Message boards :
Number crunching :
lost credit/time
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Miklos M. Send message Joined: 5 May 99 Posts: 955 Credit: 136,115,648 RAC: 73 |
I wonder if there is a way that if you have an older/slower computer you could get units that other slower/older computers are getting. Seems like my older one is taking 5 hours to do a unit and is hardly ever getting the amount of credit requested. Nick |
Fivestar Crashtest Send message Joined: 10 Dec 99 Posts: 226 Credit: 5,377,978 RAC: 0 |
I wonder if there is a way that if you have an older/slower computer you could get units that other slower/older computers are getting. Seems like my older one is taking 5 hours to do a unit and is hardly ever getting the amount of credit requested. My Pentium III 500 MHz takes way longer to do a work unit but never asks for that much credit. I am using the optimized client and application for Linux, though. This might be the fault of the Celeron. Maybe you could use the generic optimized client here. http://www.pperry.f2s.com/downloads.htm Instructions for installing it are in the BOINC Wiki. http://tinyurl.com/b4f22 Happy crunching, Pam |
Miklos M. Send message Joined: 5 May 99 Posts: 955 Credit: 136,115,648 RAC: 73 |
I wonder if there is a way that if you have an older/slower computer you could get units that other slower/older computers are getting. Seems like my older one is taking 5 hours to do a unit and is hardly ever getting the amount of credit requested. |
Miklos M. Send message Joined: 5 May 99 Posts: 955 Credit: 136,115,648 RAC: 73 |
I wonder if there is a way that if you have an older/slower computer you could get units that other slower/older computers are getting. Seems like my older one is taking 5 hours to do a unit and is hardly ever getting the amount of credit requested. Thanks, I will give that a shot. Nick |
DecBassI Send message Joined: 21 May 05 Posts: 152 Credit: 86,905 RAC: 0 |
I also run an older machine, (P4 1500, takes 5-6 hrs per wu) but my credits are usually close to the claimed credit, no matter what the other "crunchers" are. Some are slightly lower than my claimed credit, but on average, my "box" seems to always be around the "middle ground" Dec could this be a benchmark issue? (I'm no expert...) |
Astro Send message Joined: 16 Apr 02 Posts: 8026 Credit: 600,015 RAC: 0 |
I also run an older machine, (P4 1500, takes 5-6 hrs per wu) but my credits are usually close to the claimed credit, no matter what the other "crunchers" are. Some are slightly lower than my claimed credit, but on average, my "box" seems to always be around the "middle ground" That's because you have a machine which is closer to average than my P3 500 which claims alot or my AMD athlon64 3700 which claims little, and my P4 1.8 which also is about average. |
Kajunfisher Send message Joined: 29 Mar 05 Posts: 1407 Credit: 126,476 RAC: 0 |
I also run an older machine, (P4 1500, takes 5-6 hrs per wu) but my credits are usually close to the claimed credit, no matter what the other "crunchers" are. Some are slightly lower than my claimed credit, but on average, my "box" seems to always be around the "middle ground" Some of TMR's optimized clients will request more credit, others will request about the same amount of credit, but crunch the wu faster... Part of it is the benchmark, but also in the instuction set used or the way in which the optimized client was compiled. |
[B@H] Ray Send message Joined: 1 Sep 00 Posts: 485 Credit: 45,275 RAC: 0 |
My Pentium III 500 MHz takes way longer to do a work unit but never asks for that much credit. I am using the optimized client and application for Linux, though. This might be the fault of the Celeron. If you have a spair P3 hanging around I could use it to have a 2nd system running. My P1 133 is just to slow, about 90 hours on classic, not enoughf memory for BOINC, to old to invest in memory. But my P4 2.4 is happely crunching away. If anyone needs a system I have an old XT Clone (8088 processor 4.77 MH) with a whopping 64K ram. All ready for someone to pick up. Has DOS 6.2 loaded on a gigantic 65 Meg hard drive. (was very large 20 years ago) Ray Pizza@Home Rays Place Rays place Forums |
DecBassI Send message Joined: 21 May 05 Posts: 152 Credit: 86,905 RAC: 0 |
My Pentium III 500 MHz takes way longer to do a work unit but never asks for that much credit. I am using the optimized client and application for Linux, though. This might be the fault of the Celeron. I have an Apricot F1 8086 (no hard drive, 4.something MHz) IBM Incompatible. Runs on DOS 3.2. No good for BOINC? |
KB7RZF Send message Joined: 15 Aug 99 Posts: 9549 Credit: 3,308,926 RAC: 2 |
My Pentium III 500 MHz takes way longer to do a work unit but never asks for that much credit. I am using the optimized client and application for Linux, though. This might be the fault of the Celeron. I got an old commodor 64 laying around somewhere, no hard drive, has a 5.25 inch disk drive, no memory at all, dunno what mhz it runs. :-) Doubt it will run BOINC though. :-) |
Kajunfisher Send message Joined: 29 Mar 05 Posts: 1407 Credit: 126,476 RAC: 0 |
I got an old commodor 64 laying around somewhere, no hard drive, has a 5.25 inch disk drive, no memory at all, dunno what mhz it runs. :-) Doubt it will run BOINC though. :-) As a good friend told me recently about a couple of Pentium S 166Mhz 'puters (1 is a dual processor) I have, they'd make good boat anchors. I personally would hold on to them for nostalgic value, something to show the kids, or grandkids later...your call... but it will not run BOINC, sorry :-( |
Steve Cressman Send message Joined: 6 Jun 02 Posts: 583 Credit: 65,644 RAC: 0 |
I got an old portable, Osborn. No harddrive 2 x 5.25 floppy 2.5 inch scrolling mono screen. It weighed so much I did not lug it around too often. What a differance 20 years makes. Used to have fun playing text based Dungeons and Dragons on it. LoL :) 98SE XP2500+ @ 2.1 GHz Boinc v5.8.8 And God said"Let there be light."But then the program crashed because he was trying to access the 'light' property of a NULL universe pointer. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.