same Wu, claim 0.00 and 17.02

Author	Message
NOVALOGIC DF3 CQB***GOA*** Send message Joined: 22 Feb 02 Posts: 12 Credit: 420,639 RAC: 0	Message 91236 - Posted: 26 Mar 2005, 16:48:24 UTC Last modified: 26 Mar 2005, 16:50:45 UTC Result ID click for details Computer Sent Time reported or deadline explain Server state explain Outcome explain Client state explain CPU time (sec) claimed credit granted credit 45646511 143636 23 Mar 2005 5:30:42 UTC 23 Mar 2005 22:50:54 UTC Over Success Done 0.00 0.00 pending 46642911 656921 25 Mar 2005 14:41:15 UTC 25 Mar 2005 23:28:05 UTC Over Success Done 6,376.20 17.02 pending ~~~~~~~~~~~~ why one used O.OOs and claim 0.00, but another used 6376s and claim 17.02? <img src='http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/993sah.png'><img src='http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/993eah.png'> ID: 91236 ·

Timothy Maness Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 159 Credit: 4,929 RAC: 0	Message 91268 - Posted: 26 Mar 2005, 18:35:51 UTC Last modified: 26 Mar 2005, 18:37:42 UTC CPU time 0 stderr out 4.13 WU download error: couldn't get input files: 13ja05ab.9363.13440.415884.120: MD5 computation error 0 0 Click on the "result ID" numbers to find out what went on with the unit during computation, if there is anything funny that you notice. On a side note, the 0.00 credit result will probably be dropped when the unit is validated (validator drops the top and bottom scores and awars the average of the middle score(s)). side note, it looks like the WU in question may be dropped, because of excessive errors. <img border="0" src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/stats.php?userID=567" /> <a href="http://boinc-doc.net/boinc-wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page">BOINC Wiki</a> <a href="http://www.tamaness.hostrocket.com/BOINC_team.html">Gideontech BOINC team!</a> ID: 91268 ·

Bill Barto Send message Joined: 28 Jun 99 Posts: 864 Credit: 58,712,313 RAC: 91	Message 91284 - Posted: 26 Mar 2005, 19:49:00 UTC Computer number 143636 is having some bad problems. Just about all recent results are either client errors or validate errors. It is still using ver 4.13 which could be part of the problem. Overclocking could be another problem. ID: 91284 ·

AccidentReport Send message Joined: 13 Jun 03 Posts: 6 Credit: 4,464 RAC: 0	Message 91287 - Posted: 26 Mar 2005, 20:04:55 UTC - in response to Message 91268. On a COMPLETE side note....how do you get those tables at the bottom of your posts? <br> <img src="http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/comb-1093.jpg"> <br>BOINC-ing since 23rd March 2005. ID: 91287 ·

Timothy Maness Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 159 Credit: 4,929 RAC: 0	Message 91365 - Posted: 26 Mar 2005, 23:27:42 UTC - in response to Message 91287. > On a COMPLETE side note....how do you get those tables at the bottom of your > posts? > boinc.mundayweb.com boincstats.com there are others, but what you do is you go to the site, find/make (depending on what you want it to do) the graphic to put in your sig, and most places will generate code for you to insert it. <img border="0" src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/stats.php?userID=567" /> <a href="http://boinc-doc.net/boinc-wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page">BOINC Wiki</a> <a href="http://www.tamaness.hostrocket.com/BOINC_team.html">Gideontech BOINC team!</a> ID: 91365 ·

©2024 University of California

SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.