BOINC on a USB key

Message boards : Number crunching : BOINC on a USB key
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
RB

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 00
Posts: 103
Credit: 1,084,436
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 83102 - Posted: 27 Feb 2005, 20:41:58 UTC

Interesting idea raised by "..." .

Has anyone ever done this? Would the number crunching be faster than having BOINC installed on your harddrive?

If there is a current thread on this, sorry for duplicate thread, could you post a link?

That is something I'd like to test !!




ID: 83102 · Report as offensive
Janus
Volunteer developer

Send message
Joined: 4 Dec 01
Posts: 376
Credit: 967,976
RAC: 0
Denmark
Message 83107 - Posted: 27 Feb 2005, 20:51:00 UTC - in response to Message 83102.  

Please note that USB sticks have a limited number of write cycles. Running any BOINC project directly from a stick isn't a good idea. Instead you should have a look at ramdrives. Combining these two techniques could be interesting...

None of these will make your crunching faster - all they will allow you to do is to make your harddrives spin down and produce less noise (and consume less power; produce less heat).
ID: 83107 · Report as offensive
Prototype
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 67
Credit: 497,118
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 83109 - Posted: 27 Feb 2005, 21:03:37 UTC

Tried it briefly a few months ago on a friends machine with a 128Mb USB stick, worked without problems.

Although I would agree with what Janus said about the limited amount of write cycles on the flash memory used in USB sticks, the one I tried worked for about a week with no obvious problem to either data crunched or the stick itself which still works fine (in a much more boring role as part of a "sneaker-net").


ID: 83109 · Report as offensive
Profile Siran d'Vel'nahr
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 May 99
Posts: 7379
Credit: 44,181,323
RAC: 238
United States
Message 83213 - Posted: 28 Feb 2005, 3:57:24 UTC - in response to Message 83107.  

> Please note that USB sticks have a limited number of write cycles. Running any
> BOINC project directly from a stick isn't a good idea. Instead you should have
> a look at ramdrives. Combining these two techniques could be interesting...
>
> None of these will make your crunching faster - all they will allow you to do
> is to make your harddrives spin down and produce less noise (and consume less
> power; produce less heat).
>

OFF-TOPIC:
Hey Janus, can you fix the message boards so they will jump to the edit box when replying to a post? It's a bit, uuh, annoying having to scroll down by hand. Just a thought.... >:-)
ON-TOPIC;

No comments on the topic, sorry.... >:-(

L8R....

T'Khasi Time: Sunday, 27 February 2005 - 07:56 PM --800 (Pacific Standard Time)

CAPT Siran d'Vel'nahr - L L & P _\\//
Winders 11 OS? "What a piece of junk!" - L. Skywalker
"Logic is the cement of our civilization with which we ascend from chaos using reason as our guide." - T'Plana-hath
ID: 83213 · Report as offensive
ric
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 03
Posts: 482
Credit: 666,047
RAC: 0
Switzerland
Message 83267 - Posted: 28 Feb 2005, 11:22:41 UTC - in response to Message 83213.  
Last modified: 28 Feb 2005, 11:23:02 UTC

>BOINC on a USB key
what exactly do you mean?

having the boinc folder only on the USB drive OR
having the full OS including the boinc folder?

Last year I tested a win98se including the boinc folder
starting not from an USB but from a compact flash drive.

It worked fine from a 128 MB CF and also from an old 340 MB micro drive.

Since last Friday running 2 clients with ramdisks, this ramdisk (about 80 mb)
carries the full boinc folder (Einstein and LHC attached).

This ramdisk offers a periodic save to harddisk of the ramdisk-image.
every 15 Minutes the save is done.

So far, it look great.
I did it to reduce the overall hd access, so the harddisk sleeps.

At seti@classic, was using only ramdisks, from m$ and from the *nix(lpr) based clients.


You can get the ramdisk from here :
ID: 83267 · Report as offensive
Profile keeleysam
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Dec 03
Posts: 133
Credit: 60,478,373
RAC: 0
United States
Message 83269 - Posted: 28 Feb 2005, 12:25:32 UTC - in response to Message 83267.  

> This ramdisk offers a periodic save to harddisk of the ramdisk-image.
> every 15 Minutes the save is done.
>
> So far, it look great.
> I did it to reduce the overall hd access, so the harddisk sleeps.
>
I think spinning the harddrive up and down every 15 minutes isn't going to make much of a difference in power usage, and it will also make the life of the drive MUCH shorter.
ID: 83269 · Report as offensive
ric
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 03
Posts: 482
Credit: 666,047
RAC: 0
Switzerland
Message 83314 - Posted: 28 Feb 2005, 16:03:24 UTC - in response to Message 83269.  

>I think spinning the harddrive up and down every 15 minutes isn't going to >make much of a difference in power usage, and it will also make the life of >the drive MUCH shorter.

Don't think, just look at the harddisk technical sheet.;-)

Modern HD are build for that.

then you know what the fact is....

The maingain is the quiteness

Seeing your stats, I'm doing your total from all project in less that one day,
*G* so I guess I watch more my experience than what other are thinking...

ID: 83314 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : BOINC on a USB key


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.