I bet this has probably been pointed out at one stage or another in one thread or another...

But I feel like mentioning it now (again?)...

Go to google and search for failure.

How's that for the No.1 hit? hahaha

---

Kolch - Crunching for the BOINC@Australia team since July 2004.
Search for your own intelligence...

Yes it has;

Here Google Search Engine

---

Life on earth is the global equivalent of not storing things in the fridge.

Figures... Lol

---

Kolch - Crunching for the BOINC@Australia team since July 2004.
Search for your own intelligence...

Figures... Lol

That's ok Kolch, you can mention it again if you want. I had forgotten about it and plugged it in and got a good laugh. Thanks for the reminder.... >:-) (-:<

---

CAPT Siran d'Vel'nahr - L L & P _\\//
Winders 11 OS? "What a piece of junk!" - L. Skywalker
"Logic is the cement of our civilization with which we ascend from chaos using reason as our guide." - T'Plana-hath

Judging from the #2 hit, someone's trying to turn the tide on that bit of commentary.

---

From Google:

Googlebombing 'failure'
9/16/2005 12:54:00 PM
Posted by Marissa Mayer, Director of Consumer Web Products

If you do a Google search on the word [failure] or the phrase [miserable failure], the top result is currently the White House’s official biographical page for President Bush. We've received some complaints recently from users who assume that this reflects a political bias on our part. I'd like to explain how these results come up in order to allay these concerns.

Google's search results are generated by computer programs that rank web pages in large part by examining the number and relative popularity of the sites that link to them. By using a practice called googlebombing, however, determined pranksters can occasionally produce odd results. In this case, a number of webmasters use the phrases [failure] and [miserable failure] to describe and link to President Bush's website, thus pushing it to the top of searches for those phrases. We don't condone the practice of googlebombing, or any other action that seeks to affect the integrity of our search results, but we're also reluctant to alter our results by hand in order to prevent such items from showing up. Pranks like this may be distracting to some, but they don't affect the overall quality of our search service, whose objectivity, as always, remains the core of our mission.