Do we already have enough computing power for SETI@home?

Message boards : Number crunching : Do we already have enough computing power for SETI@home?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
HTH
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 8 Jul 00
Posts: 691
Credit: 909,237
RAC: 0
Finland
Message 497768 - Posted: 5 Jan 2007, 8:24:46 UTC

Do we already have enough computing power for SETI@home?

The band we are looking at is only 2.5 MHz wide. The SKA will use a band about 35 GHz wide. How much more computing power would a band this wide need, if we are going to use SETI@home-like search? Should we also search for TV-transmissions?

Manned mission to Mars in 2019 Petition <-- Sign this, please.
ID: 497768 · Report as offensive
Profile Jakob Creutzfeld
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 Oct 00
Posts: 611
Credit: 2,025,000
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 497770 - Posted: 5 Jan 2007, 8:47:04 UTC - in response to Message 497768.  

Should we also search for TV-transmissions?


Oh nooo, please don't! The earth television is bad enough... So I think we don't really need additional extraterrestrial series like "Love Boat", "Dallas" or even Call-in-shows... LOL

Andy
ID: 497770 · Report as offensive
HTH
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 8 Jul 00
Posts: 691
Credit: 909,237
RAC: 0
Finland
Message 497773 - Posted: 5 Jan 2007, 8:51:18 UTC - in response to Message 497770.  

Oh nooo, please don't! The earth television is bad enough... So I think we don't really need additional extraterrestrial series like "Love Boat", "Dallas" or even Call-in-shows... LOL


At least, I would like to watch "I love ET-Lucy"!

Manned mission to Mars in 2019 Petition <-- Sign this, please.
ID: 497773 · Report as offensive
Dark Angel
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Aug 01
Posts: 432
Credit: 2,673,754
RAC: 0
United States
Message 497808 - Posted: 5 Jan 2007, 10:37:21 UTC - in response to Message 497770.  

Should we also search for TV-transmissions?


Oh nooo, please don't! The earth television is bad enough... So I think we don't really need additional extraterrestrial series like "Love Boat", "Dallas" or even Call-in-shows... LOL

Andy


Then again we may see ourselves one day on Intergalactic Geographic...but watch out for those extraterrestrial infomercials.

ID: 497808 · Report as offensive
Profile Jakob Creutzfeld
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 Oct 00
Posts: 611
Credit: 2,025,000
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 497812 - Posted: 5 Jan 2007, 10:47:50 UTC - in response to Message 497808.  

Then again we may see ourselves one day on Intergalactic Geographic...


LOL... Yeah. My TV guide says, it will be broadcasted on "Wega-CNN III" next week... :-)
ID: 497812 · Report as offensive
Profile mikey
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Dec 99
Posts: 4215
Credit: 3,474,603
RAC: 0
United States
Message 497819 - Posted: 5 Jan 2007, 11:18:52 UTC - in response to Message 497768.  

Do we already have enough computing power for SETI@home?

The band we are looking at is only 2.5 MHz wide. The SKA will use a band about 35 GHz wide. How much more computing power would a band this wide need, if we are going to use SETI@home-like search? Should we also search for TV-transmissions?

We have enough computing power for Seti as it is today. We are not running out of units TODAY because alot of us run multiple projects. BUT when the new units come that are in Beta right now, no we will not. There are so many possible units that have never been checked, and can be made, with the new systems and the even newer ones to come, that Seti could use lots more computing power for a while to come yet.
hint...click on a users name in the left hand column and see all the projects they are signed up for.
ID: 497819 · Report as offensive
Calculator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 30 Sep 06
Posts: 62
Credit: 69,529
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 497837 - Posted: 5 Jan 2007, 11:54:12 UTC

Yeah, I'd like to see some extrterrestrial peepshow :-))
I am signed up to other projects as well, but they dont regularily get work as I clicked on no more work...

ID: 497837 · Report as offensive
lynxtra
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Sep 04
Posts: 137
Credit: 273,636
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 497843 - Posted: 5 Jan 2007, 12:13:02 UTC

or ET finally arrives at home directed by Steven "i love aliens" Speilberg
the truth is out there
ID: 497843 · Report as offensive
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 65738
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 497887 - Posted: 5 Jan 2007, 13:32:53 UTC
Last modified: 5 Jan 2007, 13:34:35 UTC

Just what We need an ET-Battlestar Galactica, With My luck the Cylons would be the Good Guys. :(

Oh and as I write this I'm building another QX6700 quad core PC, With another one due in a few weeks possibly. :D So Reinforcements are on their way.
The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's
ID: 497887 · Report as offensive
tito
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 28 Jul 02
Posts: 24
Credit: 19,536,875
RAC: 138
Poland
Message 497929 - Posted: 5 Jan 2007, 15:10:01 UTC

But, there is written, that this radio telescope will be fully operational in 2020. Till then, home CPU's shall be much, much faster. We don't have to worry. Who knows, maybe in 2020, RAC would be 20.000 per CPU?
ID: 497929 · Report as offensive
Profile Clyde C. Phillips, III

Send message
Joined: 2 Aug 00
Posts: 1851
Credit: 5,955,047
RAC: 0
United States
Message 497999 - Posted: 5 Jan 2007, 18:30:49 UTC

It seems to me like seeing "ET Lucy" would be an exaggeration unless the aliens were able to beam those TV signals right at us. One square kilometer is big but it's only about 100 times what we're using at Arecibo. Based on what I've read in these and Classic's forums it would take a lot more than that much improvement to detect/read TV signals from other star systems. If Moores Law holds up, in 13-1/2 years (mid-2020) we would see nine doublings of computer power or an increase of 500x. A reasonable-cost Core 2 Duo today does an RAC of about 2,000. So that would be a million. Moores Law might not hold up, though, because of the approach to atomic size (about 0.3 nanometer) of some computer parts.
ID: 497999 · Report as offensive
Profile Diego -=Mav3rik=-
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Jun 99
Posts: 333
Credit: 3,587,148
RAC: 0
Message 498187 - Posted: 6 Jan 2007, 3:49:33 UTC - in response to Message 497999.  

Alien TV features humans as the bad guys. We invade/kill/eat/abduct them.
/Mav

We have lingered long enough on the shores of the cosmic ocean.
We are ready at last to set sail for the stars.

(Carl Sagan)
ID: 498187 · Report as offensive
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 65738
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 498208 - Posted: 6 Jan 2007, 4:30:41 UTC - in response to Message 498187.  
Last modified: 6 Jan 2007, 4:31:24 UTC

Alien TV features humans as the bad guys. We invade/kill/eat/abduct them.


Yeah, UFO the TV series from the 1960's, To the Aliens in It We were the bad guys keeping them on a dying planet.



It's too bad that some of the leading actors in the series can't reprise their old roles anymore(Ed Bishop=Commander Straker/2nd down from the top).

http://www.ufoseries.com/
The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's
ID: 498208 · Report as offensive
Profile Keck_Komputers
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 1575
Credit: 4,152,111
RAC: 1
United States
Message 498333 - Posted: 6 Jan 2007, 11:27:05 UTC - in response to Message 498208.  

Alien TV features humans as the bad guys. We invade/kill/eat/abduct them.


Yeah, UFO the TV series from the 1960's, To the Aliens in It We were the bad guys keeping them on a dying planet.



It's too bad that some of the leading actors in the series can't reprise their old roles anymore(Ed Bishop=Commander Straker/2nd down from the top).

http://www.ufoseries.com/

I vaguely remember the series. I definately had a UFO lunch box in grade school.
BOINC WIKI

BOINCing since 2002/12/8
ID: 498333 · Report as offensive
HTH
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 8 Jul 00
Posts: 691
Credit: 909,237
RAC: 0
Finland
Message 498751 - Posted: 6 Jan 2007, 19:39:24 UTC - in response to Message 497929.  
Last modified: 6 Jan 2007, 19:41:19 UTC

But, there is written, that this radio telescope will be fully operational in 2020. Till then, home CPU's shall be much, much faster. We don't have to worry. Who knows, maybe in 2020, RAC would be 20.000 per CPU?


True, but Allen Telescope Array is already partially complete. It will also have a large bandwidth. I do not know, whether it is possible to distribute ATA-data via Internet to crunch it at home...

Maybe we will need those 80-core processors Intel is planning to introduce in the next few years...

Manned mission to Mars in 2019 Petition <-- Sign this, please.
ID: 498751 · Report as offensive
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 65738
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 498752 - Posted: 6 Jan 2007, 19:41:56 UTC - in response to Message 498751.  

But, there is written, that this radio telescope will be fully operational in 2020. Till then, home CPU's shall be much, much faster. We don't have to worry. Who knows, maybe in 2020, RAC would be 20.000 per CPU?


True, but Allen Telescope Array is already partially complete. It will also have a large bandwidth. I do not, whether it is possible to distribute ATA-data via Internet to crunch it at home...

Maybe we will need those 80-core processors Intel is planning to introduce in the next few years...

Those 80 cpus aren't x86 compatible, So I'd doubt You'll see them without being made into a bunch of co-processors somehow.
The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's
ID: 498752 · Report as offensive
HTH
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 8 Jul 00
Posts: 691
Credit: 909,237
RAC: 0
Finland
Message 499084 - Posted: 7 Jan 2007, 15:10:05 UTC - in response to Message 498752.  

Those 80 cpus aren't x86 compatible, So I'd doubt You'll see them without being made into a bunch of co-processors somehow.


What? No x86-support?-(

Manned mission to Mars in 2019 Petition <-- Sign this, please.
ID: 499084 · Report as offensive
Profile mikey
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Dec 99
Posts: 4215
Credit: 3,474,603
RAC: 0
United States
Message 499091 - Posted: 7 Jan 2007, 15:33:56 UTC - in response to Message 499084.  

Those 80 cpus aren't x86 compatible, So I'd doubt You'll see them without being made into a bunch of co-processors somehow.


What? No x86-support?-(

Details of the new 'chip' are here, even a picture of it.
http://news.com.com/Intel+pledges+80+cores+in+five+years/2100-1006_3-6119618.html
ID: 499091 · Report as offensive
Profile ChrisJay

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 02
Posts: 35
Credit: 843,487
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 499612 - Posted: 8 Jan 2007, 20:56:27 UTC

Hmmm, I don't know about you guys, but am thinking it might be slightly expensive! I've got 5 quid if you fancy chipping in, lol
Would love to see how they cool a system like that, hard enough with dual core here
ID: 499612 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : Do we already have enough computing power for SETI@home?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.