Message boards :
Science (non-SETI) :
Massive database of all species to be put online
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Misfit Send message Joined: 21 Jun 01 Posts: 21804 Credit: 2,815,091 RAC: 0 |
By Seth Borenstein ASSOCIATED PRESS May 9, 2007 WASHINGTON – In a whale-sized project, the world's scientists plan to compile everything they know about all of Earth's 1.8 million known species and put it all on one Web site, open to everyone. The effort, called the Encyclopedia of Life, will include species descriptions, pictures, maps, videos, sound, sightings by amateurs, and links to entire genomes and scientific journal papers. Its first pages of information will be shown today in Washington where the massive effort is being announced by some of the world's leading scientific institutions and universities. The project will take about 10 years to complete and fill about 300 million pages. “It's an interactive zoo,†said James Edwards, the encyclopedia's executive director. The MacArthur and Sloan foundations have given $12.5 million to pay for the first 2½ years of the effort, but it will be free and accessible to everyone. The pages can be adjusted so that they provide useful information for a schoolchild or a research biologist. While amateurs can contribute in clearly marked side pages, the key detail and science parts of the encyclopedia will be compiled and reviewed by experts. “It could be a very big leap in the way we do science,†said Cristian Samper, acting secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, one of seven museums, universities and labs to launch the encyclopedia. Other institutions helping head the undertaking include Harvard University, Chicago's Field Museum, the Marine Biological Laboratory in Massachusetts, the Biodiversity Heritage Library Consortium, the Missouri Botanical Garden and the Atlas of Living Australia. http://www.eol.org/ me@rescam.org |
thorin belvrog Send message Joined: 29 Sep 06 Posts: 6418 Credit: 8,893 RAC: 0 |
By Seth Borenstein Together with genom probes (to eventually be able to clone them) it would be the 21st century kind of Noah's Ark :) Account frozen... |
Hellasverona Send message Joined: 28 Oct 02 Posts: 2 Credit: 87,088 RAC: 0 |
Look like a very very big project!! Too bad it's only a demo for now. I wondered if there was something similar on the web. Pages on wikipedia are dedicated to a similar project http://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Ciao |
Jason Safoutin Send message Joined: 8 Sep 05 Posts: 1386 Credit: 200,389 RAC: 0 |
I have a video they made in my blog. No download required. The Encyclopedia of Life (Video is most recent post) Comprehensive, collaborative, ever-growing, and personalized, the Encyclopedia of Life is an ecosystem of websites that makes all key information about life on Earth accessible to anyone, anywhere in the world. Our goal is to create a constantly evolving encyclopedia that lives on the Internet, with contributions from scientists and amateurs alike. To transform the science of biology, and inspire a new generation of scientists, by aggregating all known data about every living species. And ultimately, to increase our collective understanding of life on Earth, and safeguard the richest possible spectrum of biodiversity. "By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible". Hebrews 11.3 |
Airbuster Send message Joined: 22 Nov 05 Posts: 115 Credit: 1,342 RAC: 0 |
What do we need this for when we already have all the information we could want at our fingertips. Sure, it's not all in one place but that's why we have search-engines. Also, how will we know wether the information being presented is accurate? As this is govt-funded, the information will be tainted by politics. It's best to get your info from more than one source. Waste of money, I say. |
Airbuster Send message Joined: 22 Nov 05 Posts: 115 Credit: 1,342 RAC: 0 |
I'll bet they'll only allow members who toe a certain political line, namely the radical-environmentalist agenda, using our tax-dollars. Censorship, not convenience, is the reason it's being put forward, and I quote from the article: "While amateurs can contribute in clearly marked side pages, the key detail and science parts of the encyclopedia will be compiled and reviewed by experts." Yes, "experts" who get their money from power-hungry politicians. |
Jason Safoutin Send message Joined: 8 Sep 05 Posts: 1386 Credit: 200,389 RAC: 0 |
I'll bet they'll only allow members who toe a certain political line, namely the radical-environmentalist agenda, using our tax-dollars. If you read their site you will see that it will be like a "wiki" and anyone anywhere can collaborate. Their goal is to get the scientists involved too...not just me and you. And you can also sign up as well. "By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible". Hebrews 11.3 |
Airbuster Send message Joined: 22 Nov 05 Posts: 115 Credit: 1,342 RAC: 0 |
But the opinion of someone not on a govt payroll will be dubbed an "amateur opinion" by the website, and I bet they'll make it easy for users to filter out "amateur opinions". |
Jason Safoutin Send message Joined: 8 Sep 05 Posts: 1386 Credit: 200,389 RAC: 0 |
:Says who? Or is this your opinion. "By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible". Hebrews 11.3 |
Airbuster Send message Joined: 22 Nov 05 Posts: 115 Credit: 1,342 RAC: 0 |
My opinion. |
Jim Franklin Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 108 Credit: 10,843,395 RAC: 39 |
But opinions of this type will be blocked as they are unhelpful. Political opinions taint all aspects of life, but at least give the researchers the opportunity to prove you right or wrong before condemning them.. |
Ally Ein Send message Joined: 18 Feb 07 Posts: 49 Credit: 397 RAC: 0 |
They should start in the oceans As I've always heard it, we've sent more expeditions to other planets in outer space, than to our own oceans Which reminds me, how deep would the sea be if there were no sponges? |
MeltWreckage Send message Joined: 16 Mar 07 Posts: 293 Credit: 15,951 RAC: 0 |
this is such a cool project!! I'm proud of our species (humans, that is) for embracing such a noble endeavor! that would have worked if you hadn't stopped me |
Sarge Send message Joined: 25 Aug 99 Posts: 12273 Credit: 8,569,109 RAC: 79 |
They should start in the oceans The depth would obviously remain the same. On the other hand, if sponges could have that much effect, the question should be how high might the water levels go? Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes. |
Ally Ein Send message Joined: 18 Feb 07 Posts: 49 Credit: 397 RAC: 0 |
You have to take displacement into consideration. If you put any object into a container of water the volume would increase. So what would be the volume of the ocean if all the sponges were taken out? On another thought, what would be the depth of the ocean if the whales were taken out? (On yet another thought, they are, by fishermen, water pollution, and global warming) |
Andreas Send message Joined: 22 Jan 05 Posts: 96 Credit: 1,121,491 RAC: 0 |
This sounds a bit like the Tree of Life Project |
MrGray Send message Joined: 17 Aug 05 Posts: 3170 Credit: 60,411 RAC: 0 |
bump "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.