pentium 4 2.80GHz stats

Message boards : Number crunching : pentium 4 2.80GHz stats
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile RePhLeX

Send message
Joined: 3 Dec 05
Posts: 76
Credit: 128,962
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 283185 - Posted: 16 Apr 2006, 21:18:11 UTC

HOW can the following be doing wus so quickly..And how the hell do you get those figures using 1gig of ram?.


CPU type GenuineIntel
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz
Number of CPUs 1
Operating System Microsoft Windows XP
Professional Edition, Service Pack 2, (05.01.2600.00)
Memory 1014.07 MB
Cache 976.56 KB
Measured floating point speed 15354.81 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 5270.92 million ops/sec


Does wu's in 2000s, thats just over a half hour to you and me..not just 1 or 2 wus, all.


I dont understand.
ID: 283185 · Report as offensive
Profile Hopper
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Mar 06
Posts: 21
Credit: 30,126
RAC: 0
United States
Message 283191 - Posted: 16 Apr 2006, 21:28:15 UTC - in response to Message 283185.  

I've seen a few setups like that with the extreme FPU numbers. Obviously they are using an optimized client, which one. your guess is as good as mine.
ID: 283191 · Report as offensive
Profile Sparky
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 10 Dec 04
Posts: 66
Credit: 414,984
RAC: 0
United States
Message 283199 - Posted: 16 Apr 2006, 21:43:19 UTC - in response to Message 283185.  
Last modified: 16 Apr 2006, 21:43:57 UTC

HOW can the following be doing wus so quickly..And how the hell do you get those figures using 1gig of ram?.


CPU type GenuineIntel
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz
Number of CPUs 1
Operating System Microsoft Windows XP
Professional Edition, Service Pack 2, (05.01.2600.00)
Memory 1014.07 MB
Cache 976.56 KB
Measured floating point speed 15354.81 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 5270.92 million ops/sec


Does wu's in 2000s, thats just over a half hour to you and me..not just 1 or 2 wus, all.


I dont understand.


my guess:

he is running the Crunch3r optimized aplication(SSE-2), non-hyper-threaded, slightly over clocked, with an extreme ventilation (possibly water cooled) set-up. If I wasn't running HT, many of my machines would be turning WU as fast, or at least close to his times.

Sparky

[edited for spelling errors]
ID: 283199 · Report as offensive
Profile Ghery S. Pettit
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Nov 99
Posts: 325
Credit: 28,109,066
RAC: 82
United States
Message 283207 - Posted: 16 Apr 2006, 22:02:35 UTC

I've got a simple laptop with a 1.4 GHz Intel(R) Celeron(R) M processor that is cranking them out in 8000-10000 seconds. With twice the speed, and the other advantages of a Pentium 4 processor I'm not surprised to see it 4 to 5 times as fast as my laptop. And I've only got 512 MBytes of RAM. Keep on crunching.
ID: 283207 · Report as offensive
Profile Ralf02061973
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Jul 00
Posts: 54
Credit: 9,983,656
RAC: 8
Germany
Message 283306 - Posted: 17 Apr 2006, 2:21:16 UTC

with an optimiced client and overclocking ist it possible

my pentium-d 820 crunch 2 wu´s under 1800sec

greetings
ralf
Boinc runs here on:
Intel i7-3770K + IntelHD4000
Android-Stick-ARM-Cotex-A17
Sony-Z5C-ARM-Cortex-A53/A57
Nvidia GT-630 / Nvidia GTX-750Ti
ID: 283306 · Report as offensive
Profile RePhLeX

Send message
Joined: 3 Dec 05
Posts: 76
Credit: 128,962
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 283437 - Posted: 17 Apr 2006, 6:58:54 UTC

THats some serious tweaking then..


Maybe i need to have a fiddle too.


ID: 283437 · Report as offensive
Profile [B@H] Ray
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Sep 00
Posts: 485
Credit: 45,275
RAC: 0
United States
Message 283444 - Posted: 17 Apr 2006, 7:43:19 UTC
Last modified: 17 Apr 2006, 7:46:21 UTC

That is not as bad as this Pentium D 2.4 that I came accrost. And he is doing 2 at a time. I thought the slowest Pentium D made was the 2.66?? This has to be faster than a 2.4, BOINC reading the CPU wrong or something.

Many units turned in at ~850 seconds. But he (or she) is using the standard BOINC with the optomized SETI so claiming real low on the credit.
ID: 283444 · Report as offensive
Profile [B@H] Ray
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Sep 00
Posts: 485
Credit: 45,275
RAC: 0
United States
Message 283635 - Posted: 17 Apr 2006, 15:45:52 UTC - in response to Message 283444.  

That is not as bad as this Pentium D 2.4 that I came accrost. And he is doing 2 at a time. I thought the slowest Pentium D made was the 2.66?? This has to be faster than a 2.4, BOINC reading the CPU wrong or something.

Many units turned in at ~850 seconds. But he (or she) is using the standard BOINC with the optomized SETI so claiming real low on the credit.


Wow, that has turned in 118 units already today, and there are still 8 hours left to the day. Wonder what MB he is using.
ID: 283635 · Report as offensive
Profile S.L.Chia
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 98
Credit: 2,667,122
RAC: 1
Malaysia
Message 283641 - Posted: 17 Apr 2006, 15:51:42 UTC - in response to Message 283635.  

That is not as bad as this Pentium D 2.4 that I came accrost. And he is doing 2 at a time. I thought the slowest Pentium D made was the 2.66?? This has to be faster than a 2.4, BOINC reading the CPU wrong or something.

Many units turned in at ~850 seconds. But he (or she) is using the standard BOINC with the optomized SETI so claiming real low on the credit.


Wow, that has turned in 118 units already today, and there are still 8 hours left to the day. Wonder what MB he is using.


seems he/she has overclock the system to ??ghz...
it is impossible for a p4d 2.4ghz to cruch 2 wu in ~850sec...
ID: 283641 · Report as offensive
Stefan
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Nov 05
Posts: 226
Credit: 213,560
RAC: 0
United States
Message 283747 - Posted: 17 Apr 2006, 19:31:42 UTC - in response to Message 283444.  

That is not as bad as this Pentium D 2.4 that I came accrost. And he is doing 2 at a time. I thought the slowest Pentium D made was the 2.66?? This has to be faster than a 2.4, BOINC reading the CPU wrong or something.

Many units turned in at ~850 seconds. But he (or she) is using the standard BOINC with the optomized SETI so claiming real low on the credit.


Most likely its the Pentium celeron 2.4 ghz processor...

The Pentium D proccessor starts, as you said, at 2.66.


Human Stupidity Is Infinite...

ID: 283747 · Report as offensive
Profile Clyde C. Phillips, III

Send message
Joined: 2 Aug 00
Posts: 1851
Credit: 5,955,047
RAC: 0
United States
Message 283750 - Posted: 17 Apr 2006, 19:35:21 UTC

I go to "Top Computers" at the right of the main page. With Pentium Ds I see that the great majority use Windows XpPro, but I see a few Win Servers and Linuxes. The three I checked with XpHome don't seem to have worse times, although the one that has four processes (must be a D955 Extreme hyperthreadable dual-core) turns out crummy throughput inferior to that of the other two-threaded setups. Maybe XpHome is sufficient for Pentium Ds and won't hurt throughput. But it looks like the 955 stinks. Multipliers (true time over tabular time) was about 0.556, 0.664 (and 0.795 for the 4-process 955(?)). This sample (three total) is very small, though.
ID: 283750 · Report as offensive
Profile [B@H] Ray
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Sep 00
Posts: 485
Credit: 45,275
RAC: 0
United States
Message 283977 - Posted: 18 Apr 2006, 4:23:17 UTC - in response to Message 283747.  

That is not as bad as this Pentium D 2.4 that I came accrost. And he is doing 2 at a time. I thought the slowest Pentium D made was the 2.66?? This has to be faster than a 2.4, BOINC reading the CPU wrong or something.

Many units turned in at ~850 seconds. But he (or she) is using the standard BOINC with the optomized SETI so claiming real low on the credit.


Most likely its the Pentium celeron 2.4 ghz processor...

The Pentium D proccessor starts, as you said, at 2.66.


The 2.66 is the slowest Pentium D that I have seen, but a celeron would not do those times eather. The computer ID page for that one says:

GenuineIntel
Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 000 @ 2.40GHz

Why the CPU 000, I have no idea.
ID: 283977 · Report as offensive
Profile Darth Dogbytes™
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 30 Jul 03
Posts: 7512
Credit: 2,021,148
RAC: 0
United States
Message 283984 - Posted: 18 Apr 2006, 4:55:38 UTC - in response to Message 283977.  
Last modified: 18 Apr 2006, 4:56:10 UTC

That is not as bad as this Pentium D 2.4 that I came accrost. And he is doing 2 at a time. I thought the slowest Pentium D made was the 2.66?? This has to be faster than a 2.4, BOINC reading the CPU wrong or something.

Many units turned in at ~850 seconds. But he (or she) is using the standard BOINC with the optomized SETI so claiming real low on the credit.


Most likely its the Pentium celeron 2.4 ghz processor...

The Pentium D proccessor starts, as you said, at 2.66.


The 2.66 is the slowest Pentium D that I have seen, but a celeron would not do those times eather. The computer ID page for that one says:

GenuineIntel
Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 000 @ 2.40GHz

Why the CPU 000, I have no idea.

Why even bother to compare the Celeron D's in the first place...their L2 cache is only 250Kb x 2 compared to 1Mb x 2 for the Pentium D.
Account frozen...
ID: 283984 · Report as offensive
Profile Ralf02061973
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Jul 00
Posts: 54
Credit: 9,983,656
RAC: 8
Germany
Message 284005 - Posted: 18 Apr 2006, 6:34:31 UTC

@dogbytes
only for info
there is no celeron-d dual core
they are all single cores
Boinc runs here on:
Intel i7-3770K + IntelHD4000
Android-Stick-ARM-Cotex-A17
Sony-Z5C-ARM-Cortex-A53/A57
Nvidia GT-630 / Nvidia GTX-750Ti
ID: 284005 · Report as offensive
Profile Crunch3r
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Apr 99
Posts: 1546
Credit: 3,438,823
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 284047 - Posted: 18 Apr 2006, 7:49:40 UTC - in response to Message 283977.  

That is not as bad as this Pentium D 2.4 that I came accrost. And he is doing 2 at a time. I thought the slowest Pentium D made was the 2.66?? This has to be faster than a 2.4, BOINC reading the CPU wrong or something.

Many units turned in at ~850 seconds. But he (or she) is using the standard BOINC with the optomized SETI so claiming real low on the credit.


Most likely its the Pentium celeron 2.4 ghz processor...

The Pentium D proccessor starts, as you said, at 2.66.


The 2.66 is the slowest Pentium D that I have seen, but a celeron would not do those times eather. The computer ID page for that one says:

GenuineIntel
Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 000 @ 2.40GHz

Why the CPU 000, I have no idea.



It's an 2.4GHz Intel Conroe.



Join BOINC United now!
ID: 284047 · Report as offensive
Profile Rafael Cesare Valente "CrackBoy"

Send message
Joined: 28 Nov 04
Posts: 38
Credit: 468,002
RAC: 0
Brazil
Message 284132 - Posted: 18 Apr 2006, 11:38:52 UTC - in response to Message 284047.  
Last modified: 18 Apr 2006, 11:40:13 UTC

That is not as bad as this Pentium D 2.4 that I came accrost. And he is doing 2 at a time. I thought the slowest Pentium D made was the 2.66?? This has to be faster than a 2.4, BOINC reading the CPU wrong or something.

Many units turned in at ~850 seconds. But he (or she) is using the standard BOINC with the optomized SETI so claiming real low on the credit.


Most likely its the Pentium celeron 2.4 ghz processor...

The Pentium D proccessor starts, as you said, at 2.66.


The 2.66 is the slowest Pentium D that I have seen, but a celeron would not do those times eather. The computer ID page for that one says:

GenuineIntel
Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 000 @ 2.40GHz

Why the CPU 000, I have no idea.



It's an 2.4GHz Intel Conroe.



It´s not so impossible a 2.4GHz doing in 2000 seconds per WU...

I Have a P4E 3.0GHz Prescott SSE3 ( HT Disabled ) Socket 478 with an Asus P4P800E-Deluxe running at 4.05 GHz ( 270 FSB Quadpumped = 1080 MHz ) running on AIR, no Watercooling, doing a WU in :

4/18/2006 7:00:02 AM|SETI@home|CC calibration: 6.39 >> 22.01 (time: 1116s >> 1536s / Gfpops: 2.19 >> 17.04)

Details ( Using Crunch3r SSE3 S@H Executable + Trux Boinc Calibrating Client ):

4/17/2006 9:43:25 PM||Processor: 1 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz
4/17/2006 9:48:08 PM||Running CPU benchmarks
4/17/2006 9:49:07 PM||Benchmark results:
4/17/2006 9:49:07 PM|| Number of CPUs: 1
4/17/2006 9:49:07 PM|| 2190 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
4/17/2006 9:49:07 PM|| 7713 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
4/17/2006 9:49:07 PM||Finished CPU benchmarks

Best Regards,

Rafael Valente

ID: 284132 · Report as offensive
Stefan
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Nov 05
Posts: 226
Credit: 213,560
RAC: 0
United States
Message 284290 - Posted: 18 Apr 2006, 21:15:44 UTC - in response to Message 284132.  

That is not as bad as this Pentium D 2.4 that I came accrost. And he is doing 2 at a time. I thought the slowest Pentium D made was the 2.66?? This has to be faster than a 2.4, BOINC reading the CPU wrong or something.

Many units turned in at ~850 seconds. But he (or she) is using the standard BOINC with the optomized SETI so claiming real low on the credit.


Most likely its the Pentium celeron 2.4 ghz processor...

The Pentium D proccessor starts, as you said, at 2.66.


The 2.66 is the slowest Pentium D that I have seen, but a celeron would not do those times eather. The computer ID page for that one says:

GenuineIntel
Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 000 @ 2.40GHz

Why the CPU 000, I have no idea.



It's an 2.4GHz Intel Conroe.



It´s not so impossible a 2.4GHz doing in 2000 seconds per WU...

I Have a P4E 3.0GHz Prescott SSE3 ( HT Disabled ) Socket 478 with an Asus P4P800E-Deluxe running at 4.05 GHz ( 270 FSB Quadpumped = 1080 MHz ) running on AIR, no Watercooling, doing a WU in :

4/18/2006 7:00:02 AM|SETI@home|CC calibration: 6.39 >> 22.01 (time: 1116s >> 1536s / Gfpops: 2.19 >> 17.04)

Details ( Using Crunch3r SSE3 S@H Executable + Trux Boinc Calibrating Client ):

4/17/2006 9:43:25 PM||Processor: 1 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz
4/17/2006 9:48:08 PM||Running CPU benchmarks
4/17/2006 9:49:07 PM||Benchmark results:
4/17/2006 9:49:07 PM|| Number of CPUs: 1
4/17/2006 9:49:07 PM|| 2190 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
4/17/2006 9:49:07 PM|| 7713 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
4/17/2006 9:49:07 PM||Finished CPU benchmarks

Best Regards,

Rafael Valente


P4 3.0Ghz running at 4.05 with no water cooling and it doesnt overheat?

Nice...
Human Stupidity Is Infinite...

ID: 284290 · Report as offensive
Profile thinksnow

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 02
Posts: 41
Credit: 505,798
RAC: 0
United States
Message 284333 - Posted: 18 Apr 2006, 22:16:59 UTC
Last modified: 18 Apr 2006, 22:29:37 UTC

Using Crunch3r SSE3 S@H exe and the "Boinc_5.2.13_P3_AthlonXP_SSE" BOINC exe:

AMD Opteron 165 (dual-core), stock 1.8, O/C'ed to 2.466GHz on air & 1Gb DDR400 on dual-channel @ 224.2MHz (=~DDR450).

4/17/2006 9:03:17 PM||Running CPU benchmarks
4/17/2006 9:03:17 PM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
4/17/2006 9:04:16 PM||Benchmark results:
4/17/2006 9:04:16 PM|| Number of CPUs: 2
4/17/2006 9:04:16 PM|| 2739 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
4/17/2006 9:04:16 PM|| 8758 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
4/17/2006 9:04:16 PM||Finished CPU benchmarks

I'm at 2600-2700 seconds.
-----------------------------------------------------------
My P4 2.8E with the same optimizations does this:

4/17/2006 9:06:52 PM||Running CPU benchmarks
4/17/2006 9:07:51 PM||Benchmark results:
4/17/2006 9:07:51 PM|| Number of CPUs: 2
4/17/2006 9:07:51 PM|| 1422 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
4/17/2006 9:07:51 PM|| 3143 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
4/17/2006 9:07:51 PM||Finished CPU benchmarks

And takes 4000-5000 seconds.

Main rig: AMD Opteron 165 Dual Core, 2Gb PC3200, 450Gb onboard + 1Tb RAID-5 NAS
HTPC1: P4 2.8E, 1.5Gb PC3200, 3x80Gb SATA, Fusion5Lite + PVR-250, Sony 50A10 50" HD-LCD
HTPC2: P4 2.8E, 1GB PC3200, 200Gb PATA, PVR-250, JVC 32" tube
ID: 284333 · Report as offensive
Profile Rafael Cesare Valente "CrackBoy"

Send message
Joined: 28 Nov 04
Posts: 38
Credit: 468,002
RAC: 0
Brazil
Message 284406 - Posted: 18 Apr 2006, 23:17:05 UTC - in response to Message 284290.  

That is not as bad as this Pentium D 2.4 that I came accrost. And he is doing 2 at a time. I thought the slowest Pentium D made was the 2.66?? This has to be faster than a 2.4, BOINC reading the CPU wrong or something.

Many units turned in at ~850 seconds. But he (or she) is using the standard BOINC with the optomized SETI so claiming real low on the credit.


Most likely its the Pentium celeron 2.4 ghz processor...

The Pentium D proccessor starts, as you said, at 2.66.


The 2.66 is the slowest Pentium D that I have seen, but a celeron would not do those times eather. The computer ID page for that one says:

GenuineIntel
Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 000 @ 2.40GHz

Why the CPU 000, I have no idea.



It's an 2.4GHz Intel Conroe.



It´s not so impossible a 2.4GHz doing in 2000 seconds per WU...

I Have a P4E 3.0GHz Prescott SSE3 ( HT Disabled ) Socket 478 with an Asus P4P800E-Deluxe running at 4.05 GHz ( 270 FSB Quadpumped = 1080 MHz ) running on AIR, no Watercooling, doing a WU in :

4/18/2006 7:00:02 AM|SETI@home|CC calibration: 6.39 >> 22.01 (time: 1116s >> 1536s / Gfpops: 2.19 >> 17.04)

Details ( Using Crunch3r SSE3 S@H Executable + Trux Boinc Calibrating Client ):

4/17/2006 9:43:25 PM||Processor: 1 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz
4/17/2006 9:48:08 PM||Running CPU benchmarks
4/17/2006 9:49:07 PM||Benchmark results:
4/17/2006 9:49:07 PM|| Number of CPUs: 1
4/17/2006 9:49:07 PM|| 2190 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
4/17/2006 9:49:07 PM|| 7713 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
4/17/2006 9:49:07 PM||Finished CPU benchmarks

Best Regards,

Rafael Valente


P4 3.0Ghz running at 4.05 with no water cooling and it doesnt overheat?

Nice...


Doing SETI 100% of the Time, Temp Reading 60C FULL LOAD. Artic Silver 5, and a "generic" cooper Polish cooler. =)

Best Regards,

Rafael Valente

ID: 284406 · Report as offensive
Hans Dorn
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 2262
Credit: 26,448,570
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 284413 - Posted: 18 Apr 2006, 23:25:35 UTC - in response to Message 284047.  


It's an 2.4GHz Intel Conroe.


Hi Crunch3r, that would be an ES part, right?

Do you have any details on this system?


Regards Hans
ID: 284413 · Report as offensive
1 · 2 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : pentium 4 2.80GHz stats


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.