Maximum daily WU quota per CPU = 2/day on long running P4 HTs all of a sudden

Message boards : Number crunching : Maximum daily WU quota per CPU = 2/day on long running P4 HTs all of a sudden
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Venus & Mars
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Jan 04
Posts: 56
Credit: 403,416
RAC: 0
United States
Message 134744 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 14:49:13 UTC

On mine and my wifes P4 HT machines, which mostly crunch Seti, I noticed this in the BOINC log this morning,

7/9/2005 6:31:06 AM|SETI@home|Message from server: No work sent
7/9/2005 6:31:06 AM|SETI@home|Message from server: (reached daily quota of 4 results)

Wifes computer has same message, then I went to the computer summary pages:
P4b 3.06
and
p4c 2.6 and saw the 2/day per CPU for these two hungry seti crunchers.

Any ideas on how to fix this?
<br>
Mars <br>
<img src='http://www.boincstats.com/stats/banner.php?cpid=7d22d5f982e9096d95fa085d6ee2c1bc'>
ID: 134744 · Report as offensive
Profile Jord
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 99
Posts: 15184
Credit: 4,362,181
RAC: 3
Netherlands
Message 134746 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 14:51:57 UTC

Welcome to the club. Are you only using Boinc CC4.45 or another one as well?

ID: 134746 · Report as offensive
Profile Venus & Mars
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Jan 04
Posts: 56
Credit: 403,416
RAC: 0
United States
Message 134748 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 14:55:30 UTC - in response to Message 134746.  

Welcome to the club. Are you only using Boinc CC4.45 or another one as well?


BOINC is ver 4.45 on both machines. Seti app is optimized, but the CC isn't, as I do run other projects on all my machines.

<br>
Mars <br>
<img src='http://www.boincstats.com/stats/banner.php?cpid=7d22d5f982e9096d95fa085d6ee2c1bc'>
ID: 134748 · Report as offensive
Profile Jord
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 99
Posts: 15184
Credit: 4,362,181
RAC: 3
Netherlands
Message 134752 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 15:05:56 UTC

Okay, well for now there is no real fix. I must say it's a weird thing, I went from 100 units/day to 1 unit/day overnight. I've already reported it to the developers list, but thought it was a side effect of CC4.70

If you're saying that you're using CC4.45, with no overly extra amount of errors in the past 2 weeks, then it's something to do with Seti (and Seti Beta).

For dev's, check V&M's results at this page, those No Reply units, is that it?
ID: 134752 · Report as offensive
Bill Barto

Send message
Joined: 28 Jun 99
Posts: 864
Credit: 58,712,313
RAC: 91
United States
Message 134760 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 15:50:38 UTC

I would say that the reason the daily quota has dropped is because of the workunits that have just expired on both Ageless's and Venus and Mars computers. It doesn't seem right that, eventhough all computers have been returning results reliably since those workunits were downloaded, that the daily quota should drop that much.
ID: 134760 · Report as offensive
Profile Paul D. Buck
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Jul 00
Posts: 3898
Credit: 1,158,042
RAC: 0
United States
Message 134762 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 15:53:50 UTC

Hmm, I have it at 1 a day per cpu for my PowerMac G5 ... interesting ... especially as I have 9 open Results in my buffer. AND, I have successes going way back to the turn of the month where we had that sour spot. So, does not make sense to me ...

I looked for the code that did this and was not able to find it ... maybe I will look again today ... really odd ...
ID: 134762 · Report as offensive
Profile KWSN - MajorKong
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 00
Posts: 2892
Credit: 1,499,890
RAC: 0
United States
Message 134763 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 15:55:51 UTC

I looked at one of their computers, and I would say that the cause is that string of 'no reply' units that are going overdue today...

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/results.php?hostid=220878&offset=260

I've had it happen to me... Once that bunch has all gone 'overdue', you should recover rather quickly as valid results are returned.

Moral of this story is that one should be VERY careful about dumping work into the bit bucket.
https://youtu.be/iY57ErBkFFE

#Texit

Don't blame me, I voted for Johnson(L) in 2016.

Truth is dangerous... especially when it challenges those in power.
ID: 134763 · Report as offensive
Profile Venus & Mars
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Jan 04
Posts: 56
Credit: 403,416
RAC: 0
United States
Message 134764 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 15:58:46 UTC - in response to Message 134760.  
Last modified: 9 Jul 2005, 16:20:04 UTC

You know, I noticed those workunits that are now starting to time out on the two computers. I can't find any record that they actually made it onto my machines for crunching. Could these possibly be "ghost wu's" I saw a post about a while ago?

EDIT: argh, I just noticed that all those non-completed wu's came from the day I switched the seti app to the optimized one. Doh, I should have drained the cache first it seems. It must have threw them away when I restarted BOINC. Lesson learned.

EDIT: and even further strangeness after the message earlier this morning that prompted my post,

7/9/2005 6:31:06 AM|SETI@home|Message from server: No work sent
7/9/2005 6:31:06 AM|SETI@home|Message from server: (reached daily quota of 4 results)

my machine just finished two WU's, sent them back and got four new wus downloaded,

7/9/2005 9:15:53 AM|SETI@home|Requesting 87498 seconds of work, returning 2 results
7/9/2005 9:15:55 AM|SETI@home|Scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded
7/9/2005 9:15:56 AM|SETI@home|Started download of 01no03aa.12221.16369.1028410.188
7/9/2005 9:15:56 AM|SETI@home|Started download of 01no03aa.12221.16369.1028410.138
7/9/2005 9:16:14 AM|SETI@home|Finished download of 01no03aa.12221.16369.1028410.188
7/9/2005 9:16:14 AM|SETI@home|Throughput 21595 bytes/sec
7/9/2005 9:16:14 AM|SETI@home|Finished download of 01no03aa.12221.16369.1028410.138
7/9/2005 9:16:14 AM|SETI@home|Throughput 21268 bytes/sec
7/9/2005 9:16:14 AM|SETI@home|Started download of 01no03aa.12221.16369.1028410.177
7/9/2005 9:16:14 AM|SETI@home|Started download of 01no03aa.12221.16369.1028410.205
ID: 134764 · Report as offensive
Profile Paul D. Buck
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Jul 00
Posts: 3898
Credit: 1,158,042
RAC: 0
United States
Message 134766 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 16:21:40 UTC

The code that decrements is in the Transitioner. SO, I had a LONG string of no returns for several days at the turn of the month. So, the count is decremented for each one of those that is transitioned as expired.

In theory, the fact that you had a long string of success should mitigate that down check, but, in fact, you are capped at 100 (or what ever the project uses) per CPU (max 4) per day ... so, the PowerMac has a "real" lower limit of 2 peer day ... as the remainder of the string of bad results are processed out and I continue to return good results, well that number should recover (though I have not found the place where it increases.

So, since we are all running multiple projects it is not that big of a deal, now is it? :)
ID: 134766 · Report as offensive
Profile Dorsai
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Sep 04
Posts: 474
Credit: 4,504,838
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 134770 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 16:31:16 UTC

Venus & Mars.

If i remember correctly the "max WU/day" will double every time you return a result on time, up to the Max of 100/day.
You are now on 8 a day for the 3Ghz machine, and 2 for the 2.6Ghz.

8 results returned successfully will put you back to 100/day, once they are all in.

2 returned will get you to 8 tomorrow, and then back to 100 the next day.

(But I guess you allready know this.)

Not too long to wait, but iritating, none the less...


Foamy is "Lord and Master".
(Oh, + some Classic WUs too.)
ID: 134770 · Report as offensive
Profile MikeSW17
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 1603
Credit: 2,700,523
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 134797 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 17:29:03 UTC - in response to Message 134744.  

On mine and my wifes P4 HT machines, which mostly crunch Seti, I noticed this in the BOINC log this morning,

7/9/2005 6:31:06 AM|SETI@home|Message from server: No work sent
7/9/2005 6:31:06 AM|SETI@home|Message from server: (reached daily quota of 4 results)

Wifes computer has same message, then I went to the computer summary pages:
P4b 3.06
and
p4c 2.6 and saw the 2/day per CPU for these two hungry seti crunchers.

Any ideas on how to fix this?


If you look back to work issued to you on June 25th, there are several results that you never returned. When they timed-out, your quota go chopped.
You don't need do anything to fix this, except return some good results.
Every time you return a good resukt, your quota will double again 1,2,4,8,16 etc. Very quickly you'll be back to a quota of 100.
Took about 10hrs to sort for me (8 results).

ID: 134797 · Report as offensive
Profile Paul D. Buck
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Jul 00
Posts: 3898
Credit: 1,158,042
RAC: 0
United States
Message 134844 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 20:09:23 UTC

Yeah, I am back to 4, but I have a lot of bad WU that will have to time out, so, I will be bouncing up and down for at least the next week ...
ID: 134844 · Report as offensive
Profile Jord
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 99
Posts: 15184
Credit: 4,362,181
RAC: 3
Netherlands
Message 134851 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 20:46:21 UTC - in response to Message 134844.  

Yeah, I am back to 4, but I have a lot of bad WU that will have to time out, so, I will be bouncing up and down for at least the next week ...

If you had lots of errors, I can see the bouncy thing. But having had only around 4 errors, two weeks ago and immediately penalizing so I have 1 unit a day? It's a tad harsh.

Do you know how long it'll take me to recover? At least 8 days, if I run Seti only. Too bad I've got 7 other projects attached. ;)

ID: 134851 · Report as offensive
SURVEYOR
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Oct 02
Posts: 375
Credit: 608,422
RAC: 0
United States
Message 134864 - Posted: 9 Jul 2005, 21:16:50 UTC

check this out
Here is am example of the validater error?
Wu sent out on the 4 July the file was uploaded on completion but the 'ready to report' was not return [because of the system was down due to mantenance] untill the 9 July and report Validate state Result was reported too late to validate, but the "Report deadline 18 Jul 2005 18:38:22 UTC".
Is this just an Alpha project problem or all projects.
Maybe the report should be sent with the uploading of the results.

http://isaac.ssl.berkeley.edu/alpha/result.php?resultid=23779


Result ID 23779
Name wu_1119511766_769_2
Workunit 3630
Created 4 Jul 2005 7:23:02 UTC
Sent 4 Jul 2005 18:38:22 UTC
Received 9 Jul 2005 8:59:46 UTC
Server state Over
Outcome Success
Client state Done
Exit status 0 (0x0)
Computer ID 441
Report deadline 18 Jul 2005 18:38:22 UTC
CPU time 10577.53125
stderr out
4.70
Validate state Result was reported too late to validate
Claimed credit 27.5310917142842
Granted credit 0
application version 4.18

Fred
BOINC Alpha, BOINC Beta, LHC Alpha, Einstein Alpha
ID: 134864 · Report as offensive
Metod, S56RKO
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 27 Sep 02
Posts: 309
Credit: 113,221,277
RAC: 9
Slovenia
Message 135638 - Posted: 11 Jul 2005, 17:46:56 UTC

The daily quota decreases really fast. Here's an example:

http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=332174

A home computer that isn't on very much with ISDN dial-up net access. I missed deadline of two work units recently. The daily quota was 100/day previously and it's 4 now.

Well, to get this number, one would have to take square root of previous daily quota for each invalid result: 10=sqrt(100), 4 is more or less equal to 3.16=sqrt(10) ...


Metod ...
ID: 135638 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : Maximum daily WU quota per CPU = 2/day on long running P4 HTs all of a sudden


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.