Different Cache For O/S?

Message boards : Number crunching : Different Cache For O/S?

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Sirius B
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 14926
Credit: 2,128,562
RAC: 621
Ireland
Message 658029 - Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 22:37:27 UTC

All my systems have the same settings - A cache of 5 days.

Unfortunately, the 2 linux boxes have only had 2 wu's at a time.

Is this down to the o/s or boinc/s@h?


ID: 658029 · Report as offensive
Alinator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Apr 05
Posts: 4178
Credit: 4,647,982
RAC: 0
United States
Message 658065 - Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 22:59:28 UTC
Last modified: 11 Oct 2007, 22:59:54 UTC

I'd say it has more to do with the hosts being new and the RDCF hasn't adjusted enough yet. Give it some more time and they should do better.

Alinator

ID: 658065 · Report as offensive
Sirius B
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 14926
Credit: 2,128,562
RAC: 621
Ireland
Message 658082 - Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 23:40:07 UTC - in response to Message 658065.

I'd say it has more to do with the hosts being new and the RDCF hasn't adjusted enough yet. Give it some more time and they should do better.

Alinator


Thanks Alinator

ID: 658082 · Report as offensive
John McLeod VII
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 99
Posts: 24806
Credit: 754,585
RAC: 65
United States
Message 658125 - Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 0:45:41 UTC

It is also possible it is caused by EDF. If you have work that may miss deadline based on current estimates, BOINC will not download any work from the project with trouble, and will not add any work over the minimum queue even from other projects.




BOINC WIKI

ID: 658125 · Report as offensive
seaking57Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Nov 01
Posts: 12
Credit: 50,254,102
RAC: 68,484
United States
Message 658151 - Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 1:20:59 UTC

My Linux boxes are doing the same thing there only holding a cache of about 2 to 6 work units. Yet my windows boxes are holding a nice cache for a few days. I guess they'll work them selves out in time.


ID: 658151 · Report as offensive
DJStarfox

Send message
Joined: 23 May 01
Posts: 1057
Credit: 802,388
RAC: 86
United States
Message 658492 - Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 18:28:26 UTC - in response to Message 658029.

All my systems have the same settings - A cache of 5 days.

Unfortunately, the 2 linux boxes have only had 2 wu's at a time.

Is this down to the o/s or boinc/s@h?


Are they all running the same version of BOINC? Remember that 5.10.x clients and above pay attention to the "cache additional days" setting, but previous versions do not.

ID: 658492 · Report as offensive
Sirius B
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 14926
Credit: 2,128,562
RAC: 621
Ireland
Message 660592 - Posted: 16 Oct 2007, 15:18:50 UTC - in response to Message 658492.

All my systems have the same settings - A cache of 5 days.

Unfortunately, the 2 linux boxes have only had 2 wu's at a time.

Is this down to the o/s or boinc/s@h?


Are they all running the same version of BOINC? Remember that 5.10.x clients and above pay attention to the "cache additional days" setting, but previous versions do not.


Sorry for the delay in replying DJ, It's been hectic here at the moment.

All Windows boxes have 5.10.20 & Linux boxes 5.8.16.

ID: 660592 · Report as offensive
DJStarfox

Send message
Joined: 23 May 01
Posts: 1057
Credit: 802,388
RAC: 86
United States
Message 661248 - Posted: 17 Oct 2007, 13:29:55 UTC - in response to Message 660592.

All Windows boxes have 5.10.20 & Linux boxes 5.8.16.


That explains it. Set the "Connect to network every x days" to 5 days. Set the "cache additional" setting to zero. The versions should behave more similar with these settings.

ID: 661248 · Report as offensive
Alinator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Apr 05
Posts: 4178
Credit: 4,647,982
RAC: 0
United States
Message 661254 - Posted: 17 Oct 2007, 13:55:19 UTC
Last modified: 17 Oct 2007, 13:56:02 UTC

An alternative is to set up one of the named venues to run decoupled for the Win boxes and another one to run in cache coupled mode for the Linux ones.

Keep in mind if you use the named venues, there's a bug in the web interface for the current server side builds for the battery and in use global prefs (basically totally broken), but you can override that with the local preference, or a global_prefs_overide file (for 5.8.16).

Alinator

ID: 661254 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : Different Cache For O/S?


 
©2016 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.