Optimized FreeBSD Builds?

Message boards : Number crunching : Optimized FreeBSD Builds?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Elshar

Send message
Joined: 10 Sep 99
Posts: 3
Credit: 2,127,418
RAC: 0
United States
Message 617614 - Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 19:22:07 UTC

Hey guys,

I've got a quad Xeon box that's running the amd64 version of freebsd, and I'd like to use the optimized build, but I can't seem to run the optimized 32-bit one for my proc (It always dies and core dumps).

I've tried installing a 32-bit userland, and making sure I have 32-bit compat on in the kernel. I guess what I really need is a 64 bit optimized bin that's geared towards intel instead of amd.

Oh, and before anyone knocks my running a quad xeon on an "amd64" build of freebsd, that's just the original name of the arch. The EM64T intel procs run just fine with it.

My problem seems to be that the 64 bit builds are geared for AMD's. I was running a non-optimized amd64 build, but it seemed my dual 2.4 proc box was outperforming my quad xeon without even running an optimized version.

Maybe I'm wrong. I'm going to try using an optimized 32 bit version for linux (Got the compat linux stuff), but I'd really like to try a native version.

I suppose in the end I should probably make my own build. I just didn't want to redo someone else's efforts. :)
ID: 617614 · Report as offensive
Profile Crunch3r
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Apr 99
Posts: 1546
Credit: 3,438,823
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 617655 - Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 21:33:00 UTC - in response to Message 617614.  

Hey guys,

I've got a quad Xeon box that's running the amd64 version of freebsd, and I'd like to use the optimized build, but I can't seem to run the optimized 32-bit one for my proc (It always dies and core dumps).

I've tried installing a 32-bit userland, and making sure I have 32-bit compat on in the kernel. I guess what I really need is a 64 bit optimized bin that's geared towards intel instead of amd.

Oh, and before anyone knocks my running a quad xeon on an "amd64" build of freebsd, that's just the original name of the arch. The EM64T intel procs run just fine with it.

My problem seems to be that the 64 bit builds are geared for AMD's. I was running a non-optimized amd64 build, but it seemed my dual 2.4 proc box was outperforming my quad xeon without even running an optimized version.

Maybe I'm wrong. I'm going to try using an optimized 32 bit version for linux (Got the compat linux stuff), but I'd really like to try a native version.

I suppose in the end I should probably make my own build. I just didn't want to redo someone else's efforts. :)


Hi,

ok i've read your post a few times. still it's kinda cunfusing me :-(
by optimized apps you mean those available on lunatics.at for FreeBSD?
If so those where build on FreeBSD 6.2 STABLE (i build them).

Are you familiar with running a standalone test ? If so i need to see the exact error messages of the app and an output of "ldd setiathome-5.15.i386-unknown-freebsd "...

regarding those 64 bit freebsd apps. i can compile them, you just need a little patience ;)




Join BOINC United now!
ID: 617655 · Report as offensive
Profile speedimic
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Sep 02
Posts: 362
Credit: 16,590,653
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 617656 - Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 21:34:34 UTC
Last modified: 10 Aug 2007, 21:36:11 UTC

I think Crunch3r already made a FreeBSD port...

look here lunatics.at.

But watch out for the new 2.4 version (multibeam) wich will be released very soon!

EDIT: I gues I'm typing a little slow... Cruncher is faster - as always. ;)
mic.


ID: 617656 · Report as offensive
Profile Crunch3r
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Apr 99
Posts: 1546
Credit: 3,438,823
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 617657 - Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 21:41:03 UTC - in response to Message 617656.  
Last modified: 10 Aug 2007, 21:41:19 UTC


EDIT: I gues I'm typing a little slow... Cruncher is faster - as always. ;)


Hehe ;)
Ich lade grade die 64bit ISOs von freeBSD 6.2 runter.
Mal sehen, was da geht ;)






Join BOINC United now!
ID: 617657 · Report as offensive
Elshar

Send message
Joined: 10 Sep 99
Posts: 3
Credit: 2,127,418
RAC: 0
United States
Message 617693 - Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 23:35:17 UTC

Bah. I must be tired. Yea, I was just wondering if someone had a 64 bit version for freebsd optimized for Xeon-class procs. :)
ID: 617693 · Report as offensive
Profile Crunch3r
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Apr 99
Posts: 1546
Credit: 3,438,823
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 617697 - Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 23:40:34 UTC - in response to Message 617693.  

Bah. I must be tired. Yea, I was just wondering if someone had a 64 bit version for freebsd optimized for Xeon-class procs. :)


Yeah, happens some times. However you could try the 32 bit optimized ones OR wait a few days till i've set up the 64 bit FreeBSD 6.2 in vmware,to get a native 64 bit application ;)




Join BOINC United now!
ID: 617697 · Report as offensive
Profile Rene
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 30 Jan 01
Posts: 25
Credit: 690,805
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 617957 - Posted: 11 Aug 2007, 12:13:35 UTC - in response to Message 617614.  

Hey guys,

I've got a quad Xeon box that's running the amd64 version of freebsd, and I'd like to use the optimized build, but I can't seem to run the optimized 32-bit one for my proc (It always dies and core dumps).

I've tried installing a 32-bit userland, and making sure I have 32-bit compat on in the kernel. I guess what I really need is a 64 bit optimized bin that's geared towards intel instead of amd.

My problem seems to be that the 64 bit builds are geared for AMD's. I was running a non-optimized amd64 build, but it seemed my dual 2.4 proc box was outperforming my quad xeon without even running an optimized version.


You can try the ports version in astro/boinc-setiathome-enhanced (source build). If you set CPUTYPE correct in /etc/make.conf, it automatically optimizes for your box. It's currently at version 5.13, but I'm testing 5.27 now. The 5.13 version easily outperforms the stock Windows client.

ID: 617957 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : Optimized FreeBSD Builds?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.