Arbitrators Required |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Politics : Arbitrators Required
1 · 2 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
As S@H is international & (hopefully) we are all human - we tend to make mistakes every so often. | |
| ID: 624901 · | |
|
| |
| ID: 624905 · | |
|
Oh no, Mike, that would mean the project would lose face and we can't have that, can we? | |
| ID: 624908 · | |
|
shouldn't moderators be kind of arbitrators themselves? | |
| ID: 624910 · | |
shouldn't moderators be kind of arbitrators themselves? It was my original understanding that on a forum such as this, the two terms were to be virtually synonymous. (Rush, any objections to the theoretical idea?) I do not volunteer. ____________ Account ... | |
| ID: 624912 · | |
It was my original understanding that on a forum such as this, the two terms were to be virtually synonymous. (Rush, any objections to the theoretical idea?) Eh, it is the level of control (and the emotional incompetence often demonstrated) that causes most of the problems here. Adding further (and inviolate) levels of control likely just exacerbates the problem. As I've said before, those of you that use the red x have created the problem, because by your actions you want control brought down on others. You got what you wanted (Mac put under control), so you should be thrilled. Instead of realizing that Mac probably had a bad day, there were any number of you out there red x'ing away. You know, to save the rest of us and to make sure the Post was Closed for Further Review. You know, because that helps save the internet for the Restivus. ____________ Cordially, Rush elrushbo2@theobviousgmail.com Remove the obvious... | |
| ID: 624921 · | |
|
As I am a forum administrator myself, I have to say that moderators are arbitrators only in theory. In practice however, many moderators tend to play with their "power", most often not realizing their own mistakes. | |
| ID: 624932 · | |
As I am a forum administrator myself, I have to say that moderators are arbitrators only in theory. In practice however, many moderators tend to play with their "power", most often not realizing their own mistakes. Hi Helsionium - Well said! | |
| ID: 624934 · | |
As I am a forum administrator myself, I have to say that moderators are arbitrators only in theory. In practice however, many moderators tend to play with their "power", most often not realizing their own mistakes. I understood everything you said here. I also just read your profile. Again, I understood everything. Furthermore, reading somewhat quickly, I do not see any errors in either place. So, maybe you do not need to be so reluctant? We have several moderators from countries where English is not the primary language. If this has helped ease your reluctance some, would you really be willing to offer your services by joining the moderator team? (Note: you will need to have enough time.) ____________ Account ... | |
| ID: 624935 · | |
|
Well, I actually know that my English isn't bad, but I'm in constant fear of saying something that I didn't intend to say... That happens quite frequently to me, even in my native language... | |
| ID: 624951 · | |
Well, I actually know that my English isn't bad, but I'm in constant fear of saying something that I didn't intend to say... That happens quite frequently to me, even in my native language... Understood. If you change your mind, tell us and we'll let you know how to contact an administrator for offering your services. ____________ Account ... | |
| ID: 624952 · | |
Oh no, Mike, that would mean the project would lose face and we can't have that, can we? No ... the forum associated with the project might. Once again, the strong links between the project and the forums many of us, or the public that reads but does not crunch or post, make are just that: too strong. ____________ Account ... | |
| ID: 624954 · | |
|
I worked in an abattoir as a student for my summer holiday pocket money once, so I'm a qualified volunteer. I think I maybe pressed the red x twice in my whole time on all the BOINC boards, and still the bomb didn't go off. | |
| ID: 624955 · | |
|
What brilliant minded person moved this into here...politics. | |
| ID: 625046 · | |
What brilliant minded person moved this into here...politics. Well, if you think twice, you will realize that it's possible to see it that way, that even this is politics: the politics of interaction between persons on an Internet message board ;) ____________ Account frozen... | |
| ID: 625087 · | |
What brilliant minded person moved this into here...politics. Discussion of moderation policy is supposed to be in the Politics forum. | |
| ID: 625141 · | |
What brilliant minded person moved this into here...politics. Show me where anyone has discussed moderation policy? ____________ http://www.mikesbawx.org/photo/ | |
| ID: 625190 · | |
What brilliant minded person moved this into here...politics. Noblesse Oblige ____________ Account frozen... | |
| ID: 625206 · | |
What brilliant minded person moved this into here...politics. Welcome Back Dogbytes. Hope you are well. I could not find any info as to where certain topics should be discussed, so entered the Cafe Seti as I was unaware that this matter was political. Ah Well...You live & learn! | |
| ID: 625212 · | |
What brilliant minded person moved this into here...politics. I beg your pardon, Michael, but this thread is all about moderation policy. What do you think these proposed "arbitrators" would be arbitrating? The initial post in the thread points out that moderators can make mistakes (I certainly agree), thus Mr. Daly seems to think that [an additional number of] arbitrators are required (but as for that, I do not agree). | |
| ID: 625251 · | |
Message boards : Politics : Arbitrators Required
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |