Message boards :
Number crunching :
Credit claimed is dependent upon BOINC core version???
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
adrianxw Send message Joined: 14 Jul 99 Posts: 173 Credit: 1,698,756 RAC: 3 |
This is kind of weird. My results show a claimed credit of 37-38 for a typical 12,000 second wu until the 16th when it drops to 28-29. The same is true of my Einstein results where a 33,000 second job used to claim 95-100 now seems to claim 75. Also my Predictor results show a drop from 30 for a 10,000 second job to 23. It is difficult to see if CPDN has altered, and there is no LHC work at the moment. My machine has not changed in this period, and looking at the benchmarks I'm getting arouns 1280 Whetstones as usual. What I did do on the 16th was change my BOINC core client from 4.19 to 4.25. Can anyone explain this? Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream. |
Thierry Van Driessche Send message Joined: 20 Aug 02 Posts: 3083 Credit: 150,096 RAC: 0 |
This has been discussed a.o. here. It is indeed true that v4.25 gives other and lower results of benchmark compared to earlier versions. The benchmark results with v4.19 and lower were incorrect. |
adrianxw Send message Joined: 14 Jul 99 Posts: 173 Credit: 1,698,756 RAC: 3 |
Yes, I got the answer from Einstein... Prior to 4.2x the windows client was returning bad benchmark scores, resulting in too much credit being requested. This has been corrected in the lastest versions. ... not personally you understand, from a reputable member at Einstein!!! *** EDIT *** I beg his pardon, he was a Predictor, not an Einstein! Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.