http://www.alienvideo.net/seti-makes-contact.php

According to Dr. Steven Greer, yes, SETI has received multiple extraterrestrial signals. This news he says, is confirmed by senior employees within the SETI program.

:)

Greetings from Germany NRW
Ulli

WOW i hope its tru.only time will tell.
Thanks for the info.

---

Scorpions - Wind Of Change

I would be more likely to believe a PhD who doesn't spell "definitely" as "defiantly". Ok, I can't spell either but I'm not a PhD & not making claims about what the SETI project knows about aliens. Precision is everything.

---

Tonight's Coast to Coast AM broadcast will feature Ian Punnett interviewing Seth Shostak. Amongst other topics to be discussed will be the reports of a "hot signal" being found by SETI.

This is certainly not the first time that someone circulates the message that a hot signal has been found without providing the hard facts that everyone can see and check. Of course we all in the SETI community hope that one day a definitive signal is detected; but this is not the same as someone hearing that a "hot" signal has been detected, overestimating or exaggerating the facts. SETI has found millions or much more candidate signals, some "warm" and some "hot". I would like to see more facts and a serious confirmation of the signal by SETI standard procedures before I would like to pay a lot of attention to this "news". I remember hearing this "news" every now and then, often in summer time when news are scarce and stories about Loch Ness etc. get more attention than usual.

If anyone have the text of the interview with Seth Shostak, is it possible to post it here (or in any public place)?

---

> Dr. Seth Shostak - Senior Astronomer @

650-961-6633
seth@seti.org

"Bottom line? We can now list eight worlds (including Earth) in a nine-planet solar system that are possible places for life"

< Publications . . .
http://www.seti.org/site/apps/nl/content.asp?c=ktJ2J9MMIsE&b=180480&ct=207304
http://www.seti.org/site/pp.asp?c=ktJ2J9MMIsE&b=277807
http://www.seti.org/site/pp.asp?c=ktJ2J9MMIsE&b=277171


< interviews with Seth Shostak
http://www.annonline.com/interviews/960814/

Copyright © 2006, SETI Institute

This is certainly not the first time that someone circulates the message that a hot signal has been found without providing the hard facts that everyone can see and check. Of course we all in the SETI community hope that one day a definitive signal is detected; but this is not the same as someone hearing that a "hot" signal has been detected, overestimating or exaggerating the facts. SETI has found millions or much more candidate signals, some "warm" and some "hot". I would like to see more facts and a serious confirmation of the signal by SETI standard procedures before I would like to pay a lot of attention to this "news". I remember hearing this "news" every now and then, often in summer time when news are scarce and stories about Loch Ness etc. get more attention than usual.

If anyone have the text of the interview with Seth Shostak, is it possible to post it here (or in any public place)?

Check out Ann Online you will hear the facts of the broadcast of 10 YEARS ago. What I am wondering is if SETI is not letting us know the facts. Is it possible not one but MANY REAL 'HOT' signals have been found and they don't want the 'public' to panic? If we were going to 'panic' we wouldn't be doing this in the first place. Also, the 'Public' is far more educated these days, in many, many cases far more than those who 'worry' the Public will panic if someone says anything about a real signal or signals. Anyway, how will we ever know (KNOW!)if anything IS ever heard?? I'm running my computer constantly just to be sure the SETI program can continue to run, but if anything like signals are being hidden, why should I? Electricity along with everything else is rising rapidly, not to speak of internet DSL costs. I want to know if there is any chance of a signal or signals ever being reported to us, Us being those running hour after hour of programs. Thanks for reading.

---

I would trust Mr Shostak & Ms Tartar without any element of doubt.
If they say there has been no valid signal to date,
that's good enough for me,
and this only encourages me to compute even more workunits.
My PC could be one of the computers that comes up with the result.
The odds are big, but someone has to find it.

---

*** Those who know, don't speak,
those who speak, don't know ***

OT [sort of :-)]
eh Gerard, how've ya been my friend?
Happy 4th (USA)
Hope All is Well w/ u & family Sir!!!

. . . This Thread returns to it's original purposer :)

Hi Richard doing well here,
apart from my Bull that is,(Tyson 1st)
who expired under mysterious circumstances last week,
wasn't insured either, :(
and no it wasn't alien abduction,
something to do with a magnesium deficiency.
Tyson 11 is now on the ground,
doing his bit for king and country,
and seems to be quite pleased with himself,
as are the recipients of his attentions.
A happy 4th to you, sir!

Thread:
The site here is at the home of SETI,
and as such is devoid of conspirators at it's head.
If there's a signal,
we'll hear about it.
As will the world,
which may result in more much needed funding.
There is nothing to be gained by keeping a legitimate discovery quiet.

---

*** Those who know, don't speak,
those who speak, don't know ***

Come on guys, We already know They are visiting...:) I would be more interested to hear the scientific community giving a rational explanation for such convincing video evidence of Their presence.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9080369676973948865

...:)

Greetings from Bulgaria and watch out for the Aliens, contact will be made soon ...:)

http://youtube.com/watch?v=NjxvAjgJQUw&search=bulgarian%20ufo

---

I'm not even remotely convinced by either of the 2 videos, the 2nd one is, IMHO, a perfect example of the genre of fakes that are all too prevalent.
The first shows nothing other than orbital debris, pulsing lights are nothing other than rotating ice reflecting ambient light.
Nothing here to tie any of these to Exterrestrials.
Speculations like these does nothing other than lower the tone of the Project and attract the attentions of impressionable wackos who believe this stuff.
I believe intelligent Extraterrestrials exist,
but they could be 100's if not 1000's of lightyears away from us.
That's a very long distance
and if they were going to visit or observe,
their agenda would be a bit more rational
than that depicted by the so called witnesses.

---

*** Those who know, don't speak,
those who speak, don't know ***

Come on guys, We already know They are visiting...:)

Considering that the entire existence of the "flying saucer" phonomenon is based on a misinterpretation of Kenneth Arnold's (the pilot who reported seeing objects skipping like saucers over water - he meant that they were skipping like saucers would, not that they looked like saucers skipping) quote.

Number of reports of "flying saucers" before the misinterpretation: 0

Number of reports of "flying saucers" after: Well, you get my point.


WE created flying saucers - in our minds. There is no doubt that even governments have been involved in looking for them, but they aren't hiding anything, and flying saucers are not real.

---

@Gerard
Still feeling quite pessimistic about it ..:) Ok, you prefer the “orbital debris” argument. Then obviously the so called “debris” must be obeying some unknown to humanity physical laws and instead of keeping an orbit they seem to be floating around as if Earth’s gravity is actually not present. To describe those things as debris is Imho not serious, either.

---

These images belong here: Myths Legends Conspiracy Theories. What IF......?

There are no useful frames of reference in the images anyhow. They should be thrown out on that basis alone because a resonable uneduacted analysis cannot be made without a frame of reference.

---

TEAM
LL

Hi Sleestak,

These images have been released with the official NASA STS-75 mission report. They have been taken in the process of observation of the TSS-1R satelite, and it is evident that the same camera has also recorded the video footage mentioned above. I don't see any good reason for throwing both out as irrelavant, only because, the video has not been officially released at NASA's website. Images are there, video is not. Well, isn't that controversial enough to imply that the scientific community is just not able to give a reasonable explanation for the unnatural behaviour of those clearly visible objects ...:)

---

Hi Sleestak,

These images have been released with the official NASA STS-75 mission report. They have been taken in the process of observation of the TSS-1R satelite, and it is evident that the same camera has also recorded the video footage mentioned above. I don't see any good reason for throwing both out as irrelavant, only because, the video has not been officially released at NASA's website. Images are there, video is not. Well, isn't that controversial enough to imply that the scientific community is just not able to give a reasonable explanation for the unnatural behaviour of those clearly visible objects ...:)

Doc,

When i saw the first pictures of this phenomena, (some months ago) the quality of the video was quite poor and over exposed. However a higher quality release of the footage is available at

Evidence: The case for NASA UFO's Part 1

Evidence: The case for NASA UFO's Part 2

these videos show lower exposure and contrast allowing you to clearly distinguish foreground and background objects (the tether footage). Unfortunately the guy speaking on this video has some fairly bizarre ideas....

Regardless it is interesting how NASA has dodged the questions regarding this phenomena (which is also mentioned in the above links).

There is evidence (from the video) of objects entering and leaving the Earths atmosphere and changing trajectory what the hell is this stuff?!!

How about the objects that spontaneously appear?!!

They seem to be flying and unidentified.

i think you are spot on with NASA's explanation (or lack thereof).

---

Belief gets in the way of learning

When i saw the first pictures of this phenomena, (some months ago) the quality of the video was quite poor and over exposed. However a higher quality release of the footage is available at

Evidence: The case for NASA UFO's Part 1

Evidence: The case for NASA UFO's Part 2

these videos show lower exposure and contrast allowing you to clearly distinguish foreground and background objects (the tether footage). Unfortunately the guy speaking on this video has some fairly bizarre ideas....

Just thought of adding the ed2k links to those videos:

Evidence.The.Case.For.NASA.UFOs.-.Part.1
Evidence.The.Case.For.NASA.UFOs.-.Part.2

Laters.

Edit: Ok, stupid url tag forces "http://". These are the links.
ed2k://|file|Evidence.The.Case.For.NASA.UFOs.-.Part.1.%E2%80%93.VHSRip.avi|731561984|8A6D156B7AF11890A212CF5CD9183B6B|/
ed2k://|file|Evidence.The.Case.For.NASA.UFOs.-.Part.2.%E2%80%93.VHSRip.avi|735055872|11C3FFE04C539120608687A45F9864A4|/

---

/Mav

We have lingered long enough on the shores of the cosmic ocean.
We are ready at last to set sail for the stars.
(Carl Sagan)

How about the objects that spontaneously appear?!!

They seem to be flying and unidentified.

i think you are spot on with NASA's explanation (or lack thereof).

I saw satellites with a moving camera. I saw ice crystals. The 2 satellites were tethered and they had a high current running through it. Combined with the solar radiation, don't you expect to see highly charged particles.?

1)Mir between 210-310 km in altitude and
2)satellites upto 800 km and some even at 4200 km.
3)There was a goal of 924 LEO satellites for telecommunications alone for 2001. An estimated 100 for military use. Point is there are a lot of satelites put there by us.

My conclusion is that you will see a satellite pass by while looking at MIR from any angle. And I'd be surprised if you saw only 1 at a time.

---

TEAM
LL

Hi!

Does anyone have or know the name of more videos like that? I would like to see if someone else made a different conclusions.

p.s.: satellites dont make such a nice light and surtenly dont move so fast as some objects here, I think you can see some of the satellites on the recording and clearly they are different then other lights... the only reason you can see reflection from a satellites is because the sun reflects of the shell and most of the solar array (i think its the right word) but then again that source of light is not permanent/constant because satellites are spining all the time...

And mir was on 350km+ (mid earth orbit) most of the time, they only changed orbit when there was a spaceshuttle on the way, because space shuttle cant reach that hight (low earth orbit, as far as i know...)

---

SpaceInvader!