Security Alert

Message boards : Number crunching : Security Alert
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Ace Casino
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Feb 03
Posts: 285
Credit: 29,750,804
RAC: 15
United States
Message 108987 - Posted: 8 May 2005, 17:26:23 UTC

I just got on my computer to see if Seti was back on-line. I went to the Seti home page, saw that it was, so decided to upload WU's and download some work. I than got a security alert from my Norton Anti Virus. This is what came up and what it said:
Norton Internet Worm Protection has detected and blocked an intrusion attempt.
Security rule: Default Block Orifice 2000 Trojan horse.
Local address: 4.248.255.220
Remote address: 219.249.138.14

I was not on any other site but Seti. No e-mails. Just the homepage of seti and my account and tried to download and upload WU's.
Could Seti be sending out a virus and not knowing it??? What is going on or what could have happened. I have never got this alert before! -Worried Seti guy-

ID: 108987 · Report as offensive
1mp0£173
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 8423
Credit: 356,897
RAC: 0
United States
Message 108993 - Posted: 8 May 2005, 17:37:07 UTC - in response to Message 108987.  

<blockquote>I just got on my computer to see if Seti was back on-line. I went to the Seti home page, saw that it was, so decided to upload WU's and download some work. I than got a security alert from my Norton Anti Virus. This is what came up and what it said:
Norton Internet Worm Protection has detected and blocked an intrusion attempt.
Security rule: Default Block Orifice 2000 Trojan horse.
Local address: 4.248.255.220
Remote address: 219.249.138.14

I was not on any other site but Seti. No e-mails. Just the homepage of seti and my account and tried to download and upload WU's.
Could Seti be sending out a virus and not knowing it??? What is going on or what could have happened. I have never got this alert before! -Worried Seti guy-
</blockquote>
Both IP addresses appear to be DSL lines, and not part of either IP block at SETI.

Most likely, it's something else -- if you use Internet Explorer, it could be a browser helper object that downloads worms (why I use FireFox).

Or, it could be a random infected computer "out there" trying to connect to you at random.
ID: 108993 · Report as offensive
Profile Steve Cressman
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Jun 02
Posts: 583
Credit: 65,644
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 109075 - Posted: 8 May 2005, 20:20:22 UTC
Last modified: 8 May 2005, 20:20:38 UTC

>Or, it could be a random infected computer "out there" trying to connect to you at random.

I agree with you there. Port 445 and 139 are still being hammered on my firewall. Would ne nice if people would look after their systems better. But there are alot out there who can hardly find the on switch. So protect youself.

98SE XP2500+ @ 2.1 GHz Boinc v5.8.8

And God said"Let there be light."But then the program crashed because he was trying to access the 'light' property of a NULL universe pointer.
ID: 109075 · Report as offensive
Profile slavko.sk
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 Jun 00
Posts: 346
Credit: 417,028
RAC: 0
Slovakia
Message 109083 - Posted: 8 May 2005, 20:29:03 UTC

It is a internet "noise", I'm getting a log of them on mi FW. That's normal, people are hammering another computers and looking for victims.
ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD!
Potrebujete pomoc?
My Stats
ID: 109083 · Report as offensive
1mp0£173
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 8423
Credit: 356,897
RAC: 0
United States
Message 109150 - Posted: 8 May 2005, 23:18:00 UTC - in response to Message 109075.  

<blockquote>>Or, it could be a random infected computer "out there" trying to connect to you at random.

I agree with you there. Port 445 and 139 are still being hammered on my firewall. Would ne nice if people would look after their systems better. But there are alot out there who can hardly find the on switch. So protect youself.
</blockquote>
Actually it is a strong argument for egress filtering -- providers (especially large cable and DSL providers) should block outbound traffic on ports like 139, 445 and yes, even port 25.
ID: 109150 · Report as offensive
Profile Ace Casino
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Feb 03
Posts: 285
Credit: 29,750,804
RAC: 15
United States
Message 109293 - Posted: 9 May 2005, 15:27:40 UTC - in response to Message 109150.  

This just really took me by surprise. In over a decade on the net I've NEVER been attacked by a WORM. My Anti-virus has only detected maybe 4 e-mail viruses in over 10 years also. My internet company just in the past year or so has installed filters. When I first hooked up with my IP there where only a 100-200 people signed up. Now, even a decade later there are only a 3,000 - 4,000. I'm just letting you know how small my provider is (and my community) and that it's not an AOL. I use Netscape and have for about 10 years now. I don't know much about Firefox but really like Netscape. I may not even know how to use IE (just kid'n). I don't have DSL and couldn't get it if i wanted to. Well, thanks for your help! Was just a little worried that the only place I had been was the Seti site and downloading Seti Wu's.
"Randy"
~~~
ID: 109293 · Report as offensive
1mp0£173
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 8423
Credit: 356,897
RAC: 0
United States
Message 109304 - Posted: 9 May 2005, 15:58:12 UTC - in response to Message 109293.  

<blockquote>This just really took me by surprise. In over a decade on the net I've NEVER been attacked by a WORM. My Anti-virus has only detected maybe 4 e-mail viruses in over 10 years also. My internet company just in the past year or so has installed filters. When I first hooked up with my IP there where only a 100-200 people signed up. Now, even a decade later there are only a 3,000 - 4,000. I'm just letting you know how small my provider is (and my community) and that it's not an AOL.</blockquote>
From where I'm sitting, I can't tell the difference betwen dialup, DSL, or Cable reliably -- it's an IP, and it's a good guess that it's part of a consumer block.

My ISP is smaller, with the notable difference that I run my ISP. We aren't big in access, we do more hosting and development.

I strongly suggest that you've been attacked tens of thousands of times and that those attacks simply weren't effective. There are too many worms like SQL Slammer that were able to infect 90% of the vulnerable hosts in the first 8 1/2 minutes, too many worms like NIMDA that should have been completely dead years ago but are still out "in the wild."
ID: 109304 · Report as offensive
Profile Tigher
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 Mar 04
Posts: 1547
Credit: 760,577
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 109312 - Posted: 9 May 2005, 16:14:30 UTC - in response to Message 109150.  
Last modified: 9 May 2005, 16:26:18 UTC

<blockquote><blockquote>>Or, it could be a random infected computer "out there" trying to connect to you at random.

I agree with you there. Port 445 and 139 are still being hammered on my firewall. Would ne nice if people would look after their systems better. But there are alot out there who can hardly find the on switch. So protect youself.
</blockquote>
Actually it is a strong argument for egress filtering -- providers (especially large cable and DSL providers) should block outbound traffic on ports like 139, 445 and yes, even port 25.</blockquote>

Yes I agree. I block all netbios traffic in and out plus lots of other. hehe I actually found an attempt to use CUPS because I was advertising printer availability once LOL!. It pays to check out what is going out too. .....when one looks at the logs and think about what has been going on while sleeping one soon learns to tighten it all up. I do think the blocking should be user controlled though. I would not like to think ports on my server were not accessible because my ISP had blocked them.....if I read you right? Having a decent firewall helps a lot! What do folk here use?

ID: 109312 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : Security Alert


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.