HT on or off?

Message boards : Number crunching : HT on or off?

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Mahbubur

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 06
Posts: 10
Credit: 6,760
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 302216 - Posted: 10 May 2006, 23:37:33 UTC

I'm fairly new to DC, but should i have hyperthreading on or off when crunching?


ID: 302216 · Report as offensive
Profile Geek@Play
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 31 Jul 01
Posts: 2467
Credit: 86,146,931
RAC: 0
United States
Message 302220 - Posted: 10 May 2006, 23:49:03 UTC

In life there are many truths.

Faster is better..........
Bigger is better..........
HT on is better...........


Boinc....Boinc....Boinc....Boinc....

ID: 302220 · Report as offensive
Mahbubur

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 06
Posts: 10
Credit: 6,760
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 302221 - Posted: 10 May 2006, 23:50:27 UTC - in response to Message 302220.  

In life there are many truths.

Faster is better..........
Bigger is better..........
HT on is better...........



lol, ok thx

ID: 302221 · Report as offensive
Profile Changeling

Send message
Joined: 24 May 99
Posts: 27
Credit: 14,432,587
RAC: 0
United States
Message 302223 - Posted: 11 May 2006, 0:00:47 UTC
Last modified: 11 May 2006, 0:02:28 UTC

One thing to consider, if the computer is a laptop with a p4 intel chip, you may get overheating problems. My fastest cruncher is a laptop, when I turn on HT, it gets way too hot, and the fan screams all the time. I leave it off. Just my opinion. :-)

ID: 302223 · Report as offensive
Profile Crunch3rProject Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Apr 99
Posts: 1546
Credit: 3,438,544
RAC: 1
Germany
Message 302234 - Posted: 11 May 2006, 0:21:14 UTC - in response to Message 302220.  

In life there are many truths.

Faster is better..........
Bigger is better..........
HT on is better...........


Hmmm... well i think HT turned OFF is actually faster on Rnhanced WUs.
IMHO that's what i'be seen but you can prove me wrong one that one.




Join BOINC United now!

ID: 302234 · Report as offensive
Profile Geek@Play
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 31 Jul 01
Posts: 2467
Credit: 86,146,931
RAC: 0
United States
Message 302236 - Posted: 11 May 2006, 0:24:56 UTC - in response to Message 302234.  

In life there are many truths.

Faster is better..........
Bigger is better..........
HT on is better...........


Hmmm... well i think HT turned OFF is actually faster on Rnhanced WUs.
IMHO that's what i'be seen but you can prove me wrong one that one.




You would certainly know better than I! If you can publish a reference work unit then I could prove it for myself. Thanks.



Boinc....Boinc....Boinc....Boinc....

ID: 302236 · Report as offensive
archae86

Send message
Joined: 31 Aug 99
Posts: 909
Credit: 1,582,816
RAC: 0
United States
Message 302255 - Posted: 11 May 2006, 0:50:32 UTC - in response to Message 302234.  

[
Hmmm... well i think HT turned OFF is actually faster on Rnhanced WUs.
IMHO that's what i'be seen but you can prove me wrong one that one.
Over in Einstein, after initial skepticism, we have agreed that for some of akosf's wonderful optimized versions HT with both threads running Einstein is definitely less productive than the same host running Einstein with HT turned off for Prescott, Gallatin, and possibly other hosts.

However, running HT under trux tx36 using the line:

<priority_projects>Einstein@Home,SETI@Home</priority_projects>

in truxoft_prefs.xml to force one Einstein and one SETI job at all times when work available continues to give wonderful enhanced productivity, even with akosf S41.07 (not the special HT version) and SETI enhanced 4.12 (crunch3r version).

So if you like both projects, and don't mind a fixed 50/50 resource allocation (using the priority projects mechanism causes the preferences resource allocation to be ignored, I think) this is a highly productive move.

ID: 302255 · Report as offensive
WinterKnight
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 10189
Credit: 30,541,535
RAC: 3,560
United Kingdom
Message 302349 - Posted: 11 May 2006, 3:04:05 UTC

@crunch3r
But is it at least twice as fast?

@Geek@play
There is a reference unit on Marisan's site, Reference unit CPU time Comparison Which was used to test TMR's initial optimisation.

@archae86
Been running dual P3 like that by having 'connect to network' setting at 0.05 days so only one unit of each project on computer at any one time for nearly a year, and for seti it gives boost of over 10% compared to running two seti units. Haven't looked at running two Einstein since akosf's optimisation.

Andy

ID: 302349 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : HT on or off?


 
©2016 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.