Message boards :
Number crunching :
Pentium 4 HT processor performance ramblings
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
xx Send message Joined: 23 May 99 Posts: 166 Credit: 3,450,910 RAC: 0 |
I'm running a Pentium 4 3.2 GHz hyperthreading processor (supports SSE2). I run two applications all the time: SETI and Prime95 (searches for Mersenne prime numbers). When I first added SETI to the system, I noticed the system idle process clocking quite a bit of time (checked via the Windows task manager). I discovered that by setting processor affinities, the system idle process stopped getting any time at all (GOOD thing). After a reboot, I now set the processor affinity of Prime95 to 0, and SETI to 1. By setting the affinity of BOINC and BOINCMGR to 1 also, I find that this affinity is maintained from one WU to the next. Wish this could be an option in preferences. It's interesting to note that when I switched to the enhanced SETI application, my processing times fell from about 15,000 to 6,000 seconds. Great improvement. Chuck |
Losi Send message Joined: 29 Jan 04 Posts: 51 Credit: 86,125 RAC: 0 |
I'm running a Pentium 4 3.2 GHz hyperthreading processor (supports SSE2). I run two applications all the time: SETI and Prime95 (searches for Mersenne prime numbers). I just upgraded my system to a P4 3.4Ghz 64bit with 2 meg cache and HT. The price of the cpu was cheap but I never expected it to crunch 2 work units at a time in Seti-Boinc. One thing I had to do was to run another 3 fans and update my case so that I could cool the cpu and mobo. Also the Thermaltake Typhoon cpu cooler does wonders compared to the standard fan and heatsink. Cheers Bill |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.