Message boards :
Number crunching :
Daily WU Quota?
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
rattelschneck Send message Joined: 14 Apr 01 Posts: 435 Credit: 842,179 RAC: 0 |
Could somebody please have a look at this host 792074 I thought there is a daily WU quota of 100? Counting the wu this host has downloaded today, I'm at 140! Any thoughts? |
Don Erway Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 305 Credit: 471,946 RAC: 0 |
I suspect a quota of 100, may mean "no limit". What did you do to download so many at once? Push your buffer setting up to a bunch of days? |
rattelschneck Send message Joined: 14 Apr 01 Posts: 435 Credit: 842,179 RAC: 0 |
I suspect a quota of 100, may mean "no limit". It isn't one of mine, found this host accidently by looking up a pending wu. |
rattelschneck Send message Joined: 14 Apr 01 Posts: 435 Credit: 842,179 RAC: 0 |
Errr, my bad. 100/day per CPU But this hosts looks odd anyway. It will never return these lots of wu in time. I'm counting 1415 "new" wu so far. |
Brian Oliver Send message Joined: 25 May 99 Posts: 50 Credit: 910,871 RAC: 0 |
well if it is 100 WU per CPU (up to 4 CPU's) per day ... that calculates out to 3.5 days of work. Assumeing time to complete is still throwing out erronious times that means that the cache or days of work amount is most likely set to 10 days. Errr, my bad. 100/day per CPU Wiki de BOINC <img src="http://www.boincstats.com/stats/banner.php?cpid=51a3eaaef8df276544f56140a8a65413"> |
Dorsai Send message Joined: 7 Sep 04 Posts: 474 Credit: 4,504,838 RAC: 0 |
I also make it 1415 WU's to do. I also see the Hosts time to finish a Wu is just under 11,000 seconds, 3 (ish) hours. 1415 @ 3 hours is 4245 hours, or 176 days. If it's a dual CPU PC with HT, that's still 44 days till the most recent DLed WU is done. Perhaps someone with better math skills than meneeds to have a look at it, and explain how it will report in time, as I can't get it to come out with the PC getting the work back in time. Have we found an "orphan file creator"? Foamy is "Lord and Master". (Oh, + some Classic WUs too.) |
N/A Send message Joined: 18 May 01 Posts: 3718 Credit: 93,649 RAC: 0 |
[font='courier,courier new']IIRC someone said that the max WU/day is based on the average crunch time over the user's crunching history. Faster processors would allow the user's limit to be raised as time goes by. Then again, it's 2AM here, it's been a looooong day in the city, and I'm about to zonk out, so my memory is kinda shot.[/font] |
Keck_Komputers Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 1575 Credit: 4,152,111 RAC: 1 |
The max on this project is 100 per CPU. Any error result reduces that number by 1. A sucessful result doubles the host's quota until it hits the project max. ps. sorry about the sig...it should shorten itself in a couple of days. BOINC WIKI BOINCing since 2002/12/8 |
MJKelleher Send message Joined: 1 Jul 99 Posts: 2048 Credit: 1,575,401 RAC: 0 |
[font='courier,courier new']IIRC someone said that the max WU/day is based on the average crunch time over the user's crunching history. Faster processors would allow the user's limit to be raised as time goes by. That unit is within the 100/cpu/day. I counted 200 downloaded on the 20th, 200 on the 19th, etc. How and whether it'll return them on time and validatable is another question entirely. MJ |
N/A Send message Joined: 18 May 01 Posts: 3718 Credit: 93,649 RAC: 0 |
[font='courier,courier new']I thought that RAC and the WU/day cap were related. 'Ya learn somethin' new every day - Thanks![/font] |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.