posted that they 'can' shut it off, only that they can use it when it runs rogue!

Works everything well for me. As may others has posted before, there could be an issue and a stress test of the hardware is recommended from a lot of peoples. It is no problem to run SETI with 100%, because the SETI application is running at the lowest priority and the OS scheduler sort this out. -> see Bryn's example, which explains this behavior excelent.
So there must be an issue with your system.


I have no income due to being smashed up in a car accident so am likely to have this PC for a bunch more years because it works for 'everything' else without exception except Boinc.

If the 'preferences' actually worked, then I wouldn't have any issues.

See above.

Btw. I am still waiting on some awnsers of my last questions, how exaclty the system slows down at which actions and what happens if you make a stress test.
ID: 700689 · Report as offensive
Slim

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 00
Posts: 55
Credit: 72,370
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 700824 - Posted: 17 Jan 2008, 16:15:47 UTC - in response to Message 700689.  


Can 'you' or anyone else use the preferences to turn off Boinc when 'you' want to use the computer?

Yes.


So far everyone seems to agree with me that the program is broken, it won't shut off on command.

No. As we have seen at the last try, there is a problem in the outdated BOINC client version 5.10.8, which you are using, that the preferences are not updated. As I have written before, please update to a version which fix this problem.


That is one 'big' problem, there is no update to the 5.10.8 Boincmgr for Ubuntu. I 'tried' to use the updated program on the Boinc site, boinc_5.10.28_i686-pc-linux-gnu.sh, but it does not have the boincmgr file included. That 'update' therefore does not 'work' for my issue.

So I went back to a fresh install of the Ubuntu package 5.10.8 'boincmgr' with 5.10.28 client installed.

Apparently this still does not work. It 'does' allow the CPU use to be changed though which the old one didn't so it's 'halfway' fixed.

What other options do I have?


You could also copy over the BOINC client from the actual offical release to your BOINC directory and use the old BOINC manager from the Ubuntu distribution.
Please did not complain permanently about fixed bugs and things we already has noticed and fixed in newer versions.


I have not been able to locate a 'fixed' program. THAT IS WHY I AM HERE. Sorry for shouting, but geese it gets frustrating going around in circles.


So there must be an issue with your system.


See above.


Btw. I am still waiting on some awnsers of my last questions, how exaclty the system slows down at which actions and what happens if you make a stress test.


My firefox and my Thunderbird 'hang' when trying to connect to a website or Usenet server with boinc and seti running. The little circle up in the right corner just keeps on spinning and spinning and... When I suspend the project, the 'hang' instantly goes away and I connect. Happened yesterday on the first page I tried to access after I fired up Boinc and Seti and it is only using 50% of my CPU now.

It passes the grub memory burn test and Norton's hardware burn test run from a disk.

I wasn't able to get that prime program, the sites were all down. I could try that again, but again if I could 'find' an updated boincmgr that actually worked, I would not be having any issues.

If you could point me to a working version of Boincmgr it would be greatly appreciated.

Meanwhile I will see about trying to get prime again and will swap slots on my network card but it seems like a waste of time seeing as I cannot find a working Boincmgr. Even if my system didn't care about an uncontrollable program running, I do.

ID: 700824 · Report as offensive
Slim

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 00
Posts: 55
Credit: 72,370
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 700831 - Posted: 17 Jan 2008, 16:53:52 UTC - in response to Message 700824.  


Meanwhile I will see about trying to get prime again and will swap slots on my network card but it seems like a waste of time seeing as I cannot find a working Boincmgr. Even if my system didn't care about an uncontrollable program running, I do.


OK, I changed my network card's position on the buss. It only has a new sound card on that PCI buss, my old sound card was ISA. The rest of the slots are empty.

No joy for either the new buss position or getting prime. Google.ca hung with Boinc running, I suspended and the page opened right up.

Meanwhile prime95 doesn't seem to exist anymore.

ID: 700831 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · Next

Questions and Answers : Unix/Linux : Boinc running Seti won't shut down still


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.