multiple tasks

Questions and Answers : Preferences : multiple tasks
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Luuklag

Send message
Joined: 13 Sep 07
Posts: 1
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 642161 - Posted: 16 Sep 2007, 8:08:09 UTC

hey guys, im running seti and rosetta with boinc manager, but i can only run 1 at a time, although my computer should easely handle 2 at the same time, is there a way they could run each 1 project at the same time?

Luuklag
ID: 642161 · Report as offensive
OzzFan Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15691
Credit: 84,761,841
RAC: 28
United States
Message 642241 - Posted: 16 Sep 2007, 11:34:06 UTC

You can only run one project per CPU. You have a single core processor so you can only run one at a time. If you upgrade to a dual core, you'll be able to run two. If you upgrade to a quad core, then you can run four.

Running more than one on a single core nets no benefits.
ID: 642241 · Report as offensive
Profile caesar243

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 3
Credit: 7,201
RAC: 0
Romania
Message 642584 - Posted: 16 Sep 2007, 20:08:21 UTC - in response to Message 642241.  

You can only run one project per CPU. You have a single core processor so you can only run one at a time. If you upgrade to a dual core, you'll be able to run two. If you upgrade to a quad core, then you can run four.

Running more than one on a single core nets no benefits.


> .. so running a VM with a BOINC inside ain`t getting better results? :D

Q6600 - 4 Gb RAM ( only 3, 2 detected by ^32 Vista )

is there any ..optimized version for Quads?
ID: 642584 · Report as offensive
OzzFan Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15691
Credit: 84,761,841
RAC: 28
United States
Message 642735 - Posted: 17 Sep 2007, 0:07:52 UTC - in response to Message 642584.  

> .. so running a VM with a BOINC inside ain`t getting better results? :D


I've seen no data that suggest that it does. After all, they're still using the same physical processor.

Q6600 - 4 Gb RAM ( only 3, 2 detected by ^32 Vista )

is there any ..optimized version for Quads?


For optimized clients, check out http://lunatics.at. However, most of the optimizations have made it into the most recent stock app (such as SSEx support).
ID: 642735 · Report as offensive
John McLeod VII
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 99
Posts: 24806
Credit: 790,712
RAC: 0
United States
Message 642739 - Posted: 17 Sep 2007, 0:20:15 UTC - in response to Message 642584.  

You can only run one project per CPU. You have a single core processor so you can only run one at a time. If you upgrade to a dual core, you'll be able to run two. If you upgrade to a quad core, then you can run four.

Running more than one on a single core nets no benefits.


> .. so running a VM with a BOINC inside ain`t getting better results? :D

Q6600 - 4 Gb RAM ( only 3, 2 detected by ^32 Vista )

is there any ..optimized version for Quads?

No, it doesn't.

The applications are CPU bound for the most part and do very little IO. Every context switch takes away from the processing time the application would get. Since the VM is running on the same physical hardware and the VM has to emulate some stuff, it is actually slower than running on the directly hosted OS.

Most people think of responsiveness when getting a feel for how many programs can be run at once because most of the time for most of the applications the computer is waiting for the human to catch up. This is not true of BOINC processes - they spend no time waiting for the human to catch up, and a single process does use 100% of the available CPU time from a single CPU.


BOINC WIKI
ID: 642739 · Report as offensive

Questions and Answers : Preferences : multiple tasks


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.