Corruption of the User Signature field

Questions and Answers : Getting started : Corruption of the User Signature field
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Stephen Balch
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Apr 00
Posts: 141
Credit: 13,912
RAC: 0
United States
Message 21895 - Posted: 3 Sep 2004, 16:55:08 UTC
Last modified: 3 Sep 2004, 16:58:42 UTC

The "Edit account information" page ( http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/edit_user_info_form.php ) seems to have some sort of "overflow" problem with the signature field when the users signature text becomes too long (greater than 254 characters).

The contents of my signature box in the form is:

<PRE>
"(P)Not only are we doing distributed processing, now we're doing distributed debugging.<BR>Who'd a' thunk it? (GRIN)(/P)(a)(img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/seti2/stats.php?userID=1011") (a)(img src="http://seti.mundayweb.com/stats.php?userID=265(/textarea)(/b)(/td)(/tr)
(tr)(td class=fieldname bgcolor=eeeeee align=right valign=top)(br)(/td)(td valign=top)(b)(input type=submit value='Update info')(/b)(/td)(/tr)
(/table)
(/form)
(br)(hr noshade size=1)(center)(a href=http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah/)Return to SETI@home main page(/a)(br)
(br)(br)(Copyright © 2004 University of California(/center)
(/body)
(/html)"
</PRE>

and there is no "Submit" button, so I have no way the updateclearcorrect the signature text.

In the code above, I have replaced the "less than" and "greater then" symbols with the "open parenthesis" and "close parenthesis," respectively. (My signature, below, is hard coded into this message.)

<P>Stephen<BR>S@h Berkeley's Staff Friends Club © Member<BR>
Not only are we doing "distributed processing," now we're doing "distributed debugging."<BR>Who'd a' thunk it? (GRIN)</P>
<a> [/url]


ID: 21895 · Report as offensive
Heffed
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Mar 02
Posts: 1856
Credit: 40,736
RAC: 0
United States
Message 21956 - Posted: 3 Sep 2004, 19:19:02 UTC

This is a browser specific issue. While I don't use it, other users have reported that if you encounter this issue, you can correct it by using Internet Exploder. (no, not a typo... ;) )

ID: 21956 · Report as offensive
Profile Stephen Balch
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Apr 00
Posts: 141
Credit: 13,912
RAC: 0
United States
Message 22036 - Posted: 3 Sep 2004, 22:12:03 UTC - in response to Message 21956.  

I know it's not a typo, I've called it Internet Exploder for years. However, I'm using Netscape 7.2. I have Internet Exploder on my system because MicroShaft requires me to have it on the machine. They have (or had) tied it into the OS (Win98SE) and the updates for the OS so closely that you have have to have it and all it's security FUBARS.

Thanks for the reply,

Stephen
ID: 22036 · Report as offensive
Heffed
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Mar 02
Posts: 1856
Credit: 40,736
RAC: 0
United States
Message 22178 - Posted: 4 Sep 2004, 4:13:50 UTC - in response to Message 22036.  

> I know it's not a typo, I've called it Internet Exploder for years. However,
> I'm using Netscape 7.2. I have Internet Exploder on my system because
> MicroShaft requires me to have it on the machine. They have (or had) tied it
> into the OS (Win98SE) and the updates for the OS so closely that you have have
> to have it and all it's security FUBARS.

You misunderstood my post.

It's an incompatibility with the site code and NS/Mozilla. :(

Log in with Exploder and you can fix the sig issue.

ID: 22178 · Report as offensive
Profile Stephen Balch
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Apr 00
Posts: 141
Credit: 13,912
RAC: 0
United States
Message 22282 - Posted: 4 Sep 2004, 16:03:32 UTC - in response to Message 22178.  

>
> You misunderstood my post.
>
> It's an incompatibility with the site code and NS/Mozilla. :(
>
> Log in with Exploder and you can fix the sig issue.
>
Yes, Heffed, I did misread your post, and I appologize to you. I will give IE a try, as much as I hate to ever run that thing.

Thanks again,

Stephen
ID: 22282 · Report as offensive
Profile Stephen Balch
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Apr 00
Posts: 141
Credit: 13,912
RAC: 0
United States
Message 22292 - Posted: 4 Sep 2004, 16:16:46 UTC - in response to Message 22282.  
Last modified: 4 Sep 2004, 16:23:53 UTC

Just testing...
ID: 22292 · Report as offensive
Profile Stephen Balch
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Apr 00
Posts: 141
Credit: 13,912
RAC: 0
United States
Message 22293 - Posted: 4 Sep 2004, 16:24:22 UTC - in response to Message 22292.  

Just testing...


<P>Not only are we doing distributed processing, now we're doing distributed debugging.<BR>Who'd a' thunk it? (GRIN)<BR><a>
ID: 22293 · Report as offensive
Profile Stephen Balch
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Apr 00
Posts: 141
Credit: 13,912
RAC: 0
United States
Message 22294 - Posted: 4 Sep 2004, 16:26:29 UTC - in response to Message 22293.  

> Just testing...
>

Heffed, that got it. Thank you very much for your assistance.

Stephen

<P>Not only are we doing distributed processing, now we're doing distributed debugging.<BR>Who'd a' thunk it? (GRIN)<BR><a>
ID: 22294 · Report as offensive
Heffed
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Mar 02
Posts: 1856
Credit: 40,736
RAC: 0
United States
Message 22305 - Posted: 4 Sep 2004, 17:23:52 UTC - in response to Message 22294.  

> Heffed, that got it. Thank you very much for your assistance.

No problem. I can't take credit though, I was just passing on what I had read on the forum. :)

I think it's something the S@H team needs to look at though, because more and more people are becoming wary of Exploder. I'm amazed anyone still uses it...

ID: 22305 · Report as offensive

Questions and Answers : Getting started : Corruption of the User Signature field


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.