Message boards :
Number crunching :
No work from Project
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Biffa Send message Joined: 27 Oct 99 Posts: 41 Credit: 22,750,323 RAC: 0 |
Seems like we are out of WU's folks: 21/07/2005 21:56:17|SETI@home|Sending request to scheduler: http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi 21/07/2005 21:56:18|SETI@home|Scheduler RPC to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded 21/07/2005 21:56:18|SETI@home|No work from project 21/07/2005 21:56:18|SETI@home|Deferring communication with project for 56 minutes and 19 seconds Had a lot of these tonight :( |
Scottatron Send message Joined: 15 Jul 03 Posts: 94 Credit: 220,389 RAC: 0 |
It seems that there are no tapes in the splitter queue......not a bad idea, it will give the validator etc some time to catch up! |
Astro Send message Joined: 16 Apr 02 Posts: 8026 Credit: 600,015 RAC: 0 |
you aren't alone. Matt Lebofsky says were taking them faster than they can make them for the moment. |
Matt Lebofsky Send message Joined: 1 Mar 99 Posts: 1444 Credit: 957,058 RAC: 0 |
A new tape is being read as I type (it take several hours). Once it is read a fifth splitter will begin digesting it. I can only read in 2 or 3 tapes a day. We used to have a stacker that held 9 tapes, but this broke, so it's all manual for now. Plus, we only have disk space for about 7 tapes at a time, so the "queue" will never really be that long. - Matt -- BOINC/SETI@home network/web/science/development person -- "Any idiot can have a good idea. What is hard is to do it." - Jeanne-Claude |
Astro Send message Joined: 16 Apr 02 Posts: 8026 Credit: 600,015 RAC: 0 |
I just got 4 WUs, yippee, I'm a lucky one. latest status report follows: Database status State Approximate #results Ready to send 6 In progress 981,641 Waiting for validation 384,937 Transitioner backlog 1 hour |
Joe K Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 80 Credit: 17,001 RAC: 0 |
[quote]I just got 4 WUs, yippee, I'm a lucky one. I just got 2 WU. It took 12 seconds round trip from allowing network access to throughput.Of course I got DSL.But this was fast.There were only 31 wu in Queue as of 2250 UTC. |
DecBassI Send message Joined: 21 May 05 Posts: 152 Credit: 86,905 RAC: 0 |
seems im getting no downloads now as well - opposite problem to last week! 22/07/2005 00:10:47|SETI@home|Sending scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi 22/07/2005 00:10:47|SETI@home|Requesting 21958 seconds of work, returning 0 results 22/07/2005 00:10:48|SETI@home|Scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded 22/07/2005 00:10:48|SETI@home|No work from project 22/07/2005 00:10:49|SETI@home|Deferring communication with project for 58 seconds 22/07/2005 00:11:49|SETI@home|Sending scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi 22/07/2005 00:11:49|SETI@home|Requesting 21855 seconds of work, returning 0 results 22/07/2005 00:11:50|SETI@home|Scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded 22/07/2005 00:11:50|SETI@home|No work from project 22/07/2005 00:11:51|SETI@home|Deferring communication with project for 58 seconds 22/07/2005 00:12:50|SETI@home|Sending scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi 22/07/2005 00:12:50|SETI@home|Requesting 21754 seconds of work, returning 0 results 22/07/2005 00:12:51|SETI@home|Scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded 22/07/2005 00:12:51|SETI@home|No work from project 22/07/2005 00:12:52|SETI@home|Deferring communication with project for 58 seconds 22/07/2005 00:13:51|SETI@home|Sending scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi 22/07/2005 00:13:51|SETI@home|Requesting 21651 seconds of work, returning 0 results 22/07/2005 00:13:52|SETI@home|Scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded 22/07/2005 00:13:52|SETI@home|No work from project 22/07/2005 00:13:54|SETI@home|Deferring communication with project for 1 minutes and 23 seconds 22/07/2005 00:15:17|SETI@home|Sending scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi 22/07/2005 00:15:17|SETI@home|Requesting 21509 seconds of work, returning 0 results 22/07/2005 00:15:18|SETI@home|Scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded 22/07/2005 00:15:18|SETI@home|No work from project 22/07/2005 00:15:19|SETI@home|Deferring communication with project for 1 minutes and 0 seconds 22/07/2005 00:16:20|SETI@home|Sending scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi 22/07/2005 00:16:20|SETI@home|Requesting 21408 seconds of work, returning 0 results 22/07/2005 00:16:21|SETI@home|Scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded 22/07/2005 00:16:22|SETI@home|Message from server: Not sending work - last RPC too recent: 64 sec 22/07/2005 00:16:22|SETI@home|No work from project 22/07/2005 00:16:23|SETI@home|Deferring communication with project for 10 minutes and 4 seconds 22/07/2005 00:26:29|SETI@home|Sending scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi 22/07/2005 00:26:29|SETI@home|Requesting 20434 seconds of work, returning 0 results 22/07/2005 00:26:30|SETI@home|Scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded 22/07/2005 00:26:30|SETI@home|No work from project 22/07/2005 00:26:31|SETI@home|Deferring communication with project for 27 minutes and 15 seconds well, if i run out, at least CPDN will get more time! |
PT Send message Joined: 19 May 99 Posts: 231 Credit: 902,910 RAC: 0 |
7/21/2005 2:42:52 PM|SETI@home|Started download of 08fe05ab.29550.26337.848566.208 7/21/2005 2:42:54 PM|SETI@home|Scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded 7/21/2005 2:42:58 PM|SETI@home|Finished download of 08fe05ab.29550.26337.848566.208 7/21/2005 2:42:58 PM|SETI@home|Throughput 60850 bytes/sec Happy Crunching Happy crunching |
Michael Cruz Send message Joined: 23 Jan 00 Posts: 35 Credit: 323,653,343 RAC: 30 |
you aren't alone. They're probably being chewed up as Client Download Errors by the people still using CC 4.13 :) Mike Seti Classic: 204,777 WU /113.636 Yrs |
Pooh Bear 27 Send message Joined: 14 Jul 03 Posts: 3224 Credit: 4,603,826 RAC: 0 |
It seems that several people are ignoring or dismissing what Matt had written about the WUs. Matt is a Berkeley developer and knows what he is talking about. Here it is again as he wrote it around 22:25UTC: A new tape is being read as I type (it take several hours). Once it is read a fifth splitter will begin digesting it. I can only read in 2 or 3 tapes a day. We used to have a stacker that held 9 tapes, but this broke, so it's all manual for now. Plus, we only have disk space for about 7 tapes at a time, so the "queue" will never really be that long. Now move along and allow the crunching to happen. My movie https://vimeo.com/manage/videos/502242 |
Paul D. Buck Send message Joined: 19 Jul 00 Posts: 3898 Credit: 1,158,042 RAC: 0 |
Ready to send ... 15 ... wow! Lowest I have ever seen it ... then again ... something in the rules said that there would be days like this, and we should join other projects ... but ... I digress ... |
Bruno G. Olsen & ESEA @ greenholt Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 875 Credit: 4,386,984 RAC: 0 |
|
Atomic Kitten Death March Send message Joined: 8 Oct 04 Posts: 153 Credit: 415,035 RAC: 0 |
thats why i get about 40 WU's to run stocked up incase something goes down. Join the team, SETI.USA We are growing and could use your help to overcome SETI.Germany...www.setiusa.net |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.