What is wrong with a more PG Cafe?

Message boards : Politics : What is wrong with a more PG Cafe?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 . . . 9 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile BODLEY
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Oct 06
Posts: 725
Credit: 130,841
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 469172 - Posted: 30 Nov 2006, 21:50:46 UTC

I do not know what to say ...
NO youngster comes here for a quick fix.
When he can MORE than equally go to Google
and enter prettyboring and then click on britney spears ...

If none of you guys have ever found out what is available
on the Internet, you have NO right to pontificate as to what is
allowed to youngsters who are FAR more computer literate than
any of their parents are.

What happens here is NOTHING compared to what curious adolescents
cannot find elsewhere ... and have been doing so in different media
for generations ...

Oh! Please grow up ...
ID: 469172 · Report as offensive
Profile iX
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Aug 06
Posts: 684
Credit: 6,175
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 469188 - Posted: 30 Nov 2006, 22:17:25 UTC - in response to Message 469172.  

I do not know what to say ...
NO youngster comes here for a quick fix.
When he can MORE than equally go to Google
and enter prettyboring and then click on britney spears ...

If none of you guys have ever found out what is available
on the Internet, you have NO right to pontificate as to what is
allowed to youngsters who are FAR more computer literate than
any of their parents are.

What happens here is NOTHING compared to what curious adolescents
cannot find elsewhere ... and have been doing so in different media
for generations ...

Oh! Please grow up ...

What goes on 'out there' is one thing, but what is wanted 'here' in this board is another. It's not about agreeing a definition of what can be seen where, it's about what is, and is not, wanted 'here' - by those that set the agenda here, in this place, defined as the SETI@Home Cafe.

Account frozen...
ID: 469188 · Report as offensive
Profile BODLEY
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Oct 06
Posts: 725
Credit: 130,841
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 469192 - Posted: 30 Nov 2006, 22:25:22 UTC - in response to Message 469188.  

What goes on 'out there' is one thing, but what is wanted 'here' in this board is another. It's not about agreeing a definition of what can be seen where, it's about what is, and is not, wanted 'here' - by those that set the agenda here, in this place, defined as the SETI@Home Cafe.

I agree totally.
That is why I made the remark above.
I don't want to see prurient stuff here ... but that is NOT the nub of the argument.
There already is NOTHING here to excite or deviate young minds ...
It is just that some people take matters to the n-th degree ... and try drip-by-drip to
further erode the freedoms of expression that have been won over many decades in
furtherance of the greatest scourge of modern times ... Political Correctness.
ID: 469192 · Report as offensive
Profile iX
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Aug 06
Posts: 684
Credit: 6,175
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 469195 - Posted: 30 Nov 2006, 22:27:28 UTC - in response to Message 469192.  

What goes on 'out there' is one thing, but what is wanted 'here' in this board is another. It's not about agreeing a definition of what can be seen where, it's about what is, and is not, wanted 'here' - by those that set the agenda here, in this place, defined as the SETI@Home Cafe.

I agree totally.
That is why I made the remark above.
I don't want to see prurient stuff here ... but that is NOT the nub of the argument.
There already is NOTHING here to excite or deviate young minds ...
It is just that some people take matters to the n-th degree ... and try drip-by-drip to
further erode the freedoms of expression that have been won over many decades in
furtherance of the greatest scourge of modern times ... Political Correctness.

And I agree with you there Bodley. I think the fractured nature of moderation with different ideas of what they saw as children is becoming a pain to all.

Account frozen...
ID: 469195 · Report as offensive
Profile Es99
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Aug 05
Posts: 10874
Credit: 350,402
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 469196 - Posted: 30 Nov 2006, 22:27:49 UTC - in response to Message 469167.  


[b]EDIT: Count me as the monkey.


So you are saying that you find pictures of women in bathing suits offensive, but find breastfeeding in public to be perfectly acceptable?!?!?!?!


...and they say I'm the crazy one :)

Why would we need pictures of women in bathing suits posted all over a science forum? I mean..I can understand the necessity of feeding a baby...but pictures of women in bathing suits doesn't strike me as something that we need here in the cafe...especially as it's rather degrading to women.
Reality Internet Personality
ID: 469196 · Report as offensive
Profile BODLEY
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Oct 06
Posts: 725
Credit: 130,841
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 469197 - Posted: 30 Nov 2006, 22:29:31 UTC
Last modified: 30 Nov 2006, 22:30:39 UTC

Whilst I am occupying my soap-box, I might opine that I personally find
it disturbing that a member here should use the image of a child as his avater.
There is something disturbing about this.
This is my personal view ... though I do not expect to be trampled underfoot by supporters.
Think about it, people!
[edit] spelling
ID: 469197 · Report as offensive
Profile iX
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Aug 06
Posts: 684
Credit: 6,175
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 469200 - Posted: 30 Nov 2006, 22:30:43 UTC - in response to Message 469195.  

And I agree with you there Bodley. I think the fractured nature of moderation with different ideas of what they saw as children is becoming a pain to all.

It's why having a cordinator like knightmare might help - to provide some consistency and cohesion in the moderation team.

Account frozen...
ID: 469200 · Report as offensive
Profile Captain Avatar
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 May 99
Posts: 15133
Credit: 529,088
RAC: 0
United States
Message 469201 - Posted: 30 Nov 2006, 22:31:38 UTC - in response to Message 469200.  

And I agree with you there Bodley. I think the fractured nature of moderation with different ideas of what they saw as children is becoming a pain to all.

It's why having a cordinator like knightmare might help - to provide some consistency and cohesion in the moderation team.

Maybe he already fills that role?
ID: 469201 · Report as offensive
Profile Captain Avatar
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 May 99
Posts: 15133
Credit: 529,088
RAC: 0
United States
Message 469203 - Posted: 30 Nov 2006, 22:33:02 UTC - in response to Message 469197.  

Whilst I am occupying my soap-box, I might opine that I personally find
it disturbing that a member here should use the image of a child as his avater.
There is something disturbing about this.
This is my personal view ... though I do not expect to be trampled underfoot by supporters.
Think about it, people!
[edit] spelling


Shoot Bodley your reaching on that one.....
I like his avatar.....:-)

ID: 469203 · Report as offensive
Profile iX
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Aug 06
Posts: 684
Credit: 6,175
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 469204 - Posted: 30 Nov 2006, 22:34:59 UTC - in response to Message 469203.  

Whilst I am occupying my soap-box, I might opine that I personally find
it disturbing that a member here should use the image of a child as his avater.
There is something disturbing about this.
This is my personal view ... though I do not expect to be trampled underfoot by supporters.
Think about it, people!
[edit] spelling


Shoot Bodley your reaching on that one.....
I like his avatar.....:-)

I personally think sheep wearing hats is totally out of fashion. Surely a cap would suite more?

Account frozen...
ID: 469204 · Report as offensive
Profile iX
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Aug 06
Posts: 684
Credit: 6,175
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 469206 - Posted: 30 Nov 2006, 22:36:12 UTC - in response to Message 469201.  

And I agree with you there Bodley. I think the fractured nature of moderation with different ideas of what they saw as children is becoming a pain to all.

It's why having a cordinator like knightmare might help - to provide some consistency and cohesion in the moderation team.

Maybe he already fills that role?

Well I hope he is. and I hope he is gratified that he has our support.

Account frozen...
ID: 469206 · Report as offensive
Profile Rush
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 3131
Credit: 302,569
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 469219 - Posted: 30 Nov 2006, 22:44:30 UTC - in response to Message 469196.  

Why would we need pictures of women in bathing suits posted all over a science forum? I mean..I can understand the necessity of feeding a baby...but pictures of women in bathing suits doesn't strike me as something that we need here in the cafe...especially as it's rather degrading to women.

Which, of course, amounts to nothing more than your subjective opinion. One that others disagree with.

"Need" isn't up for discussion because we don't "need" 99.99999% of the posts here, by any sense of the word. But they are here because some individuals enjoy them. Which is why sometimes you see a baby massaging a breast and sometimes you see a woman massaging her throat.

Which is also why all social relations should be voluntary., i.e. hanging out here or leaving.
Cordially,
Rush

elrushbo2@theobviousgmail.com
Remove the obvious...
ID: 469219 · Report as offensive
Profile Captain Avatar
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 May 99
Posts: 15133
Credit: 529,088
RAC: 0
United States
Message 469226 - Posted: 30 Nov 2006, 22:48:42 UTC - in response to Message 469204.  

Whilst I am occupying my soap-box, I might opine that I personally find
it disturbing that a member here should use the image of a child as his avater.
There is something disturbing about this.
This is my personal view ... though I do not expect to be trampled underfoot by supporters.
Think about it, people!
[edit] spelling


Shoot Bodley your reaching on that one.....
I like his avatar.....:-)

I personally think sheep wearing hats is totally out of fashion. Surely a cap would suite more?

Thats Mr. Pea Nut Sheep!
ID: 469226 · Report as offensive
Profile Es99
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Aug 05
Posts: 10874
Credit: 350,402
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 469236 - Posted: 30 Nov 2006, 22:57:09 UTC - in response to Message 469219.  

Which, of course, amounts to nothing more than your subjective opinion. One that others disagree with.

"Need" isn't up for discussion because we don't "need" 99.99999% of the posts here, by any sense of the word. But they are here because some individuals enjoy them. Which is why sometimes you see a baby massaging a breast and sometimes you see a woman massaging her throat.

Which is also why all social relations should be voluntary., i.e. hanging out here or leaving.

I said need because Brainsmashr was comparing breast feeding to posting pictures on a message board. Which I don't think are equitable at all.

But you are right..none of the posts here are needed, so why hang on to ones that are derogatory and objectify women?
Reality Internet Personality
ID: 469236 · Report as offensive
Profile Mike Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 01
Posts: 34257
Credit: 79,922,639
RAC: 80
Germany
Message 469267 - Posted: 30 Nov 2006, 23:29:11 UTC

Why do you reply if they are needless.
You ignore most of the other posts.



With each crime and every kindness we birth our future.
ID: 469267 · Report as offensive
Profile Captain Avatar
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 May 99
Posts: 15133
Credit: 529,088
RAC: 0
United States
Message 469302 - Posted: 1 Dec 2006, 0:15:23 UTC

Sammie!
ID: 469302 · Report as offensive
Profile sammie
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Nov 06
Posts: 304
Credit: 443
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 469305 - Posted: 1 Dec 2006, 0:16:42 UTC - in response to Message 469302.  

Sammie!

what? truth hurts?
knightmare for Forum Admin
He sure has my vote.
ID: 469305 · Report as offensive
Profile iX
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Aug 06
Posts: 684
Credit: 6,175
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 469306 - Posted: 1 Dec 2006, 0:17:01 UTC - in response to Message 469302.  

Sammie!

Oh Sammie, and just when I thought we were a winning team :<

Account frozen...
ID: 469306 · Report as offensive
Profile sammie
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Nov 06
Posts: 304
Credit: 443
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 469307 - Posted: 1 Dec 2006, 0:18:30 UTC - in response to Message 469306.  

Sammie!

Oh Sammie, and just when I thought we were a winning team :<

banishment suits me ;p
knightmare for Forum Admin
He sure has my vote.
ID: 469307 · Report as offensive
Profile thorin belvrog
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Sep 06
Posts: 6418
Credit: 8,893
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 469308 - Posted: 1 Dec 2006, 0:18:41 UTC - in response to Message 469305.  

Sammie!

what? truth hurts?

Normally not, only when it ought to...

sorry to have jumped in
Account frozen...
ID: 469308 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 . . . 9 · Next

Message boards : Politics : What is wrong with a more PG Cafe?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.