[POLL] Linux (unix) vs winblows (M$)

Message boards : Number crunching : [POLL] Linux (unix) vs winblows (M$)
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile VK5FSCK
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Jun 02
Posts: 61
Credit: 342,840
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 141583 - Posted: 23 Jul 2005, 19:51:27 UTC

Hi All BOINC'ers

Maybe this has been done b4, but how many of you are you computing data under linux for SETI@home ?

I have 2 computers at the moment computing data for SETI@home, till i get my server backup online (HDD Failed) will then have 3 again.

Linux Rocks
Cheers Quail
ID: 141583 · Report as offensive
Profile Tigher
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 Mar 04
Posts: 1547
Credit: 760,577
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 141589 - Posted: 23 Jul 2005, 20:00:55 UTC

I am .....FC3 here. With the optimised client from TMR and my own optimised boinc cc its as good as Win platforms I use. So...I use both mainly win but I like my FC3 setuo a lot. Without an optimised client though....Win is the winner for sure.

ID: 141589 · Report as offensive
Andre Heinrichs
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 6 Oct 00
Posts: 17
Credit: 493,468
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 141603 - Posted: 23 Jul 2005, 20:34:17 UTC - in response to Message 141583.  

Hi All BOINC'ers

Maybe this has been done b4, but how many of you are you computing data under linux for SETI@home ?


I have a total of 4 PCs here, two are running Linux (Suse 9.3, my 'main' computer, and Debian, my 'Server').

The other two are laptops running Winblows. One of them runs only CPDN because of an error in the LAN-connection...

Greetings from Germany
ID: 141603 · Report as offensive
Scarecrow

Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 00
Posts: 4520
Credit: 486,601
RAC: 0
United States
Message 141639 - Posted: 23 Jul 2005, 22:19:16 UTC - in response to Message 141583.  

6 Linux machines here, 5 Debian, 1 RedHat. Seti running on one of the Debian boxes.




ID: 141639 · Report as offensive
Profile Raymon Purgason

Send message
Joined: 24 Oct 03
Posts: 27
Credit: 14,251,492
RAC: 0
United States
Message 141643 - Posted: 23 Jul 2005, 22:33:02 UTC

Hello all, I have 2 xp, 3 xp-pro,1 win 98, and 3 fedora boxes all running boinc, What I like most about fedora was the price-free, It allowed me to set up 3 addional crunchers. Keep on crunchin every one.
ID: 141643 · Report as offensive
Pascal, K G
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 2343
Credit: 150,491
RAC: 0
United States
Message 141645 - Posted: 23 Jul 2005, 22:44:40 UTC

4 winblows XP sOON to be Vista
Semper Eadem
So long Paul, it has been a hell of a ride.

Park your ego's, fire up the computers, Science YES, Credits No.
ID: 141645 · Report as offensive
Profile Everette Dobbins

Send message
Joined: 13 Jan 00
Posts: 291
Credit: 22,594,655
RAC: 0
United States
Message 141650 - Posted: 23 Jul 2005, 22:59:40 UTC - in response to Message 141583.  

Hi All BOINC'ers

Maybe this has been done b4, but how many of you are you computing data under linux for SETI@home ?

I have 2 computers at the moment computing data for SETI@home, till i get my server backup online (HDD Failed) will then have 3 again.

Linux Rocks

>
>
I am new to linux but have 1 Computer running SimplyMepis 3.3.1 which is real simple Linux OS. Still Zip files have to be gunzipped and once seti@home folder is created I have to CD to the folder and ./boinc_4.19* every time I start client. Client has to run in terminal console so for me it is still a chore. I wish it were more automated. Once started it always runs I have never seen an error running seti@home on this linux OS and is very stable.
ID: 141650 · Report as offensive
TPR_Mojo
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 Apr 00
Posts: 323
Credit: 7,001,052
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 141692 - Posted: 24 Jul 2005, 1:32:01 UTC
Last modified: 24 Jul 2005, 1:32:56 UTC

10 machines Fedora Core 2 to 4
12 diskless workstations kernel 2.4.24 or 2.4.26
2 Windoze

Go figure :)
ID: 141692 · Report as offensive
Profile keeleysam
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Dec 03
Posts: 133
Credit: 60,478,373
RAC: 0
United States
Message 141701 - Posted: 24 Jul 2005, 1:53:59 UTC

I like Fedora Core 3 and 4, but since the optimized clients are so much faster for windows, and services are easy to setup there, I use XP for my crunchers.
ID: 141701 · Report as offensive
Dick M.

Send message
Joined: 26 Jan 00
Posts: 11
Credit: 342,735
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 141716 - Posted: 24 Jul 2005, 2:39:22 UTC
Last modified: 24 Jul 2005, 2:40:22 UTC

I'm dual booting for now, until I get a new PC in september. My dual boot conf is WinXP Pro / Mandrake 10.1

I just install Linux yesterday and start to crunch today. I'll keep running for a few days to see how it goes with the penguin... I didn't run a Linux box for about 2 years now.
ID: 141716 · Report as offensive
Profile Neil Walker
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 May 99
Posts: 288
Credit: 18,101,056
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 141750 - Posted: 24 Jul 2005, 4:11:54 UTC

Currently 6 Gentoo GNU/Linux machines here. One dual boots Windows XP but I very rarely use that - especially as, for me, Linux crunches SETI much faster. Optimised clients all round.


Be lucky

Neil



ID: 141750 · Report as offensive
Profile Gonad the Destroyer®©™
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Aug 99
Posts: 204
Credit: 12,463,705
RAC: 0
United States
Message 141758 - Posted: 24 Jul 2005, 4:37:43 UTC

2 Mandrake, 1 XPee, 1 98SE, and 1 98.


ID: 141758 · Report as offensive
N/A
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 01
Posts: 3718
Credit: 93,649
RAC: 0
Message 141768 - Posted: 24 Jul 2005, 5:25:16 UTC - in response to Message 141583.  

[font='courier,courier new']Hmm... I've got Mac OS 9, Mac OS X, Darwin 8, & Yellow Dog 4.0.1 on one machine (It'd be FC4/PPC or Kubuntu if it weren't for massive video problems); Mac OS 7.6.1, BeOS 5.0.3, & Yellow Dog 3.0.1 on another; System 6.0.8, A/UX 3.0.1, & Debian/68k on yet another; and Win2K & Damn Small Linux on VirtualPC.

But, yeah - Linux all the way. :-)[/font]
ID: 141768 · Report as offensive
Profile ksnash

Send message
Joined: 28 Nov 99
Posts: 402
Credit: 528,725
RAC: 0
United States
Message 141785 - Posted: 24 Jul 2005, 6:17:14 UTC - in response to Message 141645.  

4 winblows XP sOON to be Vista

In about two years.....
ID: 141785 · Report as offensive
Ned Slider

Send message
Joined: 12 Oct 01
Posts: 668
Credit: 4,375,315
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 141821 - Posted: 24 Jul 2005, 8:11:54 UTC - in response to Message 141701.  

I like Fedora Core 3 and 4, but since the optimized clients are so much faster for windows, and services are easy to setup there, I use XP for my crunchers.


Mmmm... that's not what I'm seeing on my dual boot systems.

My AMD Athlon XP systems are all about 15-20 mins faster using Linux than Windows (optimized clients on both).

Metod's data shows an Intel P4 system to be virtually identical under linux or windows.

Services are extremely easy to setup under linux (FC) IMHO. Menu > System Settings > Services with an on/off tickbox for each service. What could be easier?

I have 3 Linux boxes crunching BOINC atm, and had about 6 SGi IRIX dual processor servers crunching on old seti classic before I switched.

Ned

*** My Guide to Compiling Optimised BOINC and SETI Clients ***
*** Download Optimised BOINC and SETI Clients for Linux Here ***
ID: 141821 · Report as offensive
Chris Bosshard

Send message
Joined: 5 Jun 99
Posts: 86
Credit: 3,474,583
RAC: 0
Switzerland
Message 141848 - Posted: 24 Jul 2005, 10:37:20 UTC

Here is my setup...

5x Fedora Core 3+4
4x OsX 10.3.9 + 10.4.2
2x Win XP
3x Win 2k

Fastest Crunchers are with no doubt the Linux boxes with optimized clients.
The difference between the optimized Win clients and the optimized Linux clients is small, but Linux is still a few minutes faster.


Chris Bosshard
Visit my homepage
astroinfo SETI page
ID: 141848 · Report as offensive
Profile RPMurphy
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Jun 00
Posts: 131
Credit: 622,641
RAC: 0
United States
Message 141862 - Posted: 24 Jul 2005, 11:36:33 UTC

1 x FC3
4 x WinXP

Right now my FC3 box is off line due to heat problems.
Have a new 80mm fan on order for it. Soon will be back
on line and slowly crunching.
It is a sad sad day when someone takes your spoon away from you...
ID: 141862 · Report as offensive
ampoliros
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Sep 99
Posts: 152
Credit: 3,542,579
RAC: 5
United States
Message 142560 - Posted: 25 Jul 2005, 15:37:30 UTC

2 Mandrake
1 "Other" Linux
2 Win XP Pro
2 Win 2000 Pro

One of the Win2K machines will probably turn to "Other" Linux in a month or two.

7,049 S@H Classic Credits
ID: 142560 · Report as offensive
Profile VK5FSCK
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Jun 02
Posts: 61
Credit: 342,840
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 142586 - Posted: 25 Jul 2005, 16:22:38 UTC

WOW

It is surprising the amout of people there is running Linux (unix) to run BOINC.

I don't run any optermized BOINC or SETI@home clients under Linux, cause I have tryed to compile my own but it has stuffed up on me :-(

Rgds

PS in the immortal words of Albert Einstein
"The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of
thinking we were at when we created them"

Cheers Quail
ID: 142586 · Report as offensive
Profile rattelschneck
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Apr 01
Posts: 435
Credit: 842,179
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 142601 - Posted: 25 Jul 2005, 17:12:14 UTC


These are mine...

5 Debian 3.1
1 Knoppix 3.9
8 Clusterknoppix 3.6
1 Solaris 8
1 Win XP Pro

One of the Debian boxes is triple boot Debian/Gentoo/Win XP Pro but it runs Debian 99,5 % of the time.


ID: 142601 · Report as offensive
1 · 2 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : [POLL] Linux (unix) vs winblows (M$)


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.