Have Wu got bigger?

Message boards : Number crunching : Have Wu got bigger?

Author	Message
Jaaku Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 29 Oct 02 Posts: 494 Credit: 346,224 RAC: 0	Message 6438 - Posted: 11 Jul 2004, 9:57:55 UTC Last modified: 11 Jul 2004, 9:58:36 UTC
	I have 4 wu left, 2 i got on the morning of the 9th and they say they will be compleated in 4 hours this is wrong but not extreamly out. My other 2 are from the night of the 9th and morning of 10th they say they will be compleated in 28hours. Have wu got larger? Has SETI made a new bug? Or is my PC weird?
	ID: 6438 ·

N A Send message Joined: 26 Jul 99 Posts: 12 Credit: 50,411 RAC: 0	Message 6440 - Posted: 11 Jul 2004, 10:05:42 UTC - in response to Message 6438.
	> I have 4 wu left, 2 i got on the morning of the 9th and they say they will be > compleated in 4 hours this is wrong but not extreamly out. My other 2 are from > the night of the 9th and morning of 10th they say they will be compleated in > 28hours. > Have wu got larger? > Has SETI made a new bug? > Or is my PC weird? > [url=http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/team_display.php?teamid=55755] > Somebody hasn't bothered to read any other posts. If you had you would've seen that this has been posted before. Check the forums first before you post.
	ID: 6440 ·

bjacke Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 14 Apr 02 Posts: 346 Credit: 13,761 RAC: 0	Message 6446 - Posted: 11 Jul 2004, 10:24:03 UTC
	With S@h there is a debugging file running. So it will take ist bit more I think. The whole is more then the sum of its particles. Aristoteles Best wishes from Berlin(Germany), where you can't see the Milky Way ;-)! [/url] Basti
	ID: 6446 ·

Bill Barto Send message Joined: 28 Jun 99 Posts: 859 Credit: 12,064,311 RAC: 16,696	Message 6484 - Posted: 11 Jul 2004, 12:41:36 UTC - in response to Message 6446. Last modified: 11 Jul 2004, 12:43:39 UTC
	The increased "to completion" time has nothing to do with debugging files. The work units take no longer to complete than before. This has been discussed in other posts. > With S@h there is a debugging file running. So it will take ist bit more I > think. > > > The whole is more then the sum of its particles. Aristoteles > Best wishes from Berlin(Germany), where you can't see the Milky Way ;-)! > > Basti >
	ID: 6484 ·

SURVEYOR Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Oct 02 Posts: 375 Credit: 480,947 RAC: 171	Message 6557 - Posted: 11 Jul 2004, 16:36:05 UTC
	There was a problem with the estimated time to complete, the problem is now fixed. The wu's are the same size as before. BOINC Alpha Tester BOINC Beta Tester
	ID: 6557 ·

Thierry Van Driessche Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 20 Aug 02 Posts: 3083 Credit: 140,740 RAC: 0	Message 6600 - Posted: 11 Jul 2004, 18:57:19 UTC - in response to Message 6557. Last modified: 20 Jul 2004, 12:35:59 UTC
	> There was a problem with the estimated time to complete, the problem is now > fixed. The wu's are the same size as before. I got 2 hours ago 2 new WU's. The "long" completion time is still the same. Greetings from Belgium.
	ID: 6600 ·

SURVEYOR Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Oct 02 Posts: 375 Credit: 480,947 RAC: 171	Message 6608 - Posted: 11 Jul 2004, 19:07:56 UTC
	I recieved two wu 28 hr completion time, the next one that I received is back to 4HRS 45 mins. So I ass/u/me[d] the problem was fixed, maybe there are some wu resent with the inflated estimated time. The time index is attached with the wu when it is split [or made]. If that wu was resent the estimated time is still inflated. This is just my guess. FRED BOINC Alpha Tester BOINC Beta Tester
	ID: 6608 ·

Message boards : Number crunching : Have Wu got bigger?