Project Upgrade to version 4.x

Message boards : Number crunching : Project Upgrade to version 4.x
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 . . . 8 · Next

AuthorMessage
Heffed
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Mar 02
Posts: 1856
Credit: 40,736
RAC: 0
United States
Message 18462 - Posted: 27 Aug 2004, 23:01:23 UTC - in response to Message 18457.  

> Marc, who told you to download v.4.xx from CPDN? I couldn't see any official
> statement on Berkeley's site. I couldn't find it on the CPDN's one either.

Nobody told him. That's the point I was trying to make in a post I just made to this thread.

You can't fault Berkeley for not pointing users to an .exe on another projects web site that isn't currently compatible with the public S@H project. People are simply jumping the gun and getting mad at Berkeley for the inconvenience they had to suffer in doing the jumping.

I think it's best for people to just calm down. When the project is ready for it, the new .exe will be downloadable from this site.

ID: 18462 · Report as offensive
Barry Rumsey

Send message
Joined: 21 May 04
Posts: 17
Credit: 17,327
RAC: 0
New Zealand
Message 18464 - Posted: 27 Aug 2004, 23:12:01 UTC

So this will mean that I can upgrade Sunday morning?
It is 11:15am Saturday in NZ at the moment.

B.Rumsey
ID: 18464 · Report as offensive
Profile Wayne
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Oct 02
Posts: 13
Credit: 88,859
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 18465 - Posted: 27 Aug 2004, 23:12:28 UTC

Ok, so meanwhile, I've put my cache down to 0 days to 0 days, but it keeps downloading Predictor WU's once it gets to zero and theres nothing left to crunch... I want my cache empty so I can run classic until vers 4.x is out, but it keeps downloading more work. *frustration* My general preferences and preferences for home and work are set to keep enough work for zero days to zero days. Anyone know what i'm doing wrong?
ID: 18465 · Report as offensive
Profile Sir Ulli
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Oct 99
Posts: 2246
Credit: 6,136,250
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 18469 - Posted: 27 Aug 2004, 23:18:24 UTC

the Update will done, when the little Problems are solved...

original post

We are currently experiencing a hardware issue with our scheduling server, we expect this issues resolved within the hour

one Hour, ...

nothing knew, that little problems are going to Great Problems.

hope all is going good, and i get tomorrow new WUs.

but this is quite a good Joke

Anybody who has any remaining results to report should get them in before the upgrade,..

lol... my P4 3.2 has still 18 Results that has gone to the Server, but

SETI@home - 2004-08-28 01:17:47 - Temporarily failed upload of 21se03ab.25795.5632.203404.224_5_0
SETI@home - 2004-08-28 01:17:47 - Backing off 1 minutes and 13 seconds on transfer of file 21se03ab.25795.5632.203404.224_5_0


that is this for this


Greetings from Germany NRW
Ulli [/url]
ID: 18469 · Report as offensive
Profile Bruno G. Olsen & ESEA @ greenholt
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 May 99
Posts: 875
Credit: 4,386,984
RAC: 0
Denmark
Message 18470 - Posted: 27 Aug 2004, 23:19:49 UTC - in response to Message 18462.  

> > Marc, who told you to download v.4.xx from CPDN? I couldn't see any
> official
> > statement on Berkeley's site. I couldn't find it on the CPDN's one
> either.
>
> Nobody told him. That's the point I was trying to make in a post I just made
> to this thread.
>
> You can't fault Berkeley for not pointing users to an .exe on another projects
> web site that isn't currently compatible with the public S@H project. People
> are simply jumping the gun and getting mad at Berkeley for the inconvenience
> they had to suffer in doing the jumping.
>
> I think it's best for people to just calm down. When the project is ready for
> it, the new .exe will be downloadable from this site.

Right on :-)


S@h Berkeley's Staff Friends Club © member
ID: 18470 · Report as offensive
Ingleside
Volunteer developer

Send message
Joined: 4 Feb 03
Posts: 1546
Credit: 15,832,022
RAC: 13
Norway
Message 18472 - Posted: 27 Aug 2004, 23:24:57 UTC - in response to Message 18465.  

> Ok, so meanwhile, I've put my cache down to 0 days to 0 days, but it keeps
> downloading Predictor WU's once it gets to zero and theres nothing left to
> crunch... I want my cache empty so I can run classic until vers 4.x is out,
> but it keeps downloading more work. *frustration* My general preferences and
> preferences for home and work are set to keep enough work for zero days to
> zero days. Anyone know what i'm doing wrong?

The only way to make sure you're currently not downloading more work, is to increase the disk-limits so "Leave at least" # GB is bigger than your free disk space.

Note, since it's not always using the correct venue, remember to upgrade default + all others you're using.
ID: 18472 · Report as offensive
1mp0£173
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 8423
Credit: 356,897
RAC: 0
United States
Message 18473 - Posted: 27 Aug 2004, 23:25:33 UTC

Speaking as someone who writes software professionally....

We're all optimists. We always think things will be easier than they really are.

That's a good thing, because if our estimates were realistic, we'd probably take one look at the size of the task and run like hell.

So, here is the rule:

Whenever someone in the computer industry tells you how long something will take, double the number and go to the next higher unit.

So, we take one hour, double that, we take "hours" and go to the next higher unit which is days -- and that's when you should expect it to happen.

... and if someone says "we're wasting power!" that's simple: turn the machine off. We'll all still be here when you get back.
ID: 18473 · Report as offensive
texasfit
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 May 03
Posts: 223
Credit: 500,626
RAC: 0
United States
Message 18474 - Posted: 27 Aug 2004, 23:27:14 UTC

>
>
>August 27, 2004
>The upgrade to 4.x will start around 11am PDT and will take roughly an hour.
>
>

Somehow I think that we may have missed this time line. :-)

Just hanging out being patient and IDLE.
ID: 18474 · Report as offensive
Profile Sir Ulli
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Oct 99
Posts: 2246
Credit: 6,136,250
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 18475 - Posted: 27 Aug 2004, 23:29:54 UTC
Last modified: 27 Aug 2004, 23:32:17 UTC

Somehow I think that we may have missed this time line. :-)

you are not the only man, i think. and waiting waiting, and ...

[/url]
ID: 18475 · Report as offensive
Profile SlumLord
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Apr 02
Posts: 22
Credit: 280,351
RAC: 0
United States
Message 18487 - Posted: 27 Aug 2004, 23:40:17 UTC - in response to Message 18465.  
Last modified: 27 Aug 2004, 23:50:24 UTC

> Ok, so meanwhile, I've put my cache down to 0 days to 0 days, but it keeps
> downloading Predictor WU's once it gets to zero and theres nothing left to
> crunch... I want my cache empty so I can run classic until vers 4.x is out,
> but it keeps downloading more work. *frustration* My general preferences and
> preferences for home and work are set to keep enough work for zero days to
> zero days. Anyone know what i'm doing wrong?
>
I don't see where anyone has answered you, but I think you have to change your settings to 0 days/0 days on each project (aka Seti & Predictor).
ID: 18487 · Report as offensive
Profile Bruno G. Olsen & ESEA @ greenholt
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 May 99
Posts: 875
Credit: 4,386,984
RAC: 0
Denmark
Message 18489 - Posted: 27 Aug 2004, 23:44:49 UTC - in response to Message 18473.  

> Speaking as someone who writes software professionally....
>
> We're all optimists. We always think things will be easier than they really
> are.
>
> That's a good thing, because if our estimates were realistic, we'd probably
> take one look at the size of the task and run like hell.

hell, not even 6 months has past since I last underestimated the timescale on a project ;-) And I definately would have run like hell if I hadn't :-D


S@h Berkeley's Staff Friends Club © member
ID: 18489 · Report as offensive
Profile Bruno G. Olsen & ESEA @ greenholt
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 May 99
Posts: 875
Credit: 4,386,984
RAC: 0
Denmark
Message 18493 - Posted: 27 Aug 2004, 23:47:59 UTC - in response to Message 18487.  

> I don't see where anyone has answered you, probably because it's off topic and
> this isn't a support forum, but I think you have to change your settings to 0
> days/0 days on each project (aka Seti & Predictor).

can't be done - those settings are under "General" and should function for boinc/all projects


S@h Berkeley's Staff Friends Club © member
ID: 18493 · Report as offensive
1mp0£173
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 8423
Credit: 356,897
RAC: 0
United States
Message 18494 - Posted: 27 Aug 2004, 23:48:21 UTC - in response to Message 18489.  

So, basically, you haven't started any new projects in the past six months? (ducking)

Just double the number and go to the next higher unit....

> hell, not even 6 months has past since I last underestimated the timescale on
> a project ;-) And I definately would have run like hell if I hadn't :-D

ID: 18494 · Report as offensive
Profile Bruno G. Olsen & ESEA @ greenholt
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 May 99
Posts: 875
Credit: 4,386,984
RAC: 0
Denmark
Message 18501 - Posted: 28 Aug 2004, 0:00:30 UTC - in response to Message 18494.  

> So, basically, you haven't started any new projects in the past six months?
> (ducking)

actually no *lol* had to finish that one and then *ahhh* summer vacation ;-)

ahh, well, I'll propably never become a pro anyway ;-)


S@h Berkeley's Staff Friends Club © member
ID: 18501 · Report as offensive
Arm

Send message
Joined: 12 Sep 03
Posts: 308
Credit: 15,584,777
RAC: 0
Message 18502 - Posted: 28 Aug 2004, 0:00:38 UTC - in response to Message 18462.  

> > Marc, who told you to download v.4.xx from CPDN? I couldn't see any
> official
> > statement on Berkeley's site. I couldn't find it on the CPDN's one
> either.
>
> Nobody told him. That's the point I was trying to make in a post I just made
> to this thread.
>
> You can't fault Berkeley for not pointing users to an .exe on another projects
> web site that isn't currently compatible with the public S@H project. People
> are simply jumping the gun and getting mad at Berkeley for the inconvenience
> they had to suffer in doing the jumping.
>
> I think it's best for people to just calm down. When the project is ready for
> it, the new .exe will be downloadable from this site.
>
Exactly what I meant
ID: 18502 · Report as offensive
Profile Wayne
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Oct 02
Posts: 13
Credit: 88,859
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 18521 - Posted: 28 Aug 2004, 0:40:05 UTC - in response to Message 18497.  
Last modified: 28 Aug 2004, 0:42:58 UTC

Thanks for your help guys :) Setting to zero/zero did nothing, but setting the "Leave at least" to 200Gb stopped new WU's from downloading. It's still trying to download, but here's what I get...

--- - 2004-08-28 10:06:45 - Fewer active results than CPUs; requesting more work
Predictor@home - 2004-08-28 10:06:45 - Requesting 1 seconds of work
Predictor@home - 2004-08-28 10:06:45 - Sending request to scheduler: http://predictor.scripps.edu/predictor_cgi/cgi
Predictor@home - 2004-08-28 10:06:48 - Scheduler RPC to http://predictor.scripps.edu/predictor_cgi/cgi succeeded
Predictor@home - 2004-08-28 10:06:48 - Message from server: No work available (there was work but you don't have enough disk space allocated)
Predictor@home - 2004-08-28 10:06:48 - No work from project
Predictor@home - 2004-08-28 10:06:48 - Deferring communication with project for 1 hours, 0 minutes, and 0 seconds



Any my cache is empty, so its SETI Classic for me until v4.x is released :)

(and I dont mind if I have to wait, they wouldnt make us wait without a good reason).
ID: 18521 · Report as offensive
Profile Jord
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 99
Posts: 15184
Credit: 4,362,181
RAC: 3
Netherlands
Message 18524 - Posted: 28 Aug 2004, 0:45:58 UTC

The latest message:
SETI@home - 2004-08-28 02:45:25 - Message from server: To participate in this project, you must use major version 3 of the BOINC core client. Your core client is major version 4.
SETI@home - 2004-08-28 02:45:26 - Resetting project
SETI@home - 2004-08-28 02:45:26 - Detaching from project

:D

The schedulers are back up for 3.xx
Upload now.


----------------------
Jordâ„¢

ID: 18524 · Report as offensive
Profile xi3piscium
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 99
Posts: 287
Credit: 26,674
RAC: 0
China
Message 18529 - Posted: 28 Aug 2004, 0:49:20 UTC - in response to Message 18524.  
Last modified: 28 Aug 2004, 0:49:39 UTC

> The latest message:
> SETI@home - 2004-08-28 02:45:25 - Message from server: To participate in this
> project, you must use major version 3 of the BOINC core client. Your core
> client is major version 4.
> SETI@home - 2004-08-28 02:45:26 - Resetting project
> SETI@home - 2004-08-28 02:45:26 - Detaching from project

Jord, but can we download anything for 3.20?
ID: 18529 · Report as offensive
Profile Jord
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 99
Posts: 15184
Credit: 4,362,181
RAC: 3
Netherlands
Message 18531 - Posted: 28 Aug 2004, 0:51:02 UTC

Doubtful. I wouldn't try it, xi3.

It may just be a fluke on Seti's part or a way to allow you to upload your last 3.xx units & report them now. :)
----------------------
Jordâ„¢

ID: 18531 · Report as offensive
Profile KWSN - MajorKong
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 00
Posts: 2892
Credit: 1,499,890
RAC: 0
United States
Message 18534 - Posted: 28 Aug 2004, 0:55:55 UTC

one of my computers running v3.20 just tried to get some work units from S@H... it came up with a bunch of 'file not found' errors.

2004-08-27 19:50:41 [---] Fewer active results than CPUs; requesting more work
2004-08-27 19:50:41 [SETI@home] Requesting 162435 seconds of work
2004-08-27 19:50:41 [SETI@home] Sending request to scheduler: http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi
2004-08-27 19:50:50 [SETI@home] Scheduler RPC to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded
2004-08-27 19:50:51 [SETI@home] Started download of 25ap04aa.23553.10594.317312.104
2004-08-27 19:50:51 [SETI@home] Started download of 25ap04aa.23553.10594.317312.105
2004-08-27 19:50:52 [SETI@home] Temporarily failed download of 25ap04aa.23553.10594.317312.104
2004-08-27 19:50:52 [SETI@home] Giving up on download of 25ap04aa.23553.10594.317312.104: file was not found on server
2004-08-27 19:50:52 [SETI@home] Unrecoverable error for result 25ap04aa.23553.10594.317312.104_0 (file transfer error: couldn't get input files:
25ap04aa.23553.10594.317312.104: file was not found on server
)
2004-08-27 19:50:52 [SETI@home] Deferring communication with project for 1 minutes and 0 seconds

------------
KWSN-MajorKong
KWSN Forum Admin (retired)
http://www.kwsnforum.com

BOINC Beta tester
Member of the 'Magnificent 7'

ID: 18534 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 . . . 8 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Project Upgrade to version 4.x


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.