Is boinc slower than S@H classic

Questions and Answers : Preferences : Is boinc slower than S@H classic

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile UBT - PaulT
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 17 Dec 00
Posts: 25
Credit: 173,834
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 21503 - Posted: 2 Sep 2004, 17:29:40 UTC

It used to take my pc just over 2 hours to complete a work unit on seti@home classic but i'm looking at over 4 hours using boinc. Is this normal?

ID: 21503 · Report as offensive
Profile Keck_Komputers
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 1575
Credit: 2,456,106
RAC: 1,602
United States
Message 21601 - Posted: 2 Sep 2004, 22:36:10 UTC

It is unusual. The BOINC version normally runs a little faster than the classic. It may just be the initial estimate is off, the seti process needs to get to 70% to 90% before an accurate total is displayed.

John Keck -- BOINCing since 2002/12/08 --

ID: 21601 · Report as offensive
Profile Ed and Harriet Griffith
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 10 Apr 99
Posts: 127
Credit: 12,219
RAC: 34
United States
Message 24377 - Posted: 10 Sep 2004, 4:26:10 UTC - in response to Message 21601.

> It is unusual. The BOINC version normally runs a little faster than the
> classic. It may just be the initial estimate is off, the seti process needs to
> get to 70% to 90% before an accurate total is displayed.
>
John Keck -- BOINCing since 2002/12/08 -- <a> href="http://www.boinc.dk/index.php?page=user_statistics&project=sah&userid=138092">
> I have found this to be true. I went from 40 hours seti classic to 9.5 hours with BOINC (1.8Ghz, 224 megs ram)

ID: 24377 · Report as offensive
Pascal, K G
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 2343
Credit: 150,491
RAC: 0
United States
Message 24393 - Posted: 10 Sep 2004, 4:56:51 UTC

Turn the screen saver off and it will go faster.......
When Asking for help, please post the following;
Type of PC
How much memory
Type of Operating System
Type of connection to Internet
Projects You are Running
Version of BOINC

M7 Seti@h Berkeley's Staff Friends Club ©

ID: 24393 · Report as offensive
Profile Thierry Van Driessche
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 02
Posts: 3083
Credit: 150,010
RAC: 132
Belgium
Message 24440 - Posted: 10 Sep 2004, 8:40:44 UTC

S@H Classic 3:55 hours normally, S@H2 between 4:10 and 4:25 hours.
Using same PC with same configuration.
P4 running at 2.88GHZ, using HT.

Greetings from Belgium.

Help Desk: use "Most recent answer first" sorting.

ID: 24440 · Report as offensive
Mikie Tim T

Send message
Joined: 23 Dec 00
Posts: 27
Credit: 10,536
RAC: 0
United States
Message 27063 - Posted: 16 Sep 2004, 16:07:59 UTC

There is also a known issue with the GUI taking some CPU cycles even when minimized if left on either the "Work" or "Disk" tabs. Those tabs are updated by the BOINC process every second, so if either are left as the active tab when minimized, they will still cause the client to consume some CPU. Of course, if you are running the CLI version, this isn't your issue.

ID: 27063 · Report as offensive

Questions and Answers : Preferences : Is boinc slower than S@H classic


 
©2016 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.