Seti's Carbon Footprint |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Seti's Carbon Footprint
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Leaving on your computer all day to analyse Seti signals increases your carbon footprint. Is this a concern? Should we be turning off our computer at every opportunity to conserve energy and reduce global warming? | |
| ID: 601770 · | |
|
I have thought a little about that, and read some previous discussions, and at least for me personally I came up with only more questions: | |
| ID: 601775 · | |
Leaving on your computer all day to analyse Seti signals increases your carbon footprint. Is this a concern? Should we be turning off our computer at every opportunity to conserve energy and reduce global warming? As far as I'm concerned we shouldn't until we know for a FACT if it is CO2 or something else. (see my post here) BoB ____________ Do you Good Search for Seti@Home? http://www.goodsearch.com/?charityid=888957 Or Good Shop? http://www.goodshop.com/?charityid=888957 | |
| ID: 601980 · | |
Leaving on your computer all day to analyse Seti signals increases your carbon footprint. Is this a concern? Should we be turning off our computer at every opportunity to conserve energy and reduce global warming? My feeling is that the carbon footprint of SETI@HOME would be tiny compared to the massive waste of energy in cities. Google for pictures of any city at night. Lights left on needlessly in all sorts of buildings, large amounts used in useless advertising. Who reads ads while driving at night? Google for images of the earth at night, 99.99999% of those lights are not essential and could be turned off saving huge amounts of energy. All most of them do is generate CO2 and cause massive light pollution. Another huge saving could be made by avoiding the daily commute, many thousands of cars mostly with only one person, caught in gridlock spewing tons of CO2. What's wrong with public transport? Deforestation, the second largest cause of CO2 emission, could be easily controlled. Pay the poor to stop doing it. The list of things that could be done is huge. SETI@HOME would, IMO, be very close to the bottom of said list. They are all small changes that could save huge amounts of CO2 emissions but I doubt if any will be done in my lifetime. Too many "rights" abused etc. Oh well, that's my two bobs worth. ____________ Qunpu' lo'taHmo' jIH yItamQo' | |
| ID: 608431 · | |
|
Since I do leave my computers on pretty much all the time, I signed up for Green Electricity. Here in Australia, it's a Government regulated scheme that basically guarantees your power comes from renewable generation, not coal (we have no nuclear here). | |
| ID: 608455 · | |
|
I just started running a Mac Pro 8 core 24/7 (for Einstein@Home until the mac issues here are sorted out). My carbon footprint definitely has gone up. I think the thing will heat my house this fall and winter. But if I don't have to run my furnace as often, I guess maybe that kind of evens things out a bit. | |
| ID: 633226 · | |
|
I've been reading this thread and have been wondering my self for quite some time about the power used by a computer running 24/7 and did some sums. If you go by what your PSU is rated to then you are getting a maximum value, in my case that is 18kW/h a day (750w PSU * 24 hours = 18000W). The problem in useing this figure is that firstly it assumes that the computer is drawing maximum power all the time, ie. all hard drives, cd rom drives, floppy drives, graphics cards, case fans,cpu fans running flat out 24/7 which doesnt happen. also it assumes that your PSU is the exact size for your system. i know mines is bigger than i need cos i bought one 150W bigger than recommended so that i would be able to up grade at a later date. it also doesn't take into account the power the monitor draws. | |
| ID: 637033 · | |
|
What wrong with public transport? Well. It doesn't go to where I need it to go. I carpool as much as I can and WOULD rather take the train, but it don't go where I need it to go. Leaving on your computer all day to analyse Seti signals increases your carbon footprint. Is this a concern? Should we be turning off our computer at every opportunity to conserve energy and reduce global warming? ____________ | |
| ID: 668246 · | |
|
Seti's carbon footprint issue solved... | |
| ID: 668441 · | |
|
One way to reduce energy consumption and darken the night skies would be to fit every light with a properly-designed reflector that would hide the light everywhere above about 5 degrees below horizontal. This would reduce glare, too. The International Dark-Sky Association (IDA) advocates things like this. Actually IDA said 20 degrees but I think that's taking it too far. | |
| ID: 668953 · | |
Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Seti's Carbon Footprint
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |