Message boards :
Number crunching :
OK, this seems odd
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Nuadormrac Send message Joined: 7 Apr 00 Posts: 136 Credit: 1,703,351 RAC: 0 |
Noticed this while checking forums. Last post -10 seconds ago... A time warp or negative time would be an interesting proposition :D Topic Threads Posts Last post SETI@home Science Life in the universe, radio SETI, and SETI@home's search for ET 534 3453 13 minutes ago Number crunching Credit, leaderboards, CPU performance 2927 34317 -10 seconds ago Cafe SETI Trade stories with other SETI@home users 870 27103 33 minutes ago |
Jan Inge Send message Joined: 24 Sep 02 Posts: 21 Credit: 1,655,076 RAC: 0 |
> Noticed this while checking forums. Last post -10 seconds ago... A time warp > or negative time would be an interesting proposition :D > > Topic Threads Posts Last post > > SETI@home Science > Life in the universe, radio SETI, and SETI@home's search for ET 534 3453 13 > minutes ago > Number crunching > Credit, leaderboards, CPU performance 2927 34317 -10 seconds ago > Cafe SETI > Trade stories with other SETI@home users 870 27103 33 minutes ago > > I have seen this also. Its been like that for atleast a month. |
Toby Send message Joined: 26 Oct 00 Posts: 1005 Credit: 6,366,949 RAC: 0 |
It has been brought up before. It is just a slight time difference between the database server and the webserver. When a new post is created, the timestamp is based on the database server's clock. When the page is displayed to you by the webserver, it takes the difference between the timestamp and the web server's clock. The database server is obviously running about 10 seconds fast. A member of The Knights Who Say NI! For rankings, history graphs and more, check out: My BOINC stats site |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.