Message boards :
Number crunching :
why is my claimed credit so high
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
cliff west Send message Joined: 7 May 01 Posts: 211 Credit: 16,180,728 RAC: 15 |
i have a computer that all it does is SETI, now my account info says that I did a packet of 14,081 and claimed 46.07 but end credit was 17.79. Now my q is why is my computer claiming so hight a credit? |
Gary Roberts Send message Joined: 31 Oct 99 Posts: 95 Credit: 2,301,228 RAC: 0 |
I found the result you were referring to and there are two reasons:- 1. You are running version 4.19 of Boinc which is well known to overclaim. 2. All the other members of your quorum were running multi-CPU boxes and these seem to seriously underclaim (look particularly at the 4cpu Xeon which claimed less than 5). At the end of the day you got a bit less than fair, which would be more in the 20 - 25 range. Cheers, Gary. |
Jim Baize Send message Joined: 6 May 00 Posts: 758 Credit: 149,536 RAC: 0 |
I think you might find this link to the WIKI helpful http://boinc-doc.net/boinc-wiki/index.php?title=Computation_of_Credit |
cliff west Send message Joined: 7 May 01 Posts: 211 Credit: 16,180,728 RAC: 15 |
Thank you for the link but it still does not explane the differance between 46 and 17, i'm running a 2x MP2100 with a weak vid card. i'm not a computer smart person to start with.. any help would be great |
The Gom Jabbar Send message Joined: 9 Jan 01 Posts: 1 Credit: 130,594 RAC: 0 |
Cliff - what your computer claims is seldom what it actually is awarded. The other computers crunching help determine the awarded credit. As I recall, they toss the high and low numbers and average the two remaining numbers. If you're overclaiming, as asserted by an earlier poster, then your wu may well be the high getting tossed. Either way, you're getting an "average" of the four numbers being submitted. |
W-K 666 Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19048 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 |
Thank you for the link but it still does not explane the differance between 46 and 17, i'm running a 2x MP2100 with a weak vid card. i'm not a computer smart person to start with.. any help would be great Hi Cliff A few things
|
Kajunfisher Send message Joined: 29 Mar 05 Posts: 1407 Credit: 126,476 RAC: 0 |
BOINC 4.19 claimed more credit based on the benchmark scores. That was fixed in 4.45 (maybe earlier, I forget). The optimized clients sometimes claim more credit also (as mine does). Some optimized clients claim less credit. It varies because of the way that the client was compiled. I don't normally get what I claim. I usually get less. Benchmark scores vary because of different client version, cpu types (& speeds), L2 cache, RAM, motherboards... there's some of it, but hopefully you get my drift here. A standard 4.45 client (for example) may claim 10 A optimized 4.45 client (for example) may claim 7 or 20 If I missed something here someone will correct me or better explain this. I hope that this helps you. :-) No matter where you go, there you are... |
Misfit Send message Joined: 21 Jun 01 Posts: 21804 Credit: 2,815,091 RAC: 0 |
Because of optimized clients credits should be based on the mean and not the median. |
Mibe, ZX-81 16kb Send message Joined: 30 Jun 99 Posts: 42 Credit: 2,622,033 RAC: 0 |
Nah, that would take away one of the reasons for having a quorum. A faker claiming 10000 credits would get 3333+ credits awarded. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.