Whats up with this?

Message boards : Number crunching : Whats up with this?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
chrisjohnston
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 31 Aug 99
Posts: 385
Credit: 91,410
RAC: 0
United States
Message 328128 - Posted: 6 Jun 2006, 0:35:22 UTC

ID: 328128 · Report as offensive
Profile MJKelleher
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Jul 99
Posts: 2048
Credit: 1,575,401
RAC: 0
United States
Message 328133 - Posted: 6 Jun 2006, 0:39:44 UTC

Result #334980396 --

<core_client_version>4.45</core_client_version>

It's using an older version of BOINC, which doesn't calculate the fpops used by Enhanced to calculat credit. The other result is on a machine with a version 5+ client. Ideally, the claim of 237 will be dropped as the high in the quorum.

No issues here, just transitions.

MJ

ID: 328133 · Report as offensive
Hans Dorn
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 2262
Credit: 26,448,570
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 328136 - Posted: 6 Jun 2006, 0:41:13 UTC - in response to Message 328128.  

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=80314706

need I say more?


Someone is using an old BOINC 4.x client and claims the wrong amount of credits.

These old version of BOINC might be disabled in the future.

Regards Hans
ID: 328136 · Report as offensive
chrisjohnston
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 31 Aug 99
Posts: 385
Credit: 91,410
RAC: 0
United States
Message 328138 - Posted: 6 Jun 2006, 0:41:22 UTC - in response to Message 328133.  

Result #334980396 --

<core_client_version>4.45</core_client_version>

It's using an older version of BOINC, which doesn't calculate the fpops used by Enhanced to calculat credit. The other result is on a machine with a version 5+ client. Ideally, the claim of 237 will be dropped as the high in the quorum.

No issues here, just transitions.

MJ


The other 5 is mine. Is 5x not required now? I thought it was? If it isn't shouldn't the guys upstairs make it an issue?
- cJ

ID: 328138 · Report as offensive
chrisjohnston
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 31 Aug 99
Posts: 385
Credit: 91,410
RAC: 0
United States
Message 328139 - Posted: 6 Jun 2006, 0:42:13 UTC

Couldn't this technically be considered, dare I say it... The "c" word?
- cJ

ID: 328139 · Report as offensive
Hans Dorn
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 2262
Credit: 26,448,570
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 328141 - Posted: 6 Jun 2006, 0:42:56 UTC - in response to Message 328138.  

Result #334980396 --

<core_client_version>4.45</core_client_version>

It's using an older version of BOINC, which doesn't calculate the fpops used by Enhanced to calculat credit. The other result is on a machine with a version 5+ client. Ideally, the claim of 237 will be dropped as the high in the quorum.

No issues here, just transitions.

MJ


The other 5 is mine. Is 5x not required now? I thought it was? If it isn't shouldn't the guys upstairs make it an issue?


The 5.x version is still missing for some OS's, so 4.x can't be disabled right now.

Regards Hans
ID: 328141 · Report as offensive
Hans Dorn
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 2262
Credit: 26,448,570
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 328144 - Posted: 6 Jun 2006, 0:43:21 UTC - in response to Message 328139.  

Couldn't this technically be considered, dare I say it... The "c" word?


You mean "Curious", right :-P
ID: 328144 · Report as offensive
chrisjohnston
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 31 Aug 99
Posts: 385
Credit: 91,410
RAC: 0
United States
Message 328145 - Posted: 6 Jun 2006, 0:43:44 UTC - in response to Message 328144.  

Couldn't this technically be considered, dare I say it... The "c" word?


You mean "Curious", right :-P

umm.. ya.. exactally not what I had in mind.
- cJ

ID: 328145 · Report as offensive
web03
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 01
Posts: 355
Credit: 719,156
RAC: 0
United States
Message 328150 - Posted: 6 Jun 2006, 0:49:09 UTC

I have forgotten the answer, but how does a user show up as anonymous? This machine is running Win2k, unless I'm missing something?

Wendy
ID: 328150 · Report as offensive
Hans Dorn
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 2262
Credit: 26,448,570
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 328155 - Posted: 6 Jun 2006, 0:50:46 UTC - in response to Message 328150.  

I have forgotten the answer, but how does a user show up as anonymous? This machine is running Win2k, unless I'm missing something?

Wendy


He/She is hiding his/her computers...

Regards Hans
ID: 328155 · Report as offensive
Alinator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Apr 05
Posts: 4178
Credit: 4,647,982
RAC: 0
United States
Message 328158 - Posted: 6 Jun 2006, 0:51:09 UTC - in response to Message 328150.  

I have forgotten the answer, but how does a user show up as anonymous? This machine is running Win2k, unless I'm missing something?

Wendy


That's how individual WU results are shown when you have your computers hidden.

Alinator
ID: 328158 · Report as offensive
web03
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 01
Posts: 355
Credit: 719,156
RAC: 0
United States
Message 328162 - Posted: 6 Jun 2006, 0:53:50 UTC

Doesn't look like the machines are hidden..... It just says the owner is anonymous.

hostid 143285
Wendy



Click Here for BOINC FAQ Service
ID: 328162 · Report as offensive
Alinator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Apr 05
Posts: 4178
Credit: 4,647,982
RAC: 0
United States
Message 328166 - Posted: 6 Jun 2006, 0:58:39 UTC - in response to Message 328162.  

Doesn't look like the machines are hidden..... It just says the owner is anonymous.

hostid 143285


But you can't tell who owns it. So you could say from the machines POV the owner is hidden.

Alinator
ID: 328166 · Report as offensive
web03
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 01
Posts: 355
Credit: 719,156
RAC: 0
United States
Message 328169 - Posted: 6 Jun 2006, 1:01:08 UTC

I think I must have had too much beer last night...

<grins>

Guess I wasn't expecting to see as much as I did, if they were hidden.
ID: 328169 · Report as offensive
Alinator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Apr 05
Posts: 4178
Credit: 4,647,982
RAC: 0
United States
Message 328177 - Posted: 6 Jun 2006, 1:05:13 UTC - in response to Message 328169.  

I think I must have had too much beer last night...

<grins>

Guess I wasn't expecting to see as much as I did, if they were hidden.


LOL, Been there.... Done that! :-)

Alinator
ID: 328177 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : Whats up with this?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.