Ability to report dead WU's??

Message boards : Number crunching : Ability to report dead WU's??
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Archon

Send message
Joined: 31 Aug 01
Posts: 90
Credit: 400,599
RAC: 0
New Zealand
Message 117748 - Posted: 2 Jun 2005, 21:16:38 UTC

During a recent experiment with my setup I accidentaly killed 3 WU's ie. they are no longer on my machine but under the "Results for computer" page on the web site it still lists them as "In progres". I know that they will change to "No reply" after the deadline and get re-issued to someone else but I thought that it might be nice if we were able to, under "results for computer", have a WU cancel option. That way the WU will get issued to someone else in order to complete the courm, and people wont have to wait as long for credit to be granted?

Cheers

Gav



Nothing is 'fool-proof', someone will always invent a better fool!
ID: 117748 · Report as offensive
N/A
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 01
Posts: 3718
Credit: 93,649
RAC: 0
Message 117769 - Posted: 2 Jun 2005, 22:02:37 UTC - in response to Message 117748.  

[font='fixedsys,courier']I've had the same issue a number of times. The only option (I've been told) is to wait it out.[/font]
ID: 117769 · Report as offensive
gomeyer
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 21 May 99
Posts: 488
Credit: 50,370,425
RAC: 0
United States
Message 117774 - Posted: 2 Jun 2005, 22:24:54 UTC
Last modified: 2 Jun 2005, 22:26:00 UTC

What I would REALLY like is the ability to kill a workunit from 13 Jul 2004 repeat 2004. I have a machine that should have been deleted long ago that I cannot delete because of this orphan.

I have others under "live" machines that don't bother me as much, but I'm sick of looking at that machine.
ID: 117774 · Report as offensive
Profile Archon

Send message
Joined: 31 Aug 01
Posts: 90
Credit: 400,599
RAC: 0
New Zealand
Message 117904 - Posted: 3 Jun 2005, 2:52:17 UTC

I suppose the problem with deleteing machines is that the credit they have acumulated has to go somewhere, wouldnt want it to disapear.
Cheers

Gav



Nothing is 'fool-proof', someone will always invent a better fool!
ID: 117904 · Report as offensive
Profile Paul D. Buck
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Jul 00
Posts: 3898
Credit: 1,158,042
RAC: 0
United States
Message 117941 - Posted: 3 Jun 2005, 3:57:07 UTC - in response to Message 117904.  

I suppose the problem with deleteing machines is that the credit they have acumulated has to go somewhere, wouldnt want it to disapear.


Deleting a Host from the account will not change the credit scores.

You cannot delete a host until all the WU/Results associated have been purged. When the count hits 0 you can delete it.

You may be able to merge it with the "real" machine ...

If not, you have to wait. I have one machine that has a result pending from July of last year... still has not been purged the lst time I checked.
ID: 117941 · Report as offensive
Profile mikey
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Dec 99
Posts: 4215
Credit: 3,474,603
RAC: 0
United States
Message 118219 - Posted: 3 Jun 2005, 20:36:26 UTC - in response to Message 117941.  

If not, you have to wait. I have one machine that has a result pending from July of last year... still has not been purged the lst time I checked.

What I would like to see if a way to report those LONG overdue units. OBVIOUSLY Berkeleys software is not picking them up, so if there were a way to send the data to berkeley then they could work on them. At present I do not know of a way to do that. It MIGHT even help with the database, the units are obviously taking up space and could be causing unseen problems. My oldest is also from July but I have 2 machines with different units, BOTH from July!

ID: 118219 · Report as offensive
TPR_Mojo
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 Apr 00
Posts: 323
Credit: 7,001,052
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 118221 - Posted: 3 Jun 2005, 20:44:39 UTC

Why don't we all just list out any units older than, say, 9 months in a dedicated thread and the team can then chase them down as other priorities allow?
ID: 118221 · Report as offensive
Profile Pooh Bear 27
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Jul 03
Posts: 3224
Credit: 4,603,826
RAC: 0
United States
Message 118222 - Posted: 3 Jun 2005, 20:55:42 UTC

I would say about 6 months, since there are MANY that I know from November/December that are froze up. Since they only keep 2-4 weeks on, 6 months is not a bad spot. So, someone go start it, and I will add mine into it.



My movie https://vimeo.com/manage/videos/502242
ID: 118222 · Report as offensive
Profile mikey
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Dec 99
Posts: 4215
Credit: 3,474,603
RAC: 0
United States
Message 118726 - Posted: 4 Jun 2005, 16:12:12 UTC - in response to Message 118222.  

I would say about 6 months, since there are MANY that I know from November/December that are froze up. Since they only keep 2-4 weeks on, 6 months is not a bad spot. So, someone go start it, and I will add mine into it.

I guess "someone" did!
Now I just hope Berkeley does something with the list.
Thakyou
ID: 118726 · Report as offensive
Profile Pooh Bear 27
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Jul 03
Posts: 3224
Credit: 4,603,826
RAC: 0
United States
Message 119144 - Posted: 5 Jun 2005, 6:05:40 UTC

At the time I asked someone else to start, I was too busy at work. When I saw a little while later no one started it, I decided to get it started.

Yes, I hope that the powers at be will see this thread with over 30 users putting their old dead WU in, notices, and decides to clean up the old junk out of the database.

I would love to clean up my dead machine, as I know others would, also. This makes more database cleaning if these old unused machines are removed also. Less to have to keep track of.



My movie https://vimeo.com/manage/videos/502242
ID: 119144 · Report as offensive
Profile Paul D. Buck
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Jul 00
Posts: 3898
Credit: 1,158,042
RAC: 0
United States
Message 119255 - Posted: 5 Jun 2005, 14:13:14 UTC - in response to Message 119144.  

At the time I asked someone else to start, I was too busy at work. When I saw a little while later no one started it, I decided to get it started.

Yes, I hope that the powers at be will see this thread with over 30 users putting their old dead WU in, notices, and decides to clean up the old junk out of the database.

I would love to clean up my dead machine, as I know others would, also. This makes more database cleaning if these old unused machines are removed also. Less to have to keep track of.


The overhead is insignificant ... removing the records will make no difference to anything but our blood pressure ...
ID: 119255 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : Ability to report dead WU's??


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.