Questions and Answers :
Wish list :
workload validation?
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Gianarth Send message Joined: 5 Dec 00 Posts: 1 Credit: 7,982 RAC: 0 |
As I understand it, each WU is dispatched to 3 different computers and only when all 3 have arrived at the same result, is anyone granted a credit. It would be quite nice it the WU was dispatched to 3 computers that worked at roughly the same speed:-) As it stands I have 'n' WU's completed and am awaiting 2 slower machines completing their runs on those WU's. Now I dont have the fastest machine on the planet, but I can imagine what the person who does must be feeling when they complete 200+WU per diem and the other machines are only completing 1 WU per month:-/ Since Boinc can and does benchmark the machine its running on, the use of that benchmark result to select other machines of a similar benchmark is possible if the benchmark result is transmitted to the boinc server and there is software on the server capable of acting on that data. |
Heffed Send message Joined: 19 Mar 02 Posts: 1856 Credit: 40,736 RAC: 0 |
Nice concept, but that's asking a bit much of the scheduler. It's really not that bad. In beta, there was a fairly limited number of participants, so you would get some fairly large pending credit lists. I suspect the turnaround time to improve with the public release, as there will be many more people processing WUs. :) |
John McLeod VII Send message Joined: 15 Jul 99 Posts: 24806 Credit: 790,712 RAC: 0 |
Another factor is the queue length. Even with a fast processor if I have my queue set to 7 days max and .5 days min, it will be 6.5 days before any of the work is returned. jm7 |
Heffed Send message Joined: 19 Mar 02 Posts: 1856 Credit: 40,736 RAC: 0 |
> Another factor is the queue length. Even with a fast processor if I have my > queue set to 7 days max and .5 days min, it will be 6.5 days before any of the > work is returned. Good point John. :) |
nightowl Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 70 Credit: 948 RAC: 0 |
> > Another factor is the queue length. Even with a fast processor if I have > my > > queue set to 7 days max and .5 days min, it will be 6.5 days before any > of the > > work is returned. > > Good point John. :) > unless of course, you are working ont he computer and manually return the wu's, like I do ttyl Jeff |
Tiziano Send message Joined: 20 Aug 00 Posts: 4 Credit: 3,982 RAC: 0 |
> unless of course, you are working ont he computer and manually return the > wu's, like I do > ttyl > Jeff > how can I return my WU´s manually????????????????????????????? :-? |
[B^S] JESpaul Send message Joined: 5 Apr 01 Posts: 4 Credit: 809,208 RAC: 0 |
> Nice concept, but that's asking a bit much of the scheduler. > > It's really not that bad. In beta, there was a fairly limited number of > participants, so you would get some fairly large pending credit lists. I > suspect the turnaround time to improve with the public release, as there will > be many more people processing WUs. :) > What happens is one of the other 2 copies of 'my' WU gets lost? Do I never get credit? |
John McLeod VII Send message Joined: 15 Jul 99 Posts: 24806 Credit: 790,712 RAC: 0 |
|
John McLeod VII Send message Joined: 15 Jul 99 Posts: 24806 Credit: 790,712 RAC: 0 |
> > Nice concept, but that's asking a bit much of the scheduler. > > > > It's really not that bad. In beta, there was a fairly limited number of > > participants, so you would get some fairly large pending credit lists. I > > suspect the turnaround time to improve with the public release, as there > will > > be many more people processing WUs. :) > > > What happens is one of the other 2 copies of 'my' WU gets lost? Do I never > get credit? > If a result is not returned within the deadline (S@H 2 weeks, Predictor 5 days, CPDN rumored to be 6 months, F@H rumored to be 5 days), the WU is sent out to the number of hosts that did not return it in time. If one of those does not return the WU in time, the process repeats. The deadline is from the time that the WU is downloaded to the host. |
Tiziano Send message Joined: 20 Aug 00 Posts: 4 Credit: 3,982 RAC: 0 |
> > > unless of course, you are working ont he computer and manually > return > > the > > > wu's, like I do > > > ttyl > > > Jeff > > > > > how can I return my WU´s manually????????????????????????????? :-? > > > Right click on the project, and Update. > <a> href="http://www.boinc.dk/index.php?page=user_statistics&userid=9915"> > >right click on projekt only says: "show Graphics" |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.