lost credit/time

Message boards : Number crunching : lost credit/time
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Miklos M.

Send message
Joined: 5 May 99
Posts: 955
Credit: 136,115,648
RAC: 73
Hungary
Message 145684 - Posted: 1 Aug 2005, 16:58:52 UTC

I wonder if there is a way that if you have an older/slower computer you could get units that other slower/older computers are getting. Seems like my older one is taking 5 hours to do a unit and is hardly ever getting the amount of credit requested.

Nick
ID: 145684 · Report as offensive
Profile Fivestar Crashtest
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 10 Dec 99
Posts: 226
Credit: 5,377,978
RAC: 0
United States
Message 145695 - Posted: 1 Aug 2005, 17:13:03 UTC - in response to Message 145684.  

I wonder if there is a way that if you have an older/slower computer you could get units that other slower/older computers are getting. Seems like my older one is taking 5 hours to do a unit and is hardly ever getting the amount of credit requested.

Nick


My Pentium III 500 MHz takes way longer to do a work unit but never asks for that much credit. I am using the optimized client and application for Linux, though. This might be the fault of the Celeron.

Maybe you could use the generic optimized client here.

http://www.pperry.f2s.com/downloads.htm

Instructions for installing it are in the BOINC Wiki.

http://tinyurl.com/b4f22

Happy crunching,

Pam
ID: 145695 · Report as offensive
Miklos M.

Send message
Joined: 5 May 99
Posts: 955
Credit: 136,115,648
RAC: 73
Hungary
Message 145714 - Posted: 1 Aug 2005, 17:38:30 UTC - in response to Message 145695.  

I wonder if there is a way that if you have an older/slower computer you could get units that other slower/older computers are getting. Seems like my older one is taking 5 hours to do a unit and is hardly ever getting the amount of credit requested.

Nick


My Pentium III 500 MHz takes way longer to do a work unit but never asks for that much credit. I am using the optimized client and application for Linux, though. This might be the fault of the Celeron.

Maybe you could use the generic optimized client here.

http://www.pperry.f2s.com/downloads.htm

Instructions for installing it are in the BOINC Wiki.

http://tinyurl.com/b4f22

Happy crunching,

Pam


ID: 145714 · Report as offensive
Miklos M.

Send message
Joined: 5 May 99
Posts: 955
Credit: 136,115,648
RAC: 73
Hungary
Message 145715 - Posted: 1 Aug 2005, 17:39:13 UTC - in response to Message 145695.  

I wonder if there is a way that if you have an older/slower computer you could get units that other slower/older computers are getting. Seems like my older one is taking 5 hours to do a unit and is hardly ever getting the amount of credit requested.

Nick


My Pentium III 500 MHz takes way longer to do a work unit but never asks for that much credit. I am using the optimized client and application for Linux, though. This might be the fault of the Celeron.

Maybe you could use the generic optimized client here.

http://www.pperry.f2s.com/downloads.htm

Instructions for installing it are in the BOINC Wiki.

http://tinyurl.com/b4f22

Happy crunching,

Pam


Thanks, I will give that a shot.

Nick

ID: 145715 · Report as offensive
DecBassI
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 May 05
Posts: 152
Credit: 86,905
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 145752 - Posted: 1 Aug 2005, 19:31:33 UTC
Last modified: 1 Aug 2005, 19:35:13 UTC

I also run an older machine, (P4 1500, takes 5-6 hrs per wu) but my credits are usually close to the claimed credit, no matter what the other "crunchers" are. Some are slightly lower than my claimed credit, but on average, my "box" seems to always be around the "middle ground"

Dec

could this be a benchmark issue? (I'm no expert...)
ID: 145752 · Report as offensive
Astro
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Apr 02
Posts: 8026
Credit: 600,015
RAC: 0
Message 145779 - Posted: 1 Aug 2005, 20:14:07 UTC - in response to Message 145752.  

I also run an older machine, (P4 1500, takes 5-6 hrs per wu) but my credits are usually close to the claimed credit, no matter what the other "crunchers" are. Some are slightly lower than my claimed credit, but on average, my "box" seems to always be around the "middle ground"

Dec

could this be a benchmark issue? (I'm no expert...)

That's because you have a machine which is closer to average than my P3 500 which claims alot or my AMD athlon64 3700 which claims little, and my P4 1.8 which also is about average.
ID: 145779 · Report as offensive
Profile Kajunfisher
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Mar 05
Posts: 1407
Credit: 126,476
RAC: 0
United States
Message 145781 - Posted: 1 Aug 2005, 20:19:05 UTC - in response to Message 145752.  

I also run an older machine, (P4 1500, takes 5-6 hrs per wu) but my credits are usually close to the claimed credit, no matter what the other "crunchers" are. Some are slightly lower than my claimed credit, but on average, my "box" seems to always be around the "middle ground"

Dec

could this be a benchmark issue? (I'm no expert...)


Some of TMR's optimized clients will request more credit, others will request about the same amount of credit, but crunch the wu faster...

Part of it is the benchmark, but also in the instuction set used or the way in which the optimized client was compiled.

ID: 145781 · Report as offensive
Profile [B@H] Ray
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Sep 00
Posts: 485
Credit: 45,275
RAC: 0
United States
Message 145787 - Posted: 1 Aug 2005, 20:29:05 UTC - in response to Message 145695.  
Last modified: 1 Aug 2005, 20:32:25 UTC

My Pentium III 500 MHz takes way longer to do a work unit but never asks for that much credit. I am using the optimized client and application for Linux, though. This might be the fault of the Celeron.

Maybe you could use the generic optimized client here.

http://www.pperry.f2s.com/downloads.htm

Instructions for installing it are in the BOINC Wiki.

http://tinyurl.com/b4f22

Happy crunching,

Pam


If you have a spair P3 hanging around I could use it to have a 2nd system running. My P1 133 is just to slow, about 90 hours on classic, not enoughf memory for BOINC, to old to invest in memory.

But my P4 2.4 is happely crunching away.

If anyone needs a system I have an old XT Clone (8088 processor 4.77 MH) with a whopping 64K ram. All ready for someone to pick up. Has DOS 6.2 loaded on a gigantic 65 Meg hard drive. (was very large 20 years ago)

Ray


Pizza@Home Rays Place Rays place Forums
ID: 145787 · Report as offensive
DecBassI
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 May 05
Posts: 152
Credit: 86,905
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 145795 - Posted: 1 Aug 2005, 20:46:52 UTC - in response to Message 145787.  

My Pentium III 500 MHz takes way longer to do a work unit but never asks for that much credit. I am using the optimized client and application for Linux, though. This might be the fault of the Celeron.

Maybe you could use the generic optimized client here.

http://www.pperry.f2s.com/downloads.htm

Instructions for installing it are in the BOINC Wiki.

http://tinyurl.com/b4f22

Happy crunching,

Pam


If you have a spair P3 hanging around I could use it to have a 2nd system running. My P1 133 is just to slow, about 90 hours on classic, not enoughf memory for BOINC, to old to invest in memory.

But my P4 2.4 is happely crunching away.

If anyone needs a system I have an old XT Clone (8088 processor 4.77 MH) with a whopping 64K ram. All ready for someone to pick up. Has DOS 6.2 loaded on a gigantic 65 Meg hard drive. (was very large 20 years ago)

Ray


I have an Apricot F1 8086 (no hard drive, 4.something MHz) IBM Incompatible. Runs on DOS 3.2.
No good for BOINC?

ID: 145795 · Report as offensive
KB7RZF
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Aug 99
Posts: 9549
Credit: 3,308,926
RAC: 2
United States
Message 145836 - Posted: 1 Aug 2005, 22:27:45 UTC - in response to Message 145795.  

My Pentium III 500 MHz takes way longer to do a work unit but never asks for that much credit. I am using the optimized client and application for Linux, though. This might be the fault of the Celeron.

Maybe you could use the generic optimized client here.

http://www.pperry.f2s.com/downloads.htm

Instructions for installing it are in the BOINC Wiki.

http://tinyurl.com/b4f22

Happy crunching,

Pam


If you have a spair P3 hanging around I could use it to have a 2nd system running. My P1 133 is just to slow, about 90 hours on classic, not enoughf memory for BOINC, to old to invest in memory.

But my P4 2.4 is happely crunching away.

If anyone needs a system I have an old XT Clone (8088 processor 4.77 MH) with a whopping 64K ram. All ready for someone to pick up. Has DOS 6.2 loaded on a gigantic 65 Meg hard drive. (was very large 20 years ago)

Ray


I have an Apricot F1 8086 (no hard drive, 4.something MHz) IBM Incompatible. Runs on DOS 3.2.
No good for BOINC?


I got an old commodor 64 laying around somewhere, no hard drive, has a 5.25 inch disk drive, no memory at all, dunno what mhz it runs. :-) Doubt it will run BOINC though. :-)

ID: 145836 · Report as offensive
Profile Kajunfisher
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Mar 05
Posts: 1407
Credit: 126,476
RAC: 0
United States
Message 145853 - Posted: 1 Aug 2005, 22:54:15 UTC - in response to Message 145836.  

I got an old commodor 64 laying around somewhere, no hard drive, has a 5.25 inch disk drive, no memory at all, dunno what mhz it runs. :-) Doubt it will run BOINC though. :-)


As a good friend told me recently about a couple of Pentium S 166Mhz 'puters (1 is a dual processor) I have, they'd make good boat anchors. I personally would hold on to them for nostalgic value, something to show the kids, or grandkids later...your call... but it will not run BOINC, sorry :-(


ID: 145853 · Report as offensive
Profile Steve Cressman
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Jun 02
Posts: 583
Credit: 65,644
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 146200 - Posted: 2 Aug 2005, 20:28:04 UTC

I got an old portable, Osborn. No harddrive 2 x 5.25 floppy 2.5 inch scrolling mono screen. It weighed so much I did not lug it around too often. What a differance 20 years makes. Used to have fun playing text based Dungeons and Dragons on it. LoL :)

98SE XP2500+ @ 2.1 GHz Boinc v5.8.8

And God said"Let there be light."But then the program crashed because he was trying to access the 'light' property of a NULL universe pointer.
ID: 146200 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : lost credit/time


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.