Smallest hardware used for SETI crunching

Message boards : Number crunching : Smallest hardware used for SETI crunching
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile Martin A. Boegelund
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 00
Posts: 292
Credit: 387,485
RAC: 1
Denmark
Message 159908 - Posted: 30 Aug 2005, 13:49:20 UTC

Limbo time! How low can you go?

Hosts doing SETI crunching have to be big and fast, but I wondered what's the smallest hardware ever to deliver a usable result?

I've found a system footprint called Intel 99MHz (currently position 50 in this view) that seems to be capable of getting credits, but I wonder if anyone can show something even "smaller", whatever interpretation of "small" can be agreed on...?

"Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?"

ID: 159908 · Report as offensive
Profile PARTICLEX75
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Sep 99
Posts: 123
Credit: 7,443,272
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 159921 - Posted: 30 Aug 2005, 14:14:30 UTC

i have a 933mhz laptop and i think you'll find that from the result it's a typo
ID: 159921 · Report as offensive
Profile Pooh Bear 27
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Jul 03
Posts: 3224
Credit: 4,603,826
RAC: 0
United States
Message 159934 - Posted: 30 Aug 2005, 14:40:26 UTC

I have used as small as a P1-166MMx processor. It returned results, very slowly (I believe 5-6 days). I since retired those old machines.



My movie https://vimeo.com/manage/videos/502242
ID: 159934 · Report as offensive
Profile Martin A. Boegelund
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 00
Posts: 292
Credit: 387,485
RAC: 1
Denmark
Message 159936 - Posted: 30 Aug 2005, 14:51:02 UTC - in response to Message 159934.  

I have used as small as a P1-166MMx processor. It returned results, very slowly (I believe 5-6 days). I since retired those old machines.



That's an old bugger!
Can you tell any more? How much memory, OS, optimized clients, ...?

"Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?"

ID: 159936 · Report as offensive
itenginerd
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Aug 00
Posts: 37
Credit: 39,905
RAC: 0
United States
Message 159952 - Posted: 30 Aug 2005, 15:19:40 UTC

I used to use an old Sparc4-66MHz with 32 megs of ram in the day. Give me a 3 WU queue, and I wouldn't know about the outage for another week or so....

back in my first classic period.

(j)
James
ID: 159952 · Report as offensive
itenginerd
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Aug 00
Posts: 37
Credit: 39,905
RAC: 0
United States
Message 159953 - Posted: 30 Aug 2005, 15:20:21 UTC - in response to Message 159952.  

I used to use an old Sparc4-66MHz with 32 megs of ram in the day. Give me a 3 WU queue, and I wouldn't know about the outage for another week or so....

back in my first classic period.

(j)
James


heck, that was so long ago the results I turned in off that machine have been validated!

(j)
ID: 159953 · Report as offensive
Profile [B^S] Paul@home
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 20 Dec 99
Posts: 121
Credit: 1,885,420
RAC: 0
Ireland
Message 159954 - Posted: 30 Aug 2005, 15:21:34 UTC

My first ever SETI classic machine was a 75mhz P1 with 16MB ram and Win95. I then upgraded the CPU to a 133mhz... zooom!
Wanna visit BOINC Synergy? Click my stats!

Join BOINC Synergy Team
ID: 159954 · Report as offensive
Profile Pooh Bear 27
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Jul 03
Posts: 3224
Credit: 4,603,826
RAC: 0
United States
Message 159955 - Posted: 30 Aug 2005, 15:22:28 UTC - in response to Message 159936.  

I have used as small as a P1-166MMx processor. It returned results, very slowly (I believe 5-6 days). I since retired those old machines.

That's an old bugger!
Can you tell any more? How much memory, OS, optimized clients, ...?


It had 96M memory, no optimized clients. I believe 4.19 was the last client used on it. Windows 98SE. It was a small form factor, and is now in someones car being used with a GPS system. It's been retired since March.



My movie https://vimeo.com/manage/videos/502242
ID: 159955 · Report as offensive
Haakon Rasmussen
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 May 99
Posts: 18
Credit: 11,420,728
RAC: 64
Norway
Message 159956 - Posted: 30 Aug 2005, 15:29:27 UTC

What about running Boinc/Seti on a Mobile Phone whith Windows CE? Anybody tried it?
ID: 159956 · Report as offensive
itenginerd
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Aug 00
Posts: 37
Credit: 39,905
RAC: 0
United States
Message 159960 - Posted: 30 Aug 2005, 15:37:29 UTC - in response to Message 159956.  

What about running Boinc/Seti on a Mobile Phone whith Windows CE? Anybody tried it?


egads. That's scary! If you get it running, I may try it out on a couple of WinCE thin clients I have laying around the office... Heh.
ID: 159960 · Report as offensive
Profile skykInsomnio
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Nov 02
Posts: 9
Credit: 46,209
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 159961 - Posted: 30 Aug 2005, 15:39:25 UTC

i managed to install FreeBSD and BOINC on my old peacock notebook (33mhz/4mb ram/60mb hdd/9" bw-display) - cause it has no lan or pcmcia slot, i used a plip (tcp/ip via parallelport) connection to download/upload the workunits :)

unfortunately, the cpu didnt agree with the 2 weeks deadline :/
~ phainomenon ~
ID: 159961 · Report as offensive
Profile jshenry1963

Send message
Joined: 17 Nov 04
Posts: 182
Credit: 68,878
RAC: 0
United States
Message 159981 - Posted: 30 Aug 2005, 16:36:13 UTC

I use to do seti in my own mind, but then I woke up and was scared to death because it was empty (my mind). I had actually contacted outerspace, and it was full of gonzos. oh no, that wasn't my dream, that was the muppet movie... sorry for wasting the bandwidth with dribble.
Thanks, and Keep on crunchin'
John Henry KI4JPL
Sevierville TN

I started with nothing,
and I still have some of it left.
<img src="http://www.boincstats.com/stats/banner.php?cpid=989478996ebd8eadba8f0809051cdde2">
ID: 159981 · Report as offensive
1mp0£173
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 8423
Credit: 356,897
RAC: 0
United States
Message 160008 - Posted: 30 Aug 2005, 17:34:52 UTC - in response to Message 159981.  

I use to do seti in my own mind, but then I woke up and was scared to death because it was empty (my mind). I had actually contacted outerspace, and it was full of gonzos. oh no, that wasn't my dream, that was the muppet movie... sorry for wasting the bandwidth with dribble.

For me, it's always Grover.
ID: 160008 · Report as offensive
Guillaume

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 00
Posts: 8
Credit: 4,480,550
RAC: 0
France
Message 160019 - Posted: 30 Aug 2005, 17:41:56 UTC - in response to Message 159954.  

My first ever SETI classic machine was a 75mhz P1 with 16MB ram and Win95. I then upgraded the CPU to a 133mhz... zooom!


My 'smallest system' for Seti was a P133 Laptop with Windows 95.
I also ran it for a while on and HP 712/60 and a few 712/100.
Since then I've graduated to better CPU ( 2 Pentium M, 1 Celeron and 1 PIII )
and I'm considering running boinc on several servers I have sitting idle once they have access to the net. ( right now they stand on a 'standalone network' )
I wonder what are the performances of two HP K570 and a bunch of Netra 20 crunching work units.

ID: 160019 · Report as offensive
N/A
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 01
Posts: 3718
Credit: 93,649
RAC: 0
Message 160098 - Posted: 30 Aug 2005, 19:40:42 UTC - in response to Message 159956.  
Last modified: 30 Aug 2005, 19:48:40 UTC

What about running Boinc/Seti on a Mobile Phone whith Windows CE? Anybody tried it?

[font='courier,courier new']If you can get (me) a copy of MS's Dev kit, I've got an extended LiIon battery and a 1GB of storage space.

The hard part will be the RAM: I've got 56MB, and IIRC BOINC needs more. Anyone wanna reverse-engineer swap pages for WinCE?

And since we're on the topic, if anyone has some 30-pin, 100ns or faster SIMMs for a Mac IIcx running A/UX 3.0.1... IIRC it clocks in at 3MIPS. Four, same-size sticks per bank, two banks total, so no loosies.[/font]
ID: 160098 · Report as offensive
Profile barbarossa
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Sep 99
Posts: 1294
Credit: 6,629,998
RAC: 3
Switzerland
Message 160133 - Posted: 30 Aug 2005, 20:17:47 UTC

Back in 99 I had a 486-50MHz machine I used as a file server. As it was running 24/7 I had it crunching Seti. Took something like a week for one WU - between 130 and 160 hrs. My fastest comp at that time (a Cyrix @ 200MHz) still took about 20 hrs/WU.

:-)= Greybeard
All about BOINC: BOINC-Wiki (by Paul D. Buck)

ID: 160133 · Report as offensive
Joseph Keene

Send message
Joined: 19 Feb 01
Posts: 15
Credit: 2,362,029
RAC: 0
United States
Message 160141 - Posted: 30 Aug 2005, 20:36:43 UTC

I have a P166 and a P200 running classic still. I wanted to get my classic total over 1000 WU's so I set them to it. The 166MHz will have 96MB of ram in a couple days, and the 200MHz now has 265MB. As soon as I get the hard drives that I ordered in, darn Katrina, they'll have enough disk space to install BOINC and attach to SETI and CPDN. They are both running Win2k, and the 200 is my internet server....I have the lowly dial-up. :-\
ID: 160141 · Report as offensive
Bradshawma

Send message
Joined: 17 Mar 04
Posts: 20
Credit: 2,362,303
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 160143 - Posted: 30 Aug 2005, 20:40:09 UTC

I have a 16mhz 386 motherboard in my attic. I could dig it out but I doubt it would complete a WU before the 14 day deadline.
ID: 160143 · Report as offensive
Profile Pooh Bear 27
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Jul 03
Posts: 3224
Credit: 4,603,826
RAC: 0
United States
Message 160145 - Posted: 30 Aug 2005, 20:41:52 UTC - in response to Message 160141.  

I have a P166 and a P200 running classic still. I wanted to get my classic total over 1000 WU's so I set them to it. The 166MHz will have 96MB of ram in a couple days, and the 200MHz now has 265MB. As soon as I get the hard drives that I ordered in, darn Katrina, they'll have enough disk space to install BOINC and attach to SETI and CPDN. They are both running Win2k, and the 200 is my internet server....I have the lowly dial-up. :-


CPDN wishes a minimum of 800MHz, otherwise you may not finish WUs in time, plus might not be robust enough to run the latest application, as even my P4 2.8G HT has some issues with it (hoping for a better application next one that downlods).



My movie https://vimeo.com/manage/videos/502242
ID: 160145 · Report as offensive
Profile Martin A. Boegelund
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 00
Posts: 292
Credit: 387,485
RAC: 1
Denmark
Message 160152 - Posted: 30 Aug 2005, 20:46:57 UTC - in response to Message 160143.  

I have a 16mhz 386 motherboard in my attic. I could dig it out but I doubt it would complete a WU before the 14 day deadline.


If you du that, I will say Ni!

"Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?"

ID: 160152 · Report as offensive
1 · 2 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Smallest hardware used for SETI crunching


 
©2025 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.