Way off topic #1 - Recommended Viewing |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : SETI@home Staff Blog : Way off topic #1 - Recommended Viewing
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Okay.. lest I keep hijacking other staff members' threads I better start my own for once. | |
| ID: 530546 · | |
|
I halfway expected it to be in a grocery store with a bulletin board in the front filled with lovely pics. | |
| ID: 530665 · | |
I halfway expected it to be in a grocery store with a bulletin board in the front filled with lovely pics. We can't have that, can we?! The lovely pics I mean... ____________ "I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me | |
| ID: 530876 · | |
I halfway expected it to be in a grocery store with a bulletin board in the front filled with lovely pics. Certainly not. That would be creepy. ____________ | |
| ID: 531026 · | |
I halfway expected it to be in a grocery store with a bulletin board in the front filled with lovely pics. Very! ____________ "I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me | |
| ID: 531226 · | |
The access to quality food is one of the few things keeping me in California, so I find this stuff interesting. Have fun! (auto updates) ____________ | |
| ID: 531581 · | |
|
I didn't get around to the webcast yet but I read the article and found it interesting. I'll comment on a couple of the statements: | |
| ID: 531705 · | |
One factor to remember (which is mentioned in the webcast) is that Americans pay *far* less for food on average than the rest of the world. If everyone coughed up the "extra" change to buy organic/local/ethical food they'd still be paying less than most of their international counterparts. One problem, I think, is that American food advertising is focused on quantity and not quality. This is actually kinda gross when you think about it. I'd rather get a good deal on a mattress, or a box of nails, but why are people so willing to save 20 cents to put completely processed unhealthy junk inside their bodies? With the disparaty of incomes in this country such as it is right now, this food movement can only be driven by those with the higher salaries, but hopefully this will be enough to enact some kind of change, and I think that's what Mackey is working towards. Or he just found a great niche market. - Matt ____________ -- BOINC/SETI@home network/web/science/development person -- "Any idiot can have a good idea. What is hard is to do it." - Jeanne-Claude | |
| ID: 531719 · | |
I think he's found a great niche market. What most consumers want in this country (at least as far as produce) is pretty food. So, most farmers grow varieties that can be picked a little early, and will last several days going from the farm to the market. Taste is secondary. If the average consumer wanted taste, then maybe the farmers would grow varieties that tasted good. We shop at the local Farmer's Market. Apples (for example) do not look perfect, but they taste incredibly good. ____________ | |
| ID: 531732 · | |
What most consumers want in this country (at least as far as produce) is pretty food. This is a problem, but I'm not sure how big. However, when consumers get more educated, they will know how to select food beyond whether or not "it looks good." So, most farmers grow varieties that can be picked a little early, and will last several days going from the farm to the market. Taste is secondary. This is another problem that is slowly getting solved. I make it a point to try and buy from local vendors and locally produced food. I have the luxury of living in the bay area with infinite great produce from local producers, so I have no excuse NOT to. I'm cutting down on global warming by reducing the need to ship food from elsewhere, and the local food is fresher. While I still shop there one beef I have with Trader Joe's is their excessive shipping. For example, there's a Trader Joe's in Emeryville (a tiny city right between Oakland/Berkeley). They sell their "store brand" bread which is really bread manufactured by Acme Bakery, which happens to also be in Emeryville. So the bread only travels a couple blocks, right? Nope. It gets shipped to TJ's closest headquarters (I think in LA - somewhere ridiculously far) to get packaged in the Trader Joe's signature packaging, then shipped back to Emeryville for sale. How ecological is that? - Matt ____________ -- BOINC/SETI@home network/web/science/development person -- "Any idiot can have a good idea. What is hard is to do it." - Jeanne-Claude | |
| ID: 531750 · | |
I don't know. If it's one truck from Emeryville to the distribution center, and one truck back that is full of all of the stuff that your local TJ's sells, it may not be as inefficient as it sounds. The longer distances __may__ be offset by only running full trucks -- especially if bread is 2% or less of what is on the truck (I don't imagine any one store can absorb a truckload of bread). I also don't know if anyone at TJ's has tried to figure that out, but I'd imagine that they have people to do that. Minimizing fuel costs would tend to minimize emissions.... I do know that here, south of L.A. a lot of their bread comes from a bakery between L.A. and San Diego. ____________ | |
| ID: 531758 · | |
I don't know. If it's one truck from Emeryville to the distribution center, and one truck back that is full of all of the stuff that your local TJ's sells, it may not be as inefficient as it sounds. The longer distances __may__ be offset by only running full trucks -- especially if bread is 2% or less of what is on the truck (I don't imagine any one store can absorb a truckload of bread). The problem there is that fuel and roads are far too cheap. Other aspects of the operation cost far more and those higher costs get optimised out first. That usually means that more fuel gets burnt to take advantage of "convenience factor"... Regards, Martin ____________ Mandriva Linux A user friendly OS! See new freedom Mageia2 The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3) | |
| ID: 531760 · | |
One factor to remember (which is mentioned in the webcast) is that Americans pay *far* less for food on average than the rest of the world. If everyone coughed up the "extra" change to buy organic/local/ethical food they'd still be paying less than most of their international counterparts. One problem, I think, is that American food advertising is focused on quantity and not quality. This is actually kinda gross when you think about it. I'd rather get a good deal on a mattress, or a box of nails, but why are people so willing to save 20 cents to put completely processed unhealthy junk inside their bodies? One example would be in Europe, specifically in the EU countries that now use the euro as currency. I can remember the prices for food in Germany when the mark was still used. When the euro arrived things changed, and the prices for food became noticeably higher, especially in the town markets where many people do their shopping for fresh produce. Well, if we're to believe the people that tell us foods containing unatural additives and pesticides are bad for human health in the long-term, and even shorten lifespan, than paying an extra 20 cents is worth it. ____________ | |
| ID: 531965 · | |
Okay.. lest I keep hijacking other staff members' threads I better start my own for once. Watch it if you eat. Yes it's long but very informative. Thank you for the post, Matt. Try to eat where you can and... ..."Keep reaching for those stars!". ____________ DONATE TO SETI | |
| ID: 535279 · | |
Message boards : SETI@home Staff Blog : Way off topic #1 - Recommended Viewing
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |